Transcripción

Transcripción

The Startup Accelerator Business Model And The Emergence Of Venture Builders — vídeo y transcripción

You can also read the blog post here: http://buff.ly/2gHfTv2 In our November podcast we talked about how the increasing number of accelerators are making it harder and harder to produce winner programs. An emergence of venture builders or

www.youtube.com 2026-04-19 Ver fuente

Título

The Startup Accelerator Business Model And The Emergence Of Venture Builders — vídeo y transcripción

Resumen

You can also read the blog post here: http://buff.ly/2gHfTv2

In our November podcast we talked about how the increasing number of accelerators are making it harder and harder to produce winner programs. An emergence of venture builders or company builders, focusing on fewer projects with a deeper focus on each project, is maybe what more and more accelerators will turn into.

Puntos clave

  • [Music] welcome to the ethnic podcast and my name is Sandra Holland today we will discuss the differences between startup accelerators incubators and venture builders if they work for startups and if so what's the success factors and we're super lucky to have with us some great people we had angle Garcia director of startup bootcamp IOT data and cybersecurity was a Patricio Hunt managing partner of intellectual and also the ethnic president Pernod Ferraro welcome to you all thank you be here so to start off with young he'll you've been involved with startup bootcamp for a while now couple years you also invested in a couple of the projects yourself what is it that you find so interesting with with this type of program compared to just regular seed funding well I finished our different things I mean city funded our cellar a toes and incubators there are a lot of animals probably we're going to discuss it in the during the podcasts are completely different things Anthony's a serratus are to some extent trying to prepare these teams sometimes even don't even companies these teams to be some kind of investable company or an investable startup right so we are early I think in the in the process of the funding so I don't think that we have to compare such investment with celery toes or a complete different animals the things that we are looking for our different I'm probably something that we're going to discuss today right right what are you finding appealing with with these kind of programs what what are the big pros for you well as a personal level accelerator is something that you are really much more deep into the people I mean it's a lot about the personal relationship I mean really helping in a day to day basis to these guys son invested I mean you take some distance right them is much more a financial investment it's also a financial investment foreign selector but these are other much more personal factors I mean you mean you're gonna really try to help these guys to make the dream a reality right this is you are going to the personal level so it's something much more much more personal that when you are I get an investor then you start to have your legal implications and your financial rules and this kind of thing so you're moving to a different level I think that both elements are necessary in an ecosystem but are doing different things and act in a different stage and petitio you have a different approach more than like a traditional accelerator with a six month program right tell us a little bit about your approach to startups and how startups approach you well we have different models actually because we running the tech stars startup next program which is a traditional program or you have a selection process in the beginning applicants that are interested in in getting in etc and that's a batch process and we do it twice a year and then we have our let's say our own boutique accelerator which is Internet tube and there we do whatever we think is best for our company and depends a lot in the context of the company the team the stage of the company our interest in the company as well so we do a very different thing there we usually do one or two companies every year only that we really do a let's say we do a custom fit program and we just concentrate on what the team really needs and it's a very different approach so why did you choose this approach instead of as you are affiliated with the tech stars the more traditional program what did you choose to do this kind of thing basically we are doing things us as we see there require in the rhythm is not something that we have a device in a very specific way we are always sort of innovating on the periphery of the of things and we are looking finding exactly what are the best opportunities that we have there and we go behind those opportunities at the same time for example last year we founded a mobile venture builder because we thought there was a perhaps a more interesting model for us and it was probably a model that was better for our skills so now we are very focused on that program as well and we are doing things as they are coming to us and taking opportunities mostly rather than how very let's say focus strategy based on exactly things that we think are that we have to do I mean we're more open to innovation rather than designing what we want to exactly and talking about venture builders but not you used to be ethnic used to be a very traditional accelerator used to call it the hacker accelerator once but but it changed a bit the last time can you tell us about what has to change and when you speak to people now what do you call it Nick hmm so we never meant to be a traditional accelerator so that's why we call it the hacker accelerator but basically what we did what we did in our short span of life is experimenting so we tried different models and we experimented and we reached to the conclusion that a fixed program with a set of mentors with a certain amount of resources devoted to each project and with the need of having to do n number of projects every n number of time was not possible for us we studied the mother we analyzed it and we realized that it was not possible at least for us and so we decided to move away from this model and and start companies and commit about committing the companies that we were growing so increasing our participation and our effort in smaller companies instead of doing a model based on quantity time statistics so we we tried to focus on smaller projects on a small number of projects and then commit on these projects forever not just for a period of time but making sure that if we are something and we take something out of this project it will be along with the other enterpreneurs that are that are doing it so we we take big bigger stakes in the companies that we work and we take full responsibility we don't look for winners we make them and we make winner teams and winner projects we are continuously striving to find the greatest talent and we take responsibility of funding the projects of of the success of the project in the long term hmm so that's a difference in the mother we then we don't participate in a bad way in a very early stage in a short amount or close amount of time and we take responsibility almost forever in the projects right then okay you have been sorry to campus is one of the more successful accelerators in Europe one would say and but but the business model business model itself as Bernard says they went away from it that was their own choice but but how are you looking at the business model do you find it successful itself or is it too early to say what do you think it's a very good question because the thing that the other day I was speaking well I don't remember what it was but he was talking about the salah laid off right and i did some kind of research about and i find out that what it was at angel is that there are two thousand accelerators in the world which is not true it's not true which is true is the there are 2,000 companies or entities that are claiming to be an accelerator because at the end of the day I mean you take a look to all these two thousand websites and all of the necessary half workshops I have mentors and I'm gonna move you to the next level and blah blah blah blah blah but at the end the reality is that most of them they are starting today and in two years from now and and windier for now they have to rethink about the model because the model is not sustainable yes by definition means you are trying to have some tables and chairs and if you are not don't have enough money in order to deliver enough value so you're trying to make money with the equity that you are taking in these companies but at the same time you have enough resources in order to deliver enough value to these companies well it's trying to do a circle with that square it's gonna be a challenge I think that there are some players out there I'm not saying that we are better or not but we have a different model I mean we have these corporations support in our province and I'm talking not only about to start a boot camp but also techstars of black and play or the guys from Y Combinator of all 500 starters in the US that we have these corporations investing or supporting our programs in order to have access to innovation and that's what makes our business model sustainable I mean there are few solar leaders in the world that they have been in the market for more than six seven years around the ones that are describing and of course that we are changing things internally but we have find out is way a sustainable business model that if you look around is it's not in others always have to rethink about different ways to do it different ways to find sources of finding in order to be able to get money back from this equity stake that's the set before I mean we don't have enough resources to invest in these companies the likelihood to get a lot of money from this equity stake is right so very poor right so we have been doing other things sorcery changing things focusing more and more in the vertical thing right that probably we are going to speak later I mean is one of the futures of accelerators trying to be much more specific in something but again everything that we have this specific business model that allows our to provide or deliver at least more resources and we believe that more value that little players in the market positio you have also been involved with this traditional type of programs but as we talked about like the accelerate accelerate that's all only been around for a couple of years it's a fairly new new thing so when when can we say that accelerator is the success at what time is it too early or is it in the future what do you think I think that like who was saying there are many type of accelerators and you can call accelerators really just a few of them so basically I think those that are focused on verticals will probably be more successful in the long term also the first accelerators the world ones that are more consolidated like Y Combinator tech stars start at bootcamp and a few others probably because they were the first to market and because they have this effect of being able to select the best companies all over the world those are probably going to stand out and going to continue in a success for the rest what you have to do to see if you can find a specific model that may deliver some special value to the companies that you are looking for specifically but should be like a very very let's say focused group of companies and I guess those ones are the ones that are going to prevail right right for us the model let's say in our case we've been going from the hybrid custom-fit sort of program that we deliver we only do that as I said before just for a couple of companies perhaps each year and then we also Bernard was saying we found out these along many years and looking for well whatever the best thing for us to do and finally we came to the conclusion that a company will there was in our case the best thing to to concentrate our deliberate efforts on the other hand as I was saying also you have to remain sort of open to innovate on the periphery so if they come to us a couple of teams every year that we see that they're really good and we can help them we do that I mean we help them in the way that they need and in the way that is better for them to eat we have but our deliberate efforts now are just focus on the company wielder which we see that is the best model for us in order to build companies it's a kind of model perhaps it's more closer to whatever nut is doing we we select further we'll go all the other way I mean we select the space in which we want to innovate we look for a company that would validate our concept then we select the technology we build the technology we get traction in the market and if we get real traction then we'll go and try to find that team that would be able to take this to a success or to a spin-off that could be successful in the long term so this is a completely different model we believe in in our case in particular that this is the best for us to we believe that's the model where we can be more successful and this is why we do that yeah I have a question related to that yes no please please go ahead and I think it's interesting to analyze what we define as sustainable and how sustainable is a goal by itself so is it is it not profitable the goal of any business so shouldn't we create profitable business but still and I would like to understand how an accelerator can be sustainable and and how an accelerator can be profitable on what's a ball and what's the time span needed for that so I think that those are the biggest questions I'd realizes in the world even the first accelerators in 2005 Paula Hammond started Dominator think tech stuff was one year later no something like that 2006 and these are the old examples the oldest from them many accelerators appeared as you said and but I think none of them are still or have enough track record today to say that they are profitable business models even Y Combinator so to say they are profitable you have to set and expect an expectation at some point and you have to fit this expectation but Y Combinator grow so big that they get increasing their expectation so now they even expect to be way more weak and they are getting the best deal flow in the world so when it's an accelerator well when can we call an accelerator a sustainable business model or a profitable business model is it mean does it mean that you have a source for investment that keeps coming or or whatever you mean to your uncle for example or a sustainable model is something that you can keep in the time right something that you can keep doing for a lot of time sure and I think all these models are clearly sustainable because they have been in the market for a lot of period of time don't thing about that the model is only to make money with the equity in the companies they are also making money with the corporations and but I think the the the best way to look at that I mean these guys have been in the market for a long time all the guys are not longer in the market so there are guys that are sustainable the guys are not sustainable and we're talking about all these guys in the market it's a big group nearly 2,000 accelerators yeah you're trying to get the best talent to startup bootcamp every year or every a for every program doesn't it make it harder for you guys to attract the best companies when you're competing with suddenly thousands of other people around around the world what does it is make it's it's becoming a very crowded space it's true I mean only in our last call this year we analyzed something like a hundred 50 startups in the IOT and data space only domain I mean it's a significant number of startups of course out of the 850 we easily find that half of these probably is not are not fitting in what we are looking for but I think that this year we spoke and we change information with around 350 400 startups from a lot of countries all around the wall then we nail down the database and we try to so the point is that the space is so crowded as I said before and sometimes for entrepreneurs so difficult to understand which is the right choice for me right I mean in some times they are much more focused in trying to understand how much money these guys are going to offer to me any change of how much equity right not paying attention in order to understand what they can get from the program right the reality is that becoming more and more difficult to attractive especially there are locations are very crowd like London or Berlin to move teams and waved on these kind of locations it's very difficult but at the end eme were provided the point is that you have to devote much more efforts I mean you have to put many more resources this year we have like 780 sculptors working for four months trying to find the best things because you have to get in contact with these teams there are in Poland or in Russia and you have to explain then the value that you can provide to them because it's for them as I said before it's very difficult you take a look to the website of Loretta Sullivan looks at same thing so but this is a very economical deal for us right I mean it's well but it's not about this I mean it's about all the things I mean where are the resources that you are gonna get which about the program what you're gonna do during the 90 days who are the guys that are involved in the simulator with your background so all the things to share with these themes but it's an effort that you have to do in order to be able to share with these guys and help them to take a decision and this this again does something with the business model as well you know when you can't find enough great companies to enter your accelerator and the oil companies are just divided all over Europe how will this evolve you know in the next years if two gets it gets harder and harder and harder to attract good companies how will what do you think Patrizio well if you look at what we do really we are reactive in terms of intellect amid self we are reactive if we find a team that we feel it's the right team and they have the right product then we invest resources but as Bernardo say we don't have a specific number of startup that we are looking forward to accelerate or incubate each year so we are open to find an opportunity and then invest on that opportunity on the other hand since that is a reactive strategy then we decided to come up with a venture wielder because that's a deliberate strategy for us so there we don't wait for capturing talent or acquire in Thailand we just go behind a company or create in a company that we will live in because we see that the trend is correct the technology is the right time to invest technology etcetera etcetera so in that regard we are not waiting for we're not scouting to find the right talent with the right idea which is a more difficult thing to find I mean we are first developing idea then we are finding the talent but if you want to find both all together that's what it's becoming more and more difficult so what we do is we bring together both and we are very good and we can be very good we live and we are doing some some progress in that we are creating the opportunity finding the talent it's a different thing we think we can do it as well but if we do this in a separated way we think we can be more successful and it's going to be for us easier to deliver a sustainable business model in time right you're not scouting scouting at all for companies anymore how are you picking because I venture builder like how are you picking your projects how are you getting in touch with entrepreneurs so we don't get in touch with inter we used to do it in the past and we devoted a lot of resources to listen to projects and to meeting enterpreneurs and that's a full-time job and it gets it requires a lot of reserve time and it's one of the most important parts of any accelerator because it's were you get in contact with your deal flow and where you can select well and an accelerator it's all about tilt flow and selecting so it's a very important part so we don't we're no longer an accelerator so we don't don't devote resources to to screen projects or see enterpreneurs anymore so what we do is we spend some time investigating markets and we do we plan with the business plans with your experiments on exit which is very easy and and then we study we're continuously connected and studying the opportunities around the world without raising money that are trendy for some reason and we try to extrapolate it in other markets so that's where we are spending our resources right now we are analyzing market and of course from evening and what we're trying to do is we're trying to attract talent but not talent of interpreters a ton of people who can do things so we love techie people we love developers we love marketers we think that's a hard thing the hard thing is to be able to do things by yourself and then anyone can become an entrepreneur one day so the idea is not a hard thing but finding people that can actually do it exactly so so so we're not focusing anymore on the idea at all so we don't want ideas we don't want projects we don't want Beach no and we want people that it's interesting that they can do things and we are analyzing the markets because there are so many opportunities out there so at some point we try to mix them together and Anthony's is very important not only for accellerate or benji builder and any kind of player that we want to help to set up business from intrapreneurs with startups to have a pretty good understanding of the market I mean is we are in a very dynamic market things are changing so fast so have good understanding and devote a lot of resources a lot of time in trying to understand what's next why this is next is really relevant and at the end of the day we also need excellent people in order to execute these kind of things but it's very important to understand the space or the domain that you want to play exactly then when you deploy started from from sort of bootcamp after like a finished program do you look at it you know three months happy or a year after and say this was a success this was a success acceleration or do you have to wait until you see an exit or an extras acquisition or well a deep at the end is ready with the startups depends how you measure success right that could be most of the people used to say how much money does it start to raise and we have pretty good numbers you can go to our website or how many customers or how successful the company from the sales point of view for me that is another great or another number that is very good is how many of the starters that have gone through our programs after X many years are still alive and we have a number that are in our website that eighteen right now is 82 percent of the 350 or whatever startups that have gone through our programs our life it's an average but after seven eight years there is a big number of starters that are alive and and I think that this is a combination of a lot of things probably number one is is the selection with Julia I mean we spend a lot of resources in trying to bring the best guys mainly the best guys number two is the program I mean our program has been growing I mean we have been learning when you are doing this for a lot of years you understand the things that we have to do and the things that you don't have to right but the main goal for our paren is to really help these startups early stages start after they already have some product or maybe some initial traction this is what we are looking for to really find the product feet on the market feet what we are trying to do most of the starters they fail because they are not able to find the product via the market fit right then they then they have a lot of friction in order to get sales or revenues or users so friction no significant traction so no investor trust you because you don't have significant traction and then good game over okay so our main goal during the program that's why I use a word processor or a structure but also our big network of contacts is to help these guys to move your assumptions to a real product feed market feed company and because at the end of the day you wouldn't start up I mean you have your network you are your co-founders your network of 10 15 people around you and you are trying to base the in basing the assumptions or what you believe what you think and the people around you that unfortunately is not you know right because you're trying to build something that pretend to be disruptive or pretend to captured a big portion of the market well the likelihood that you and your small group is going to be able to do the so is a chance so we we put then in our process we allow them to have contact with a lot of people with paraphilias people in order to validate all these assumptions and do this Lean Startup and test and to iterate and to change a lot of things in order to by the end of the program hopefully having then much more close to the bottom feeder market because you have a much better for the feeder market feed well you might be kind of super great company or not but the chances on the likelihood to be to stay in the market it's gonna be much more high yeah and Barcelona as a city we're all in Barcelona we're all operating from Barcelona a city that's growing very rapidly in terms of startups innovation and also accelerators incubators and venture builders but not what do you think is it a good thing for a city in itself to have a lot of these players active when I talk to people at events and around the city people saying oh I didn't know it was so many accelerators here like this is a very positive thing but for the accelerators itself probably you would want to be the only one that's here right so what what do you think do you think it's it's a good thing or I do think it's a good thing for society in general and for for enterpreneurs of course they have bigger choice so I think it's good that there are 2,000 accelerators and and if there were 20,000 it would be better another thing is that accelerators are sustainable and profitable business models that's another separate issue but I think it's very good that we give resources to people that is thinking on starting an idea and they have no clue whatsoever where to start from and so any kind of help you can give to these people at these stages it it helps a lot yeah you you are moving more out over to the boutique kind of doing an acceleration or as a venture Bueller as you call it and all the accelerators are basically they have different type of programs but they look kind of similar from from the outside do you think more accelerators will you know evolve into this venture a builder thing or how do you see in the next five years well it's funny because you have here two different two different people that started in sort of different ways but I think we are both going to the same model but not on myself on there Hannah hell started up with a different model but with a better branding and better well-known company all over Europe so and and he's very niche oriented very vertically oriented so I think those are the two models are will probably prevail I don't think there is the traditional accelerators that just bring mentors into the companies I don't think that could be sustainable over time unless there are migrating towards helping companies develop their own in in company programs which is for example what what connector is doing I think that would help a lot with sustainability for for them but I think in the end in my perspective is that the best model for some type of people for example in our case or a case of permit is the company wheeler I mean we feel more comfortable with that model we believe that we can create a lot of value with that model and well our progress so far is make me make me think that we are on there on the right track right and there's always a lot of developers and entrepreneurs watching and listening to this podcast and I'm he'll do people that are thinking should I enter an accelerator is this the right choice to me in your opinion what kind of startup what what do you need to have to apply for an accelerator what do you think well as we said before I mean there are different types of a Cerritos I think the first thing I will I will tell the entrepreneurs is to do the homework I mean to understand the stage that they are right now to understand any accelerator what they are looking for their oscillators or incubators that they are targeting pre acceleration companies or pre idea or idea state so there are different states at these early days of the companies they have to understand what they are in because different accelerators are targeting to different kind of teams or the different kind of companies so the first thing is to do your homework try to understand which are the cell raters incubators or venture builders that are really fitting in what you are right now second thing is trying to understand how these guys are going to help me I mean it's to really the same way that the when you are trying to raise money you try to understand more and more the investors do the same thing with the cell rate or try to understand who are the guys behind rado behind incubator behind the venture builder what's your bag down how are you planning to help me be very soft stick with that because it's some kind of Mario's most of these relationship ends with an equity a change so it's going to be your partner it's not going to be for the next three months it's gonna be forever so do your homework and and to be honest I mean the teams are much more successful where the teams are were much more demanding at the beginning right being very why you're gonna help me what are the things that you're gonna me can't you this kind of list of things is something that you believe that we can achieve within the program trying to understand what are the outcomes of the program it's not yes go to website apply online I mean try to have these one on one interviews and in my experience the best things are the ones are much more demanding trying to understand what are gonna be the outcome of the stellarator and is there any like misconceptions of startups applying that they're thinking that you can can give them something that you can't give them there are a lot of misconceptions and I think this is one of the issues of the of the accelerators I mean I agree with Bernard saying that as much as we can it's going to be great it's as far as all of them can deliver enough quality value because this is at the installation that is not a clear definition right Nessa said before I mean most entrepreneurs are confused what doesn't mean I mean it's gonna be a table and one mentor coming two days a week or whatever is gonna be like we do 30 workshops 15 people really helping me every day plus 80 mentor whatever so it's not clear so I mean it's good to have a lot of a straight or Sieben in Barcelona as far as most of think and deliver enough level of quality because if not intrapreneurs are joining this straight to the may be is not delivering enough level of quality and there is a bad feeling right and this is then affecting the others that we are trying to do in a proper way right right we are not talking about model here that is a pre accelerator which is what start narrator is something where entrepreneurs can come and come be there for at least six weeks can have an exposition to Mentors but we are not requiring any equity from them or any kind of payment in any kind of mining right so basically we are just giving to that yeah so that's how good thing for them I mean for entrepreneurs in order to for the less experienced people to take and to have a first feeling of what it is to win in an accelerator so I think this kind of program is also a good thing for people with without experience but if you have some more experience and you've been already into a pre accelerator or some other experience which could help then it's a matter of finding out exactly what is that you are going to be given from that program in particular and see if it really matches what you really need and you have some success stories as well like also like it it Megan and startup bootcamp what are like the factors within these companies that that you call them success stories well it depends also it begins by the entrepreneur by the entrepreneurial team I think it's one of the most important elements the other element is the the sector in which they are in and the time in which they got into that into that sector we have a very good experience in e-commerce there was a company that was astir have five years ago and we have a also very bad story on another ecommerce company that started like two years or three years ago so the thing is three years ago for a fashion equivalence for example was too late and there was a that thing was very rude but the opportunity we probably wasn't there anymore because solando was already there with a huge investment and asus was already the UK so it wasn't anymore an opportunity despite the team was I would team deliver you know what they had to deliver so I guess if you take a look at those two issues you probably have fifty percent of the issues you need to take a look already there then there are other other issues like for example the capability of the team to get investment which is obviously something very very important as well but I would say those three issues are probably the most important ones in my case it is clear everybody is saying in all levels of the chain right intrapreneur is the most important thing right but I think it's much more important in this kind of vehicles we're talking about when you build the roster orators to have someone open-minded I mean flexible and with the ability to listen the ability to because his cell rate or some bunch of business all about that I mean this is that is now initial business plan that is going to be made so the things are gonna change so and things are going to change much better if you are listening and you are learning from what you are getting so you ask him be forming with it what you have to look at the decelerator or a venture builder when you are looking for I also mean they also have to take a look inside and so if they are ready to really go through this kind of process because I mean is there are people I you know listening I mean these people are saying I'm listening you but they are not listening me right and it's not that we have to take your decision but you have to be open-minded open to change flexible those are very important skills that you should have if you want to be part of one of one of these companies of process right and how is it for you to because but not said that we are interested in getting talent like developers marketers the best ones but but you usually start with my idea right you usually start with the entrepreneur when you take people in how do you I make sure that they have the right kind of talent already inside the team all it's a combination of a lot of things and something that you developed from time to time to really understand yes for you to put an example during our selection process I mean as I said before I mean we start with a big thing a big database and we nail down and at the end we finish with inviting 20 teams to parcel enough to stay for the week with us from this year we have 20 teams fronting was 12 different countries Australia Hindi and so on so with these two days we do a lot of things for instance one of the things that we do is to have some psychologist interview in these these people I mean is what something that we learn from this period is trying to understand if because someone could be a good entrepreneur but at the end we need a team is that in gonna be able to work together well it's another layer of information in order to validate this make sense or not right and but not for many when I speak people venture builder is something a bit cryptic it's a bit new and a venture builder it's not given that everybody knows what that is right away but we just started a new company at evening is called factorial can you tell us a bit the process I guess this is a process that you haven't done yet but like how do you plan to help this company within it Nick how do you plan to support a new company because it's a bit special we start something right now so you say Ben to build it is cryptic it's because we give fancy names to things yeah it used to be a group of companies right it's a growth companies and so how do how does it work it doesn't have a fixed way to work and that's why we don't have a program or you know and so we try to look for talent continuously to work in our startups and we do events with the workshops with our kind of stuff like other accelerators would do and but our goal is to find talent to work in our startups and then since we start the relationship with these people a professional relationship in in in all of our startups we start understanding how do they perform and how do they work in marketing in development whatever and then when once we know these people we know how to perform we know how do they work in their teams then we are in a better position and to think of investing on those people so that's your final or final stats through professional relationship we work together and then we consider why don't we start a company together so it's the opposite way right so we try to look for performance people who do worse you know and then we at the same time we analyze markets and we come up with ideas and we have limited resources we cannot be starting everything in the world like maybe drugget internet - no hmm so we try to the boat or small resources to the biggest opportunities we find and that's how it works we also get in contact with our with a network of investors that that are very related to - to what we do and they invested a cleaner companies so we never we never wanted to raise money in it Nick so we would have a problem a conflict of interest because then we would have to accept projects and look for projects and and we would have to enter projects in a certain amount of time so we try our investors - we tell our investors to invest directly in our companies and we are focused solely completely on growing our companies and and growing or companies as a business because that's you talked before about misconceptions I think one of the biggest misconceptions is that getting funded is growing your business and this happens a lot with mental builder and an accelerator so we have a sort of a conflict of interest here because and we think that our business model ultimately is is exiting companies and having two turns and equity so and we push sometimes companies to get funded two three value and to get revalued and raise the value of the company and then or returns an equity are bigger but for business to make sense I the purpose is to grow as a business so to make the business sustainable but also scalable and and that should be the ultimate goal not finding and over funding and over funding which is what is happening and sometimes and it creates sort of small bubbles in different sectors so I think that the purpose of a business is to grow with as little resources as possible and with as little dilution as possible great that was everything we had time for unfortunately forty-five minutes go by fast but let's stay tuned for our next podcast in in December remember that you can catch the highlights from from this podcast in video form on on ethnic blog and or on our Facebook and everywhere we are online thank you again uh elevation but not for coming I really appreciate taking your time you are all very busy so I really appreciate it and my name is Sandra oblong and I remember to follow ethnic for for more quality tech discussions also in the future [Music]

Descripción

You can also read the blog post here: http://buff.ly/2gHfTv2

In our November podcast we talked about how the increasing number of accelerators are making it harder and harder to produce winner programs. An emergence of venture builders or company builders, focusing on fewer projects with a deeper focus on each project, is maybe what more and more accelerators will turn into. We invited Angel Garcia, director of Startupbootcamp IoT, Data and Cybersecurity, Patricio Hunt, Managing partner of Intelectium and Bernat Farrero, president of itnig to discuss the topic.

Check us out on social media:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/itnig/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/itnig
LinkedIn: http://buff.ly/2gHaXGr
Webiste: http://itnig.net


Visit our blog for more great startup content: https://blog.itnig.net/

We're always looking for talent to join our teams, check out: http://itnig.net/jobs.html

For weekly startup videos subscribe to our channel.

Company builders
Venture Builders
Startup Builders
Startup accelerators
Startup accelerators in Spain
How to join an accelerator

Captions con timestamps

Mostrar captions con tiempo
[00:02] [Music]
[00:15] 
[00:15] welcome  to  the  ethnic  podcast  and  my
[00:17] 
[00:17] name  is  Sandra  Holland  today  we  will
[00:19] 
[00:19] discuss  the  differences  between  startup
[00:21] 
[00:21] accelerators  incubators  and  venture
[00:23] 
[00:23] builders  if  they  work  for  startups  and
[00:25] 
[00:25] if  so  what's  the  success  factors  and
[00:27] 
[00:27] we're  super  lucky  to  have  with  us  some
[00:30] 
[00:30] great  people  we  had  angle  Garcia
[00:32] 
[00:32] director  of  startup  bootcamp  IOT  data
[00:34] 
[00:34] and  cybersecurity  was  a  Patricio  Hunt
[00:37] 
[00:37] managing  partner  of  intellectual  and
[00:39] 
[00:39] also  the  ethnic  president  Pernod  Ferraro
[00:41] 
[00:41] welcome  to  you  all  thank  you  be  here  so
[00:46] 
[00:46] to  start  off  with  young  he'll  you've
[00:50] 
[00:50] been  involved  with  startup  bootcamp  for
[00:52] 
[00:52] a  while  now  couple  years  you  also
[00:54] 
[00:54] invested  in  a  couple  of  the  projects
[00:56] 
[00:56] yourself
[00:58] 
[00:58] what  is  it  that  you  find  so  interesting
[01:00] 
[01:00] with  with  this  type  of  program  compared
[01:03] 
[01:03] to  just  regular  seed  funding
[01:05] 
[01:05] well  I  finished  our  different  things  I
[01:09] 
[01:09] mean  city  funded  our  cellar  a  toes  and
[01:10] 
[01:10] incubators  there  are  a  lot  of  animals
[01:12] 
[01:12] probably  we're  going  to  discuss  it  in
[01:14] 
[01:14] the  during  the  podcasts  are  completely
[01:17] 
[01:17] different  things  Anthony's  a  serratus
[01:19] 
[01:19] are  to  some  extent  trying  to  prepare
[01:22] 
[01:22] these  teams  sometimes  even  don't  even
[01:25] 
[01:25] companies  these  teams  to  be  some  kind  of
[01:28] 
[01:28] investable
[01:29] 
[01:29] company  or  an  investable  startup  right
[01:32] 
[01:32] so  we  are  early  I  think  in  the  in  the
[01:36] 
[01:36] process  of  the  funding  so  I  don't  think
[01:38] 
[01:38] that  we  have  to  compare  such  investment
[01:40] 
[01:40] with  celery  toes  or  a  complete  different
[01:42] 
[01:42] animals  the  things  that  we  are  looking
[01:43] 
[01:43] for  our  different
[01:45] 
[01:45] I'm  probably  something  that  we're  going
[01:47] 
[01:47] to  discuss  today  right  right  what  are
[01:50] 
[01:50] you  finding  appealing  with  with  these
[01:52] 
[01:52] kind  of  programs  what  what  are  the  big
[01:53] 
[01:53] pros  for  you  well  as  a  personal  level
[01:58] 
[01:58] accelerator  is  something  that  you  are
[02:00] 
[02:00] really  much  more  deep  into  the  people  I
[02:04] 
[02:04] mean  it's  a  lot  about  the  personal
[02:07] 
[02:07] relationship  I  mean  really  helping  in  a
[02:09] 
[02:09] day  to  day  basis  to  these  guys
[02:12] 
[02:12] son  invested  I  mean  you  take  some
[02:13] 
[02:13] distance  right  them  is  much  more  a
[02:15] 
[02:15] financial  investment  it's  also  a
[02:17] 
[02:17] financial  investment  foreign  selector
[02:19] 
[02:19] but  these  are  other  much  more  personal
[02:21] 
[02:21] factors  I  mean  you  mean  you're  gonna
[02:23] 
[02:23] really  try  to  help  these  guys  to  make
[02:27] 
[02:27] the  dream  a  reality  right  this  is  you
[02:29] 
[02:29] are  going  to  the  personal  level  so  it's
[02:32] 
[02:32] something  much  more  much  more  personal
[02:34] 
[02:34] that  when  you  are  I  get  an  investor  then
[02:36] 
[02:36] you  start  to  have  your  legal
[02:37] 
[02:37] implications  and  your  financial
[02:39] 
[02:39] rules  and  this  kind  of  thing  so  you're
[02:42] 
[02:42] moving  to  a  different  level  I  think  that
[02:44] 
[02:44] both
[02:45] 
[02:45] elements  are  necessary  in  an  ecosystem
[02:49] 
[02:49] but  are
[02:51] 
[02:51] doing  different  things  and  act  in  a
[02:54] 
[02:54] different  stage
[02:56] 
[02:56] and  petitio  you  have  a  different
[02:59] 
[02:59] approach  more  than  like  a  traditional
[03:01] 
[03:01] accelerator  with  a  six  month  program
[03:03] 
[03:03] right  tell  us  a  little  bit  about  your
[03:06] 
[03:06] approach  to  startups  and  how  startups
[03:07] 
[03:07] approach  you  well  we  have  different
[03:09] 
[03:09] models  actually  because  we  running  the
[03:12] 
[03:12] tech  stars  startup  next  program  which  is
[03:15] 
[03:15] a  traditional  program  or  you  have  a
[03:18] 
[03:18] selection  process  in  the  beginning
[03:19] 
[03:19] applicants  that  are  interested  in  in
[03:23] 
[03:23] getting  in  etc  and  that's  a  batch
[03:25] 
[03:25] process  and  we  do  it  twice  a  year  and
[03:28] 
[03:28] then  we  have  our
[03:30] 
[03:30] let's  say  our  own  boutique  accelerator
[03:34] 
[03:34] which  is  Internet  tube  and  there  we  do
[03:36] 
[03:36] whatever  we  think  is  best  for  our
[03:38] 
[03:38] company  and  depends  a  lot  in  the
[03:41] 
[03:41] context  of  the  company  the  team  the
[03:44] 
[03:44] stage  of  the  company  our  interest  in  the
[03:48] 
[03:48] company  as  well  so  we  do  a  very
[03:50] 
[03:50] different  thing  there  we  usually  do  one
[03:53] 
[03:53] or  two  companies  every  year  only  that
[03:55] 
[03:55] we  really  do  a  let's  say  we  do  a  custom
[04:01] 
[04:01] fit  program  and  we  just  concentrate  on
[04:04] 
[04:04] what  the  team  really  needs  and  it's  a
[04:06] 
[04:06] very  different  approach  so  why  did  you
[04:09] 
[04:09] choose  this  approach  instead  of  as  you
[04:12] 
[04:12] are  affiliated  with  the  tech  stars  the
[04:13] 
[04:13] more  traditional  program  what  did  you
[04:15] 
[04:15] choose  to  do  this  kind  of  thing
[04:16] 
[04:16] basically  we  are  doing  things  us  as  we
[04:21] 
[04:21] see  there  require  in  the  rhythm  is  not
[04:25] 
[04:25] something  that  we  have  a  device  in  a
[04:28] 
[04:28] very  specific  way  we  are  always  sort  of
[04:32] 
[04:32] innovating  on  the  periphery  of  the  of
[04:34] 
[04:34] things  and  we  are  looking  finding
[04:38] 
[04:38] exactly  what  are  the  best  opportunities
[04:41] 
[04:41] that  we  have  there  and  we  go  behind
[04:43] 
[04:43] those  opportunities  at  the  same  time  for
[04:45] 
[04:45] example  last  year  we  founded  a  mobile
[04:48] 
[04:48] venture  builder  because  we  thought  there
[04:51] 
[04:51] was  a
[04:51] 
[04:51] perhaps  a  more  interesting  model  for  us
[04:55] 
[04:55] and  it  was  probably  a  model  that  was
[04:59] 
[04:59] better  for  our  skills  so  now  we  are  very
[05:03] 
[05:03] focused  on  that  program  as  well  and  we
[05:06] 
[05:06] are  doing  things  as  they  are  coming  to
[05:09] 
[05:09] us  and  taking  opportunities  mostly
[05:11] 
[05:11] rather  than  how  very
[05:13] 
[05:13] let's  say  focus  strategy  based  on
[05:16] 
[05:16] exactly  things  that  we  think  are
[05:20] 
[05:20] that  we  have  to  do  I  mean  we're  more
[05:23] 
[05:23] open  to  innovation  rather  than  designing
[05:26] 
[05:26] what  we  want  to  exactly  and  talking
[05:29] 
[05:29] about  venture  builders  but  not  you  used
[05:32] 
[05:32] to  be  ethnic  used  to  be  a  very
[05:34] 
[05:34] traditional  accelerator  used  to  call  it
[05:36] 
[05:36] the  hacker  accelerator  once  but  but  it
[05:39] 
[05:39] changed  a  bit  the  last  time  can  you  tell
[05:43] 
[05:43] us  about  what  has  to  change  and  when  you
[05:45] 
[05:45] speak  to  people  now  what  do  you  call  it
[05:47] 
[05:47] Nick  hmm  so  we  never  meant  to  be  a
[05:49] 
[05:49] traditional  accelerator  so  that's  why  we
[05:51] 
[05:51] call  it  the  hacker  accelerator
[05:54] 
[05:54] but  basically  what  we  did  what  we  did  in
[05:57] 
[05:57] our  short  span  of  life  is  experimenting
[06:00] 
[06:00] so  we  tried  different  models  and  we
[06:03] 
[06:03] experimented  and  we  reached  to  the
[06:06] 
[06:06] conclusion  that  a  fixed  program  with  a
[06:11] 
[06:11] set  of  mentors  with  a  certain  amount  of
[06:13] 
[06:13] resources  devoted  to  each  project  and
[06:16] 
[06:16] with  the  need  of  having  to  do  n  number
[06:20] 
[06:20] of  projects  every  n  number  of  time
[06:23] 
[06:23] was  not  possible  for  us
[06:26] 
[06:26] we  studied  the  mother  we  analyzed  it  and
[06:29] 
[06:29] we  realized  that  it  was  not  possible  at
[06:31] 
[06:31] least  for  us  and  so  we  decided  to  move
[06:35] 
[06:35] away  from  this  model  and  and  start
[06:37] 
[06:37] companies  and  commit  about  committing
[06:40] 
[06:40] the  companies  that  we  were  growing  so
[06:42] 
[06:42] increasing  our  participation  and  our
[06:44] 
[06:44] effort  in  smaller  companies  instead  of
[06:47] 
[06:47] doing  a  model  based  on  quantity  time
[06:51] 
[06:51] statistics  so  we  we  tried  to  focus  on
[06:55] 
[06:55] smaller  projects  on  a  small  number  of
[06:57] 
[06:57] projects  and
[06:59] 
[06:59] then  commit  on  these  projects  forever
[07:02] 
[07:02] not  just  for  a  period  of  time  but  making
[07:06] 
[07:06] sure  that  if  we  are  something  and  we
[07:10] 
[07:10] take  something  out  of  this  project  it
[07:12] 
[07:12] will  be  along  with  the  other
[07:14] 
[07:14] enterpreneurs  that  are  that  are  doing  it
[07:16] 
[07:16] so  we  we  take  big  bigger  stakes  in  the
[07:20] 
[07:20] companies  that  we  work  and  we  take  full
[07:22] 
[07:22] responsibility  we  don't  look  for  winners
[07:24] 
[07:24] we  make  them  and  we  make  winner  teams
[07:27] 
[07:27] and  winner  projects  we  are  continuously
[07:30] 
[07:30] striving  to  find  the  greatest  talent  and
[07:35] 
[07:35] we  take  responsibility  of  funding  the
[07:37] 
[07:37] projects  of  of  the  success  of  the
[07:39] 
[07:39] project  in  the  long  term  hmm  so  that's  a
[07:42] 
[07:42] difference  in  the  mother  we  then  we
[07:44] 
[07:44] don't  participate  in  a  bad  way  in  a  very
[07:45] 
[07:45] early  stage  in  a  short  amount  or  close
[07:49] 
[07:49] amount  of  time  and  we  take
[07:51] 
[07:51] responsibility  almost  forever  in  the
[07:54] 
[07:54] projects  right  then  okay  you  have  been
[07:57] 
[07:57] sorry  to  campus  is  one  of  the  more
[07:59] 
[07:59] successful
[08:00] 
[08:00] accelerators  in  Europe  one  would  say  and
[08:03] 
[08:03] but  but  the  business  model  business
[08:06] 
[08:06] model  itself  as  Bernard  says  they  went
[08:08] 
[08:08] away  from  it  that  was  their  own  choice
[08:11] 
[08:11] but  but  how  are  you  looking  at  the
[08:13] 
[08:13] business  model  do  you  find  it  successful
[08:16] 
[08:16] itself  or  is  it  too  early  to  say  what  do
[08:17] 
[08:17] you  think
[08:19] 
[08:19] it's  a  very  good  question  because  the
[08:21] 
[08:21] thing  that  the  other  day  I  was  speaking
[08:23] 
[08:23] well  I  don't  remember  what  it  was  but  he
[08:25] 
[08:25] was  talking  about  the  salah  laid  off
[08:27] 
[08:27] right  and  i  did  some  kind  of  research
[08:29] 
[08:29] about  and  i  find  out  that  what  it  was  at
[08:32] 
[08:32] angel  is  that  there  are  two  thousand
[08:34] 
[08:34] accelerators  in  the  world  which  is  not
[08:36] 
[08:36] true  it's  not  true  which  is  true  is  the
[08:40] 
[08:40] there  are  2,000  companies  or  entities
[08:42] 
[08:42] that  are  claiming  to  be  an  accelerator
[08:44] 
[08:44] because  at  the  end  of  the  day  I  mean  you
[08:46] 
[08:46] take  a  look  to  all  these  two  thousand
[08:48] 
[08:48] websites  and  all  of  the  necessary  half
[08:50] 
[08:50] workshops  I  have  mentors  and  I'm  gonna
[08:52] 
[08:52] move  you  to  the  next  level  and  blah  blah
[08:54] 
[08:54] blah  blah  blah  but  at  the  end  the
[08:57] 
[08:57] reality  is  that  most  of  them  they  are
[08:58] 
[08:58] starting  today  and  in  two  years  from  now
[09:01] 
[09:01] and  and  windier  for  now  they  have  to
[09:02] 
[09:02] rethink  about  the  model  because  the
[09:04] 
[09:04] model  is  not  sustainable  yes  by
[09:06] 
[09:06] definition  means  you  are  trying  to  have
[09:07] 
[09:07] some  tables  and  chairs  and  if  you  are
[09:10] 
[09:10] not  don't  have  enough  money  in  order  to
[09:12] 
[09:12] deliver  enough  value  so  you're  trying  to
[09:15] 
[09:15] make  money  with  the  equity  that  you  are
[09:17] 
[09:17] taking  in  these  companies  but  at  the
[09:19] 
[09:19] same  time  you  have  enough  resources  in
[09:21] 
[09:21] order  to  deliver  enough  value  to  these
[09:22] 
[09:22] companies  well  it's  trying  to  do  a
[09:26] 
[09:26] circle  with  that  square  it's  gonna  be  a
[09:28] 
[09:28] challenge  I  think  that  there  are  some
[09:32] 
[09:32] players  out  there  I'm  not  saying  that  we
[09:34] 
[09:34] are  better  or  not  but  we  have  a
[09:35] 
[09:35] different  model  I  mean  we  have  these
[09:37] 
[09:37] corporations  support  in  our  province  and
[09:39] 
[09:39] I'm  talking  not  only  about  to  start  a
[09:40] 
[09:40] boot  camp  but  also  techstars  of  black
[09:42] 
[09:42] and  play  or  the  guys  from  Y  Combinator
[09:44] 
[09:44] of  all  500  starters  in  the  US  that  we
[09:48] 
[09:48] have  these  corporations
[09:50] 
[09:50] investing  or  supporting  our  programs  in
[09:53] 
[09:53] order  to  have  access  to  innovation  and
[09:55] 
[09:55] that's  what  makes  our  business  model
[09:58] 
[09:58] sustainable  I  mean  there  are  few  solar
[10:00] 
[10:00] leaders  in  the  world  that  they  have  been
[10:01] 
[10:01] in  the  market  for  more  than  six  seven
[10:03] 
[10:03] years  around  the  ones  that  are
[10:04] 
[10:04] describing  and  of  course  that  we  are
[10:07] 
[10:07] changing  things  internally  but  we  have
[10:09] 
[10:09] find  out  is  way  a  sustainable  business
[10:12] 
[10:12] model  that  if  you  look  around  is
[10:16] 
[10:16] it's  not  in  others  always  have  to
[10:18] 
[10:18] rethink  about  different  ways  to  do  it
[10:21] 
[10:21] different  ways  to  find
[10:24] 
[10:24] sources  of  finding  in  order  to  be  able
[10:27] 
[10:27] to  get  money  back  from  this  equity  stake
[10:30] 
[10:30] that's  the  set  before  I  mean  we  don't
[10:32] 
[10:32] have  enough  resources  to  invest  in  these
[10:33] 
[10:33] companies  the  likelihood  to  get  a  lot  of
[10:35] 
[10:35] money  from  this  equity  stake  is  right  so
[10:37] 
[10:37] very  poor  right  so  we  have  been  doing
[10:40] 
[10:40] other  things  sorcery  changing  things
[10:42] 
[10:42] focusing  more  and  more  in  the  vertical
[10:44] 
[10:44] thing  right  that  probably  we  are  going
[10:47] 
[10:47] to  speak  later  I  mean  is  one  of  the
[10:48] 
[10:48] futures  of  accelerators  trying  to  be
[10:50] 
[10:50] much  more  specific  in  something
[10:53] 
[10:53] but  again  everything  that  we  have  this
[10:55] 
[10:55] specific  business  model  that  allows  our
[10:57] 
[10:57] to  provide  or  deliver  at  least  more
[11:01] 
[11:01] resources  and  we  believe  that  more  value
[11:03] 
[11:03] that  little  players  in  the  market
[11:05] 
[11:05] positio  you  have  also  been  involved  with
[11:08] 
[11:08] this  traditional  type  of  programs  but  as
[11:12] 
[11:12] we  talked  about  like  the  accelerate
[11:14] 
[11:14] accelerate  that's  all  only  been  around
[11:16] 
[11:16] for  a  couple  of  years  it's  a  fairly  new
[11:19] 
[11:19] new  thing  so  when  when  can  we  say  that
[11:23] 
[11:23] accelerator  is  the  success  at  what  time
[11:26] 
[11:26] is  it  too  early  or  is  it  in  the  future
[11:29] 
[11:29] what  do  you  think  I  think  that  like  who
[11:32] 
[11:32] was  saying  there  are  many  type  of
[11:34] 
[11:34] accelerators  and  you  can  call
[11:36] 
[11:36] accelerators  really  just  a  few  of  them
[11:40] 
[11:40] so  basically  I  think  those  that  are
[11:43] 
[11:43] focused  on  verticals  will  probably  be
[11:47] 
[11:47] more  successful  in  the  long  term  also
[11:50] 
[11:50] the  first  accelerators  the  world  ones
[11:54] 
[11:54] that  are  more  consolidated  like  Y
[11:56] 
[11:56] Combinator  tech  stars  start  at  bootcamp
[11:58] 
[11:58] and  a  few  others  probably  because  they
[12:02] 
[12:02] were  the  first  to  market  and  because
[12:03] 
[12:03] they  have  this  effect  of  being  able  to
[12:05] 
[12:05] select  the  best  companies  all  over  the
[12:07] 
[12:07] world  those  are  probably  going  to  stand
[12:10] 
[12:10] out  and  going  to  continue  in  a  success
[12:13] 
[12:13] for  the  rest  what  you  have  to  do  to  see
[12:16] 
[12:16] if  you  can  find  a  specific  model  that
[12:20] 
[12:20] may  deliver  some  special  value  to  the
[12:24] 
[12:24] companies  that  you  are  looking  for
[12:26] 
[12:26] specifically  but  should  be  like  a  very
[12:29] 
[12:29] very
[12:31] 
[12:31] let's  say  focused  group  of  companies  and
[12:36] 
[12:36] I  guess  those  ones  are  the  ones  that  are
[12:39] 
[12:39] going  to  prevail  right  right  for  us  the
[12:43] 
[12:43] model  let's  say  in  our  case  we've  been
[12:46] 
[12:46] going  from  the  hybrid  custom-fit  sort  of
[12:50] 
[12:50] program  that  we  deliver  we  only  do  that
[12:52] 
[12:52] as  I  said  before  just  for  a  couple  of
[12:55] 
[12:55] companies  perhaps  each  year  and  then  we
[12:59] 
[12:59] also  Bernard  was  saying  we  found  out
[13:02] 
[13:02] these
[13:04] 
[13:04] along  many  years  and  looking  for  well
[13:07] 
[13:07] whatever  the  best  thing  for  us  to  do  and
[13:10] 
[13:10] finally  we  came  to  the  conclusion  that  a
[13:12] 
[13:12] company  will  there  was  in  our  case  the
[13:15] 
[13:15] best  thing  to  to  concentrate  our
[13:18] 
[13:18] deliberate  efforts  on  the  other  hand  as
[13:22] 
[13:22] I  was  saying  also  you  have  to  remain
[13:24] 
[13:24] sort  of  open  to  innovate  on  the
[13:27] 
[13:27] periphery  so  if  they  come  to  us  a  couple
[13:29] 
[13:29] of  teams  every  year  that  we  see  that
[13:32] 
[13:32] they're  really  good  and  we  can  help  them
[13:34] 
[13:34] we  do  that  I  mean  we  help  them  in  the
[13:37] 
[13:37] way  that  they  need  and  in  the  way  that
[13:39] 
[13:39] is  better  for  them  to  eat  we  have  but
[13:43] 
[13:43] our  deliberate  efforts  now  are  just
[13:45] 
[13:45] focus  on  the  company  wielder  which  we
[13:48] 
[13:48] see  that  is  the  best  model  for  us  in
[13:50] 
[13:50] order  to  build  companies  it's  a  kind  of
[13:52] 
[13:52] model  perhaps  it's  more  closer  to
[13:54] 
[13:55] whatever  nut  is  doing  we  we  select
[13:58] 
[13:58] further  we'll  go  all  the  other  way  I
[14:01] 
[14:01] mean  we  select  the  space  in  which  we
[14:03] 
[14:03] want  to  innovate  we  look  for  a  company
[14:07] 
[14:07] that  would  validate  our  concept  then  we
[14:10] 
[14:10] select  the  technology  we  build  the
[14:13] 
[14:13] technology  we  get  traction  in  the  market
[14:16] 
[14:16] and  if  we  get  real  traction  then  we'll
[14:19] 
[14:19] go  and  try  to  find  that  team  that  would
[14:21] 
[14:21] be  able  to  take  this  to  a  success  or  to
[14:24] 
[14:24] a  spin-off  that  could  be  successful  in
[14:26] 
[14:26] the  long  term  so  this  is  a  completely
[14:28] 
[14:28] different  model  we  believe  in  in  our
[14:31] 
[14:31] case  in  particular  that  this  is  the  best
[14:33] 
[14:33] for  us  to  we  believe  that's  the  model
[14:36] 
[14:36] where  we  can  be  more  successful  and  this
[14:39] 
[14:39] is  why  we  do  that  yeah  I  have  a  question
[14:43] 
[14:43] related  to  that  yes  no  please  please  go
[14:46] 
[14:46] ahead  and  I  think  it's  interesting  to
[14:49] 
[14:49] analyze  what  we  define  as  sustainable
[14:51] 
[14:51] and  how  sustainable  is  a  goal  by  itself
[14:55] 
[14:55] so  is  it  is  it  not  profitable  the  goal
[14:58] 
[14:58] of  any  business  so  shouldn't  we  create
[15:01] 
[15:01] profitable  business  but  still  and  I
[15:05] 
[15:05] would  like  to  understand  how  an
[15:07] 
[15:07] accelerator  can  be  sustainable  and  and
[15:10] 
[15:10] how  an  accelerator  can  be  profitable  on
[15:12] 
[15:12] what's  a  ball  and  what's  the  time  span
[15:14] 
[15:14] needed  for  that  so  I  think  that  those
[15:16] 
[15:16] are  the  biggest  questions  I'd  realizes
[15:19] 
[15:19] in  the  world  even  the  first  accelerators
[15:21] 
[15:21] in  2005  Paula  Hammond  started  Dominator
[15:25] 
[15:25] think  tech  stuff  was  one  year  later  no
[15:27] 
[15:27] something  like  that  2006  and  these  are
[15:30] 
[15:30] the  old  examples  the  oldest  from  them
[15:33] 
[15:33] many  accelerators  appeared  as  you  said
[15:36] 
[15:36] and  but  I  think  none  of  them  are  still
[15:39] 
[15:39] or  have  enough  track  record  today  to  say
[15:42] 
[15:42] that  they  are  profitable  business  models
[15:44] 
[15:44] even  Y  Combinator  so  to  say  they  are
[15:48] 
[15:48] profitable  you  have  to  set  and  expect  an
[15:50] 
[15:50] expectation  at  some  point  and  you  have
[15:53] 
[15:53] to  fit  this  expectation  but  Y  Combinator
[15:55] 
[15:55] grow  so  big  that  they  get  increasing
[15:58] 
[15:58] their  expectation  so  now  they  even
[16:01] 
[16:01] expect  to  be  way  more  weak  and  they  are
[16:04] 
[16:04] getting  the  best  deal  flow  in  the  world
[16:05] 
[16:05] so  when  it's  an  accelerator  well  when
[16:08] 
[16:08] can  we  call  an  accelerator  a  sustainable
[16:11] 
[16:11] business  model  or  a  profitable  business
[16:13] 
[16:13] model  is  it  mean  does  it  mean  that  you
[16:15] 
[16:15] have  a  source  for  investment  that  keeps
[16:18] 
[16:18] coming  or  or  whatever  you  mean  to  your
[16:21] 
[16:21] uncle  for  example  or  a  sustainable  model
[16:24] 
[16:24] is  something  that  you  can  keep  in  the
[16:25] 
[16:25] time  right  something  that  you  can  keep
[16:27] 
[16:27] doing  for  a  lot  of  time  sure  and  I  think
[16:29] 
[16:29] all  these  models  are  clearly  sustainable
[16:32] 
[16:32] because  they  have  been  in  the  market  for
[16:33] 
[16:33] a  lot  of  period  of  time  don't  thing
[16:35] 
[16:35] about  that  the  model  is  only  to  make
[16:37] 
[16:37] money  with  the  equity  in  the  companies
[16:39] 
[16:39] they  are  also  making  money  with  the
[16:40] 
[16:40] corporations  and
[16:42] 
[16:42] but  I  think  the  the  the  best  way  to  look
[16:45] 
[16:45] at  that  I  mean  these  guys  have  been  in
[16:46] 
[16:46] the  market  for  a  long  time  all  the  guys
[16:48] 
[16:48] are  not  longer  in  the  market  so  there
[16:51] 
[16:51] are  guys  that  are  sustainable  the  guys
[16:52] 
[16:52] are  not  sustainable
[16:54] 
[16:54] and  we're  talking  about  all  these  guys
[16:57] 
[16:57] in  the  market  it's  a  big  group  nearly
[16:59] 
[16:59] 2,000  accelerators  yeah  you're  trying  to
[17:02] 
[17:02] get  the  best  talent  to  startup  bootcamp
[17:04] 
[17:04] every  year  or  every  a  for  every  program
[17:06] 
[17:06] doesn't  it  make  it  harder  for  you  guys
[17:09] 
[17:09] to  attract  the  best  companies  when
[17:11] 
[17:11] you're  competing  with  suddenly  thousands
[17:13] 
[17:13] of  other  people  around  around  the  world
[17:15] 
[17:15] what  does  it  is  make
[17:17] 
[17:17] it's  it's  becoming  a  very  crowded  space
[17:21] 
[17:21] it's  true  I  mean  only  in  our  last  call
[17:24] 
[17:24] this  year  we  analyzed  something  like  a
[17:26] 
[17:26] hundred  50  startups
[17:28] 
[17:28] in  the  IOT  and  data  space  only  domain  I
[17:32] 
[17:32] mean  it's  a  significant  number  of
[17:34] 
[17:34] startups  of  course  out  of  the  850  we
[17:37] 
[17:37] easily  find  that  half  of  these  probably
[17:39] 
[17:39] is  not  are  not  fitting  in  what  we  are
[17:42] 
[17:42] looking  for  but  I  think  that  this  year
[17:44] 
[17:44] we  spoke  and  we  change  information  with
[17:47] 
[17:47] around  350  400  startups  from  a  lot  of
[17:51] 
[17:51] countries  all  around  the  wall
[17:53] 
[17:53] then  we  nail  down  the  database  and  we
[17:56] 
[17:56] try  to  so  the  point  is  that
[17:58] 
[17:58] the  space  is  so  crowded  as  I  said  before
[18:01] 
[18:01] and  sometimes  for  entrepreneurs  so
[18:03] 
[18:03] difficult  to  understand  which  is  the
[18:05] 
[18:05] right  choice  for  me  right  I  mean  in  some
[18:07] 
[18:07] times  they  are  much  more  focused  in
[18:09] 
[18:09] trying  to  understand  how  much  money
[18:10] 
[18:10] these  guys  are  going  to  offer  to  me  any
[18:12] 
[18:13] change  of  how  much  equity  right  not
[18:16] 
[18:16] paying  attention  in  order  to  understand
[18:17] 
[18:17] what  they  can  get  from  the  program  right
[18:21] 
[18:21] the  reality  is  that  becoming  more  and
[18:25] 
[18:25] more  difficult  to  attractive
[18:28] 
[18:28] especially  there  are  locations  are  very
[18:30] 
[18:30] crowd  like  London  or  Berlin  to  move
[18:33] 
[18:33] teams  and  waved  on  these  kind  of
[18:35] 
[18:35] locations  it's  very  difficult
[18:38] 
[18:38] but  at  the  end  eme  were  provided  the
[18:40] 
[18:40] point  is  that  you  have  to  devote  much
[18:43] 
[18:43] more  efforts  I  mean  you  have  to  put  many
[18:45] 
[18:45] more  resources  this  year  we  have  like
[18:48] 
[18:48] 780  sculptors  working  for  four  months
[18:50] 
[18:50] trying  to  find  the  best  things  because
[18:53] 
[18:53] you  have  to  get  in  contact  with  these
[18:54] 
[18:54] teams  there  are  in  Poland  or  in  Russia
[18:57] 
[18:57] and  you  have  to  explain  then  the  value
[18:59] 
[18:59] that  you  can  provide  to  them  because
[19:01] 
[19:01] it's  for  them  as  I  said  before  it's  very
[19:03] 
[19:03] difficult  you  take  a  look  to  the  website
[19:04] 
[19:04] of  Loretta  Sullivan  looks  at  same  thing
[19:06] 
[19:06] so  but  this  is  a  very  economical  deal
[19:09] 
[19:09] for  us  right  I  mean  it's  well  but  it's
[19:11] 
[19:11] not  about  this  I  mean  it's  about  all  the
[19:13] 
[19:13] things  I  mean  where  are  the  resources
[19:14] 
[19:14] that  you  are  gonna  get  which  about  the
[19:16] 
[19:16] program  what  you're  gonna  do  during  the
[19:17] 
[19:17] 90  days  who  are  the  guys  that  are
[19:19] 
[19:19] involved  in  the  simulator  with  your
[19:20] 
[19:20] background  so  all  the  things  to  share
[19:22] 
[19:22] with  these  themes  but  it's  an  effort
[19:24] 
[19:24] that  you  have  to  do  in  order  to  be  able
[19:27] 
[19:27] to  share  with  these  guys  and  help  them
[19:29] 
[19:29] to  take  a  decision  and  this  this  again
[19:32] 
[19:32] does  something  with  the  business  model
[19:33] 
[19:33] as  well  you  know  when  you  can't  find
[19:35] 
[19:35] enough  great  companies  to  enter  your
[19:37] 
[19:37] accelerator  and  the  oil  companies  are
[19:39] 
[19:39] just  divided  all  over  Europe
[19:42] 
[19:42] how  will  this  evolve  you  know  in  the
[19:44] 
[19:44] next  years  if  two  gets  it  gets  harder
[19:46] 
[19:46] and  harder  and  harder  to  attract  good
[19:48] 
[19:48] companies  how  will  what  do  you  think
[19:50] 
[19:50] Patrizio  well
[19:52] 
[19:52] if  you  look  at  what  we  do  really  we  are
[19:55] 
[19:55] reactive  in  terms  of  intellect  amid  self
[19:59] 
[19:59] we  are  reactive  if  we  find  a  team  that
[20:01] 
[20:01] we  feel  it's  the  right  team  and  they
[20:03] 
[20:03] have  the  right  product  then  we  invest
[20:05] 
[20:05] resources  but  as  Bernardo  say  we  don't
[20:08] 
[20:08] have  a  specific  number  of  startup  that
[20:12] 
[20:12] we  are  looking  forward  to
[20:13] 
[20:13] accelerate  or  incubate  each  year  so  we
[20:18] 
[20:18] are  open  to  find  an  opportunity  and  then
[20:21] 
[20:21] invest  on  that  opportunity  on  the  other
[20:24] 
[20:24] hand  since  that  is  a  reactive  strategy
[20:28] 
[20:28] then  we  decided  to  come  up  with  a
[20:30] 
[20:30] venture  wielder  because  that's  a
[20:32] 
[20:32] deliberate  strategy  for  us  so  there  we
[20:35] 
[20:35] don't  wait  for  capturing  talent  or
[20:38] 
[20:38] acquire  in  Thailand  we  just  go  behind  a
[20:41] 
[20:41] company  or  create  in  a  company  that  we
[20:43] 
[20:43] will  live  in  because  we  see  that  the
[20:45] 
[20:45] trend  is  correct  the  technology  is  the
[20:47] 
[20:47] right  time  to  invest  technology  etcetera
[20:49] 
[20:49] etcetera  so  in  that  regard  we  are  not
[20:51] 
[20:51] waiting  for  we're  not  scouting  to  find
[20:55] 
[20:55] the  right  talent  with  the  right  idea
[20:57] 
[20:57] which  is  a  more  difficult  thing  to  find
[21:00] 
[21:00] I  mean  we  are  first  developing  idea  then
[21:03] 
[21:03] we  are  finding  the  talent  but  if  you
[21:05] 
[21:05] want  to  find  both  all  together  that's
[21:08] 
[21:08] what  it's  becoming  more  and  more
[21:10] 
[21:10] difficult  so  what  we  do  is  we  bring
[21:13] 
[21:13] together  both  and  we  are  very  good  and
[21:15] 
[21:15] we  can  be  very  good  we  live  and  we  are
[21:18] 
[21:18] doing  some  some  progress  in  that  we  are
[21:20] 
[21:20] creating  the  opportunity  finding  the
[21:23] 
[21:23] talent  it's  a  different  thing  we  think
[21:25] 
[21:25] we  can  do  it  as  well  but  if  we  do  this
[21:28] 
[21:28] in  a  separated  way  we  think  we  can  be
[21:31] 
[21:31] more  successful  and  it's  going  to  be  for
[21:33] 
[21:33] us  easier  to  deliver  a  sustainable
[21:37] 
[21:37] business  model  in  time  right
[21:39] 
[21:39] you're  not  scouting  scouting  at  all  for
[21:42] 
[21:42] companies  anymore  how  are  you  picking
[21:45] 
[21:45] because  I  venture  builder  like  how  are
[21:48] 
[21:48] you  picking  your  projects  how  are  you
[21:49] 
[21:49] getting  in  touch  with  entrepreneurs
[21:51] 
[21:52] so  we  don't  get  in  touch  with  inter  we
[21:56] 
[21:56] used  to  do  it  in  the  past  and  we  devoted
[21:58] 
[21:58] a  lot  of  resources  to  listen  to  projects
[22:01] 
[22:01] and  to  meeting  enterpreneurs  and  that's
[22:05] 
[22:05] a  full-time  job  and  it  gets  it  requires
[22:08] 
[22:08] a  lot  of  reserve  time  and  it's  one  of
[22:10] 
[22:10] the  most  important  parts  of  any
[22:11] 
[22:11] accelerator  because  it's  were  you  get  in
[22:14] 
[22:14] contact  with  your  deal  flow  and  where
[22:17] 
[22:17] you  can  select  well  and  an  accelerator
[22:20] 
[22:20] it's  all  about  tilt  flow  and  selecting
[22:22] 
[22:22] so
[22:24] 
[22:24] it's  a  very  important  part  so  we  don't
[22:27] 
[22:27] we're  no  longer  an  accelerator  so  we
[22:29] 
[22:29] don't  don't  devote  resources  to  to
[22:32] 
[22:32] screen  projects  or  see  enterpreneurs
[22:34] 
[22:34] anymore  so  what  we  do  is  we  spend  some
[22:38] 
[22:38] time  investigating  markets  and  we  do  we
[22:42] 
[22:42] plan  with  the  business  plans  with  your
[22:43] 
[22:43] experiments  on  exit  which  is  very  easy
[22:45] 
[22:45] and  and  then  we  study  we're  continuously
[22:50] 
[22:50] connected  and  studying  the  opportunities
[22:52] 
[22:52] around  the  world  without  raising  money
[22:54] 
[22:54] that  are  trendy  for  some  reason  and  we
[22:58] 
[22:58] try  to  extrapolate  it  in  other  markets
[23:00] 
[23:00] so  that's  where  we  are  spending  our
[23:03] 
[23:03] resources  right  now  we  are  analyzing
[23:05] 
[23:05] market  and  of  course  from  evening  and
[23:08] 
[23:08] what  we're  trying  to  do  is  we're  trying
[23:11] 
[23:11] to  attract  talent  but  not  talent  of
[23:13] 
[23:13] interpreters  a  ton  of  people  who  can  do
[23:17] 
[23:17] things  so  we  love  techie  people  we  love
[23:20] 
[23:20] developers  we  love  marketers  we  think
[23:24] 
[23:24] that's  a  hard  thing  the  hard  thing  is  to
[23:26] 
[23:26] be  able  to  do  things  by  yourself  and
[23:29] 
[23:29] then  anyone  can  become  an  entrepreneur
[23:31] 
[23:31] one  day  so  the  idea  is  not  a  hard  thing
[23:34] 
[23:34] but  finding  people  that  can  actually  do
[23:36] 
[23:36] it  exactly  so  so  so  we're  not  focusing
[23:38] 
[23:38] anymore  on  the  idea  at  all  so  we  don't
[23:41] 
[23:41] want  ideas  we  don't  want  projects  we
[23:43] 
[23:43] don't  want  Beach  no  and  we  want  people
[23:47] 
[23:47] that  it's  interesting  that  they  can  do
[23:48] 
[23:48] things  and  we  are  analyzing  the  markets
[23:52] 
[23:52] because  there  are  so  many  opportunities
[23:53] 
[23:53] out  there  so  at  some  point  we  try  to  mix
[23:56] 
[23:56] them  together  and
[23:59] 
[23:59] Anthony's  is  very  important  not  only  for
[24:02] 
[24:02] accellerate  or  benji  builder  and  any
[24:04] 
[24:04] kind  of  player  that  we  want  to  help  to
[24:08] 
[24:08] set  up
[24:10] 
[24:10] business  from  intrapreneurs  with
[24:12] 
[24:12] startups  to  have  a  pretty  good
[24:14] 
[24:14] understanding  of  the  market  I  mean  is  we
[24:16] 
[24:16] are  in  a  very  dynamic  market  things  are
[24:18] 
[24:18] changing  so  fast
[24:20] 
[24:20] so  have  good  understanding  and  devote  a
[24:23] 
[24:23] lot  of  resources  a  lot  of  time  in  trying
[24:25] 
[24:25] to  understand  what's  next  why  this  is
[24:29] 
[24:29] next  is  really  relevant  and  at  the  end
[24:32] 
[24:32] of  the  day  we  also  need  excellent  people
[24:35] 
[24:35] in  order  to  execute  these  kind  of  things
[24:36] 
[24:36] but  it's  very  important  to  understand
[24:38] 
[24:38] the  space  or  the  domain  that  you  want  to
[24:41] 
[24:41] play  exactly  then  when  you  deploy
[24:43] 
[24:43] started  from  from  sort  of  bootcamp  after
[24:46] 
[24:46] like  a  finished  program
[24:49] 
[24:49] do  you  look  at  it  you  know  three  months
[24:51] 
[24:51] happy  or  a  year  after  and  say  this  was  a
[24:53] 
[24:53] success  this  was  a  success  acceleration
[24:56] 
[24:56] or  do  you  have  to  wait  until  you  see  an
[24:58] 
[24:58] exit  or  an  extras  acquisition  or  well  a
[25:01] 
[25:01] deep  at  the  end  is  ready  with  the
[25:03] 
[25:03] startups  depends  how  you  measure  success
[25:05] 
[25:05] right  that  could  be  most  of  the  people
[25:08] 
[25:08] used  to  say  how  much  money  does  it  start
[25:10] 
[25:10] to  raise  and  we  have  pretty  good  numbers
[25:11] 
[25:11] you  can  go  to  our  website  or
[25:13] 
[25:13] how  many  customers  or  how  successful  the
[25:16] 
[25:16] company  from  the  sales  point  of  view
[25:19] 
[25:19] for  me  that  is  another
[25:21] 
[25:21] great  or  another  number  that  is  very
[25:24] 
[25:24] good  is  how  many  of  the  starters  that
[25:27] 
[25:27] have  gone  through  our  programs  after  X
[25:30] 
[25:30] many  years  are  still  alive
[25:33] 
[25:33] and  we  have  a  number  that  are  in  our
[25:36] 
[25:36] website  that  eighteen  right  now  is  82
[25:38] 
[25:38] percent  of  the  350  or  whatever  startups
[25:42] 
[25:42] that  have  gone  through  our  programs  our
[25:44] 
[25:44] life  it's  an  average  but  after  seven
[25:47] 
[25:47] eight  years  there  is  a  big  number  of
[25:49] 
[25:49] starters  that  are  alive  and  and  I  think
[25:52] 
[25:52] that  this  is  a  combination  of  a  lot  of
[25:54] 
[25:54] things  probably  number  one  is  is  the
[25:56] 
[25:56] selection  with  Julia  I  mean  we  spend  a
[25:58] 
[25:58] lot  of  resources  in  trying  to  bring  the
[26:00] 
[26:00] best  guys  mainly  the  best  guys
[26:03] 
[26:03] number  two  is  the  program  I  mean  our
[26:07] 
[26:07] program  has  been  growing  I  mean  we  have
[26:09] 
[26:09] been  learning  when  you  are  doing  this
[26:11] 
[26:11] for  a  lot  of  years  you  understand  the
[26:13] 
[26:13] things  that  we  have  to  do  and  the  things
[26:14] 
[26:14] that  you  don't  have  to  right  but  the
[26:16] 
[26:16] main  goal  for  our  paren  is  to  really
[26:17] 
[26:17] help  these  startups  early  stages  start
[26:20] 
[26:20] after  they  already  have  some  product  or
[26:21] 
[26:21] maybe  some  initial  traction  this  is  what
[26:24] 
[26:24] we  are  looking  for  to  really  find  the
[26:26] 
[26:26] product  feet  on  the  market  feet  what  we
[26:28] 
[26:28] are  trying  to  do  most  of  the  starters
[26:30] 
[26:30] they  fail  because  they  are  not  able  to
[26:32] 
[26:32] find  the  product  via  the  market  fit
[26:34] 
[26:34] right  then  they  then  they  have  a  lot  of
[26:37] 
[26:37] friction  in  order  to  get  sales  or
[26:39] 
[26:39] revenues  or  users  so
[26:42] 
[26:42] friction  no  significant  traction  so  no
[26:45] 
[26:45] investor  trust  you  because  you  don't
[26:47] 
[26:47] have  significant  traction  and  then  good
[26:49] 
[26:49] game  over  okay  so  our  main  goal  during
[26:51] 
[26:51] the  program  that's  why  I  use  a  word
[26:53] 
[26:53] processor  or  a  structure  but  also  our
[26:54] 
[26:54] big  network  of  contacts  is  to  help  these
[26:57] 
[26:57] guys  to  move  your  assumptions  to  a  real
[27:00] 
[27:00] product  feed  market  feed  company  and
[27:04] 
[27:04] because  at  the  end  of  the  day  you
[27:06] 
[27:06] wouldn't  start  up  I  mean  you  have  your
[27:07] 
[27:07] network  you  are  your  co-founders  your
[27:11] 
[27:11] network  of  10  15  people  around  you  and
[27:13] 
[27:13] you  are  trying  to  base  the  in  basing  the
[27:16] 
[27:16] assumptions  or  what  you  believe  what  you
[27:18] 
[27:18] think  and  the  people  around  you  that
[27:20] 
[27:20] unfortunately  is  not  you  know  right
[27:22] 
[27:22] because  you're  trying  to  build  something
[27:23] 
[27:23] that  pretend  to  be  disruptive  or  pretend
[27:26] 
[27:26] to  captured  a  big  portion  of  the  market
[27:28] 
[27:28] well  the  likelihood  that  you  and  your
[27:31] 
[27:31] small  group  is  going  to  be  able  to  do
[27:33] 
[27:33] the  so  is  a  chance  so  we  we  put  then  in
[27:37] 
[27:37] our  process  we  allow  them  to  have
[27:39] 
[27:39] contact  with  a  lot  of  people  with
[27:40] 
[27:40] paraphilias  people  in  order  to  validate
[27:42] 
[27:42] all  these  assumptions  and  do  this  Lean
[27:45] 
[27:45] Startup  and  test  and  to  iterate  and  to
[27:47] 
[27:47] change  a  lot  of  things  in  order  to  by
[27:49] 
[27:49] the  end  of  the  program
[27:51] 
[27:51] hopefully  having  then  much  more  close  to
[27:53] 
[27:53] the  bottom  feeder  market  because  you
[27:55] 
[27:55] have  a  much  better  for  the  feeder  market
[27:57] 
[27:57] feed  well  you  might  be  kind  of  super
[28:00] 
[28:00] great  company  or  not  but  the  chances  on
[28:03] 
[28:03] the  likelihood  to  be  to  stay  in  the
[28:05] 
[28:05] market  it's  gonna  be  much  more  high  yeah
[28:07] 
[28:07] and  Barcelona  as  a  city  we're  all  in
[28:10] 
[28:10] Barcelona  we're  all  operating  from
[28:11] 
[28:11] Barcelona  a  city  that's  growing  very
[28:14] 
[28:14] rapidly  in  terms  of  startups  innovation
[28:16] 
[28:16] and  also  accelerators  incubators  and
[28:19] 
[28:19] venture  builders  but  not  what  do  you
[28:21] 
[28:21] think  is  it  a  good  thing  for  a  city  in
[28:24] 
[28:24] itself  to  have  a  lot  of  these  players
[28:27] 
[28:27] active  when  I  talk  to  people  at  events
[28:30] 
[28:30] and  around  the  city  people  saying  oh  I
[28:33] 
[28:33] didn't  know  it  was  so  many  accelerators
[28:34] 
[28:34] here  like  this  is  a  very  positive  thing
[28:36] 
[28:36] but  for  the  accelerators  itself  probably
[28:39] 
[28:39] you  would  want  to  be  the  only  one  that's
[28:41] 
[28:41] here  right  so  what  what  do  you  think  do
[28:43] 
[28:43] you  think  it's  it's  a  good  thing  or  I  do
[28:46] 
[28:46] think  it's  a  good  thing  for  society  in
[28:49] 
[28:49] general  and  for  for  enterpreneurs  of
[28:51] 
[28:51] course  they  have  bigger  choice  so  I
[28:54] 
[28:54] think  it's  good  that  there  are  2,000
[28:55] 
[28:55] accelerators  and  and  if  there  were
[28:57] 
[28:57] 20,000  it  would  be  better
[28:59] 
[28:59] another  thing  is  that
[29:02] 
[29:02] accelerators  are  sustainable  and
[29:04] 
[29:04] profitable  business  models  that's
[29:05] 
[29:05] another  separate  issue  but  I  think  it's
[29:07] 
[29:07] very  good  that  we  give  resources  to
[29:10] 
[29:10] people  that  is  thinking  on  starting  an
[29:13] 
[29:13] idea  and  they  have  no  clue  whatsoever
[29:15] 
[29:15] where  to  start  from  and  so  any  kind  of
[29:18] 
[29:18] help  you  can  give  to  these  people  at
[29:20] 
[29:20] these  stages  it  it  helps  a  lot
[29:24] 
[29:24] yeah
[29:27] 
[29:27] you  you  are  moving  more  out  over  to  the
[29:30] 
[29:30] boutique  kind  of  doing  an  acceleration
[29:32] 
[29:32] or  as  a  venture  Bueller  as  you  call  it
[29:34] 
[29:34] and  all  the  accelerators  are  basically
[29:37] 
[29:37] they  have  different  type  of  programs  but
[29:40] 
[29:40] they  look  kind  of  similar  from  from  the
[29:42] 
[29:42] outside  do  you  think  more  accelerators
[29:45] 
[29:45] will  you  know  evolve  into  this  venture  a
[29:47] 
[29:47] builder  thing  or  how  do  you  see  in  the
[29:49] 
[29:49] next  five  years
[29:51] 
[29:51] well  it's  funny  because  you  have  here
[29:53] 
[29:53] two  different  two  different  people  that
[29:57] 
[29:57] started  in  sort  of  different  ways  but  I
[30:00] 
[30:00] think  we  are  both  going  to  the  same
[30:02] 
[30:02] model  but  not  on  myself  on  there  Hannah
[30:06] 
[30:06] hell  started  up  with  a  different  model
[30:08] 
[30:08] but  with  a  better  branding  and  better
[30:11] 
[30:11] well-known  company  all  over  Europe  so
[30:14] 
[30:14] and  and  he's  very  niche  oriented  very
[30:16] 
[30:16] vertically  oriented  so  I  think  those  are
[30:19] 
[30:19] the  two  models  are  will  probably  prevail
[30:21] 
[30:21] I  don't  think  there  is  the  traditional
[30:26] 
[30:26] accelerators  that  just  bring  mentors
[30:29] 
[30:29] into  the  companies  I  don't  think  that
[30:31] 
[30:31] could  be  sustainable  over  time  unless
[30:34] 
[30:34] there  are  migrating  towards  helping
[30:37] 
[30:37] companies  develop  their  own
[30:40] 
[30:40] in  in  company
[30:43] 
[30:43] programs  which  is  for  example  what  what
[30:46] 
[30:46] connector  is  doing  I  think  that  would
[30:48] 
[30:48] help  a  lot  with  sustainability  for  for
[30:51] 
[30:51] them  but  I  think  in  the  end  in  my
[30:55] 
[30:55] perspective  is  that  the  best  model  for
[30:58] 
[30:58] some  type  of  people  for  example  in  our
[31:01] 
[31:01] case  or  a  case  of  permit  is  the  company
[31:04] 
[31:04] wheeler  I  mean  we  feel  more  comfortable
[31:07] 
[31:07] with  that  model  we  believe  that  we  can
[31:10] 
[31:10] create  a  lot  of  value  with  that  model
[31:12] 
[31:12] and  well  our  progress  so  far  is
[31:16] 
[31:16] make  me  make  me  think  that  we  are  on
[31:19] 
[31:19] there  on  the  right  track  right  and
[31:22] 
[31:22] there's  always  a  lot  of  developers  and
[31:24] 
[31:24] entrepreneurs  watching  and  listening  to
[31:27] 
[31:27] this  podcast  and  I'm  he'll  do  people
[31:30] 
[31:30] that  are  thinking  should  I  enter  an
[31:32] 
[31:32] accelerator  is  this  the  right  choice  to
[31:34] 
[31:34] me  in  your  opinion  what  kind  of  startup
[31:37] 
[31:37] what  what  do  you  need  to  have  to  apply
[31:41] 
[31:41] for  an  accelerator  what  do  you  think
[31:44] 
[31:44] well  as  we  said  before  I  mean  there  are
[31:46] 
[31:46] different  types  of  a  Cerritos  I  think
[31:48] 
[31:48] the  first  thing  I  will  I  will  tell  the
[31:51] 
[31:51] entrepreneurs  is  to  do  the  homework  I
[31:53] 
[31:53] mean  to  understand  the  stage  that  they
[31:55] 
[31:55] are  right  now  to  understand  any
[31:58] 
[31:58] accelerator  what  they  are  looking  for
[32:00] 
[32:00] their  oscillators  or  incubators  that
[32:02] 
[32:02] they  are  targeting  pre  acceleration
[32:03] 
[32:03] companies  or  pre  idea  or  idea  state  so
[32:07] 
[32:07] there  are  different  states  at  these
[32:09] 
[32:09] early  days  of  the  companies  they  have  to
[32:12] 
[32:12] understand  what  they  are  in  because
[32:14] 
[32:14] different  accelerators  are  targeting  to
[32:16] 
[32:16] different  kind  of  teams  or  the  different
[32:18] 
[32:18] kind  of  companies  so  the  first  thing  is
[32:20] 
[32:20] to  do  your  homework  try  to  understand
[32:23] 
[32:23] which  are  the  cell  raters  incubators  or
[32:26] 
[32:26] venture  builders  that  are  really  fitting
[32:28] 
[32:28] in  what  you  are  right  now  second  thing
[32:31] 
[32:31] is  trying  to  understand  how  these  guys
[32:32] 
[32:32] are  going  to  help  me  I  mean  it's  to
[32:34] 
[32:34] really  the  same  way  that  the  when  you
[32:36] 
[32:36] are  trying  to  raise  money  you  try  to
[32:38] 
[32:38] understand  more  and  more  the  investors
[32:40] 
[32:40] do  the  same  thing  with  the  cell  rate  or
[32:41] 
[32:41] try  to  understand  who  are  the  guys
[32:43] 
[32:43] behind  rado  behind  incubator  behind  the
[32:45] 
[32:45] venture  builder  what's  your  bag  down  how
[32:47] 
[32:47] are  you  planning  to  help  me  be  very  soft
[32:49] 
[32:49] stick  with  that  because  it's  some  kind
[32:51] 
[32:51] of  Mario's  most  of  these  relationship
[32:54] 
[32:54] ends  with  an  equity  a  change  so  it's
[32:55] 
[32:55] going  to  be  your  partner  it's  not  going
[32:57] 
[32:57] to  be  for  the  next  three  months  it's
[32:58] 
[32:58] gonna  be  forever  so  do  your  homework  and
[33:01] 
[33:01] and  to  be  honest  I  mean  the  teams  are
[33:03] 
[33:03] much  more  successful  where  the  teams  are
[33:05] 
[33:05] were  much  more  demanding  at  the
[33:07] 
[33:07] beginning  right  being  very  why  you're
[33:10] 
[33:10] gonna  help  me  what  are  the  things  that
[33:11] 
[33:11] you're  gonna  me  can't  you  this  kind  of
[33:13] 
[33:13] list  of  things  is  something  that  you
[33:15] 
[33:15] believe  that  we  can  achieve  within  the
[33:16] 
[33:16] program  trying  to  understand  what  are
[33:18] 
[33:18] the  outcomes  of  the  program  it's  not  yes
[33:20] 
[33:20] go  to  website  apply  online  I  mean  try  to
[33:23] 
[33:23] have  these  one  on  one  interviews  and  in
[33:26] 
[33:26] my  experience  the  best  things  are  the
[33:28] 
[33:28] ones  are  much  more  demanding  trying  to
[33:30] 
[33:30] understand  what  are  gonna  be  the  outcome
[33:31] 
[33:31] of  the  stellarator
[33:33] 
[33:33] and  is  there  any  like  misconceptions  of
[33:36] 
[33:36] startups  applying  that  they're  thinking
[33:40] 
[33:40] that  you  can  can  give  them  something
[33:41] 
[33:41] that  you  can't  give  them  there  are  a  lot
[33:43] 
[33:43] of  misconceptions  and  I  think  this  is
[33:45] 
[33:45] one  of  the  issues  of  the  of  the
[33:48] 
[33:48] accelerators  I  mean  I  agree  with  Bernard
[33:51] 
[33:51] saying  that  as  much  as  we  can  it's  going
[33:53] 
[33:53] to  be  great  it's  as  far  as  all  of  them
[33:56] 
[33:56] can  deliver  enough  quality  value  because
[33:59] 
[33:59] this  is  at  the  installation  that  is  not
[34:01] 
[34:01] a  clear  definition  right  Nessa  said
[34:03] 
[34:03] before  I  mean  most  entrepreneurs  are
[34:04] 
[34:04] confused  what  doesn't  mean  I  mean  it's
[34:06] 
[34:06] gonna  be  a  table  and  one  mentor  coming
[34:09] 
[34:09] two  days  a  week  or  whatever  is  gonna  be
[34:12] 
[34:12] like  we  do  30  workshops  15  people  really
[34:16] 
[34:16] helping  me  every  day  plus  80  mentor
[34:20] 
[34:20] whatever  so  it's  not  clear  so  I  mean
[34:23] 
[34:23] it's  good  to  have  a  lot  of  a  straight  or
[34:24] 
[34:24] Sieben  in  Barcelona  as  far  as  most  of
[34:27] 
[34:27] think  and  deliver  enough  level  of
[34:29] 
[34:29] quality  because  if  not  intrapreneurs  are
[34:31] 
[34:31] joining  this  straight  to  the  may  be  is
[34:33] 
[34:33] not  delivering  enough  level  of  quality
[34:34] 
[34:34] and  there  is  a  bad  feeling  right  and
[34:38] 
[34:38] this  is  then  affecting  the  others  that
[34:40] 
[34:40] we  are  trying  to  do  in  a  proper  way
[34:42] 
[34:42] right  right
[34:45] 
[34:45] we  are  not  talking  about  model  here  that
[34:48] 
[34:48] is  a  pre  accelerator  which  is  what  start
[34:52] 
[34:52] narrator  is  something  where
[34:55] 
[34:55] entrepreneurs  can  come  and  come  be  there
[34:58] 
[34:58] for  at  least  six  weeks  can  have  an
[35:02] 
[35:02] exposition  to  Mentors  but  we  are  not
[35:04] 
[35:04] requiring  any  equity  from  them  or  any
[35:07] 
[35:07] kind  of  payment  in  any  kind  of  mining
[35:10] 
[35:10] right  so  basically  we  are  just  giving  to
[35:12] 
[35:12] that  yeah  so  that's  how  good  thing  for
[35:15] 
[35:15] them  I  mean  for  entrepreneurs  in  order
[35:17] 
[35:17] to  for  the  less  experienced  people  to
[35:21] 
[35:21] take  and  to  have  a  first  feeling  of  what
[35:24] 
[35:24] it  is  to  win  in  an  accelerator  so  I
[35:28] 
[35:28] think  this  kind  of  program  is  also  a
[35:30] 
[35:30] good  thing  for  people  with  without
[35:33] 
[35:33] experience  but  if  you  have
[35:36] 
[35:36] some  more  experience  and  you've  been
[35:39] 
[35:39] already  into  a  pre  accelerator  or  some
[35:42] 
[35:42] other  experience  which  could  help  then
[35:45] 
[35:45] it's  a  matter  of  finding  out  exactly
[35:47] 
[35:47] what  is  that  you  are  going  to  be  given
[35:50] 
[35:50] from  that  program  in  particular  and  see
[35:53] 
[35:53] if  it  really  matches  what  you  really
[35:55] 
[35:55] need  and  you  have  some  success  stories
[35:58] 
[35:58] as  well  like  also  like  it  it  Megan  and
[36:01] 
[36:01] startup  bootcamp
[36:03] 
[36:03] what  are  like  the  factors  within  these
[36:06] 
[36:06] companies  that  that  you  call  them
[36:08] 
[36:08] success  stories
[36:09] 
[36:09] well  it  depends  also
[36:12] 
[36:12] it  begins  by  the  entrepreneur  by  the
[36:15] 
[36:15] entrepreneurial  team  I  think  it's  one  of
[36:17] 
[36:17] the  most  important  elements  the  other
[36:19] 
[36:19] element  is  the  the  sector  in  which  they
[36:22] 
[36:22] are  in  and  the  time  in  which  they  got
[36:24] 
[36:24] into  that  into  that  sector  we  have  a
[36:27] 
[36:27] very  good  experience  in  e-commerce  there
[36:29] 
[36:29] was  a  company  that  was  astir  have  five
[36:32] 
[36:32] years  ago  and  we  have  a  also  very  bad
[36:36] 
[36:36] story  on  another  ecommerce  company  that
[36:39] 
[36:39] started  like
[36:41] 
[36:41] two  years  or  three  years  ago  so  the
[36:44] 
[36:44] thing  is  three  years  ago  for  a  fashion
[36:47] 
[36:47] equivalence  for  example  was  too  late  and
[36:49] 
[36:49] there  was  a  that  thing  was  very  rude  but
[36:52] 
[36:52] the  opportunity  we  probably  wasn't  there
[36:54] 
[36:54] anymore  because  solando  was  already
[36:56] 
[36:56] there  with  a  huge  investment  and  asus
[37:00] 
[37:00] was  already  the  UK  so  it  wasn't  anymore
[37:03] 
[37:03] an  opportunity  despite  the  team  was  I
[37:06] 
[37:06] would  team  deliver  you  know  what  they
[37:08] 
[37:08] had  to  deliver  so  I  guess  if  you  take  a
[37:12] 
[37:12] look  at  those  two  issues  you  probably
[37:14] 
[37:14] have  fifty  percent  of  the  issues  you
[37:17] 
[37:17] need  to  take  a  look  already  there  then
[37:20] 
[37:20] there  are  other  other  issues  like  for
[37:23] 
[37:23] example  the
[37:24] 
[37:24] capability  of  the  team  to  get  investment
[37:26] 
[37:26] which  is  obviously  something  very  very
[37:29] 
[37:29] important  as  well  but  I  would  say  those
[37:32] 
[37:32] three  issues  are  probably  the  most
[37:34] 
[37:34] important  ones  in  my  case
[37:36] 
[37:36] it  is  clear  everybody  is  saying  in  all
[37:39] 
[37:39] levels  of  the  chain  right  intrapreneur
[37:42] 
[37:42] is  the  most  important  thing  right  but  I
[37:44] 
[37:44] think  it's  much  more  important  in  this
[37:46] 
[37:46] kind  of
[37:47] 
[37:47] vehicles  we're  talking  about  when  you
[37:50] 
[37:50] build  the  roster  orators  to  have  someone
[37:54] 
[37:54] open-minded  I  mean  flexible  and  with  the
[37:58] 
[37:58] ability  to  listen  the  ability  to  because
[38:01] 
[38:01] his  cell  rate  or  some  bunch  of  business
[38:04] 
[38:04] all  about  that  I  mean  this  is  that  is
[38:05] 
[38:05] now  initial  business  plan  that  is  going
[38:08] 
[38:08] to  be  made  so  the  things  are  gonna
[38:10] 
[38:10] change  so  and  things  are  going  to  change
[38:12] 
[38:12] much  better  if  you  are  listening  and  you
[38:14] 
[38:14] are  learning  from  what  you  are  getting
[38:15] 
[38:15] so
[38:17] 
[38:17] you  ask  him  be  forming  with  it  what  you
[38:19] 
[38:19] have  to  look  at  the  decelerator  or  a
[38:21] 
[38:21] venture  builder  when  you  are  looking  for
[38:23] 
[38:23] I  also  mean  they  also  have  to  take  a
[38:25] 
[38:25] look  inside  and  so  if  they  are  ready  to
[38:29] 
[38:29] really  go  through  this  kind  of  process
[38:31] 
[38:31] because  I  mean  is  there  are  people  I  you
[38:33] 
[38:33] know  listening  I  mean  these  people  are
[38:35] 
[38:35] saying  I'm  listening  you  but  they  are
[38:36] 
[38:36] not  listening  me  right  and  it's  not  that
[38:39] 
[38:39] we  have  to  take  your  decision  but  you
[38:40] 
[38:40] have  to  be  open-minded
[38:42] 
[38:42] open  to  change  flexible  those  are  very
[38:47] 
[38:47] important  skills  that  you  should  have  if
[38:50] 
[38:50] you  want  to  be  part  of  one  of  one  of
[38:52] 
[38:52] these  companies  of  process  right  and  how
[38:56] 
[38:56] is  it  for  you  to  because  but  not  said
[38:58] 
[38:59] that  we  are  interested  in  getting  talent
[39:00] 
[39:00] like  developers  marketers  the  best  ones
[39:02] 
[39:02] but  but  you  usually  start  with  my  idea
[39:04] 
[39:04] right  you  usually  start  with  the
[39:06] 
[39:06] entrepreneur  when  you  take  people  in  how
[39:08] 
[39:08] do  you
[39:09] 
[39:09] I  make  sure  that  they  have  the  right
[39:12] 
[39:12] kind  of  talent  already  inside  the  team
[39:14] 
[39:14] all  it's  a  combination  of  a  lot  of
[39:17] 
[39:17] things  and  something  that  you  developed
[39:18] 
[39:18] from  time  to  time  to  really  understand
[39:22] 
[39:22] yes  for  you  to  put  an  example  during  our
[39:24] 
[39:24] selection  process  I  mean  as  I  said
[39:27] 
[39:27] before  I  mean  we  start  with  a  big  thing
[39:28] 
[39:28] a  big  database  and  we  nail  down  and  at
[39:31] 
[39:31] the  end  we  finish  with  inviting  20  teams
[39:34] 
[39:34] to  parcel  enough  to  stay  for  the  week
[39:36] 
[39:36] with  us  from  this  year  we  have  20  teams
[39:39] 
[39:39] fronting  was  12  different  countries
[39:41] 
[39:41] Australia  Hindi  and  so  on  so  with  these
[39:44] 
[39:44] two  days  we  do  a  lot  of  things  for
[39:46] 
[39:46] instance  one  of  the  things  that  we  do  is
[39:47] 
[39:47] to  have  some  psychologist
[39:49] 
[39:49] interview  in  these  these  people  I  mean
[39:52] 
[39:52] is  what  something  that  we  learn  from
[39:54] 
[39:54] this  period  is  trying  to  understand  if
[39:56] 
[39:56] because  someone  could  be  a  good
[39:58] 
[39:58] entrepreneur  but  at  the  end  we  need  a
[39:59] 
[39:59] team  is  that  in  gonna  be  able  to  work
[40:01] 
[40:01] together  well  it's  another  layer  of
[40:03] 
[40:03] information  in  order  to  validate  this
[40:05] 
[40:05] make  sense  or  not
[40:07] 
[40:07] right  and  but  not
[40:10] 
[40:10] for  many  when  I  speak  people  venture
[40:13] 
[40:13] builder  is  something  a  bit  cryptic  it's
[40:15] 
[40:15] a  bit  new  and  a  venture  builder  it's  not
[40:18] 
[40:18] given  that  everybody  knows  what  that  is
[40:20] 
[40:20] right  away  but  we  just  started  a  new
[40:23] 
[40:23] company  at  evening  is  called  factorial
[40:26] 
[40:26] can  you  tell  us  a  bit  the  process  I
[40:29] 
[40:29] guess  this  is  a  process  that  you  haven't
[40:31] 
[40:31] done  yet  but  like  how  do  you  plan  to
[40:34] 
[40:34] help  this  company  within  it  Nick  how  do
[40:35] 
[40:35] you  plan  to  support  a  new  company
[40:38] 
[40:38] because  it's  a  bit  special  we  start
[40:40] 
[40:40] something  right  now  so  you  say  Ben  to
[40:43] 
[40:43] build  it  is  cryptic  it's  because  we  give
[40:45] 
[40:45] fancy  names  to  things  yeah  it  used  to  be
[40:48] 
[40:48] a  group  of  companies  right  it's  a  growth
[40:50] 
[40:50] companies  and
[40:52] 
[40:53] so  how  do  how  does  it  work  it  doesn't
[40:56] 
[40:56] have  a  fixed  way  to  work  and  that's  why
[40:58] 
[40:58] we  don't  have  a  program  or  you  know  and
[41:00] 
[41:00] so  we  try  to  look  for  talent
[41:02] 
[41:02] continuously  to  work  in  our  startups  and
[41:05] 
[41:05] we  do  events  with  the  workshops  with  our
[41:08] 
[41:08] kind  of  stuff  like  other  accelerators
[41:10] 
[41:10] would  do  and  but  our  goal  is  to  find
[41:13] 
[41:13] talent  to  work  in  our  startups  and  then
[41:16] 
[41:16] since  we  start  the  relationship  with
[41:19] 
[41:19] these  people
[41:20] 
[41:20] a  professional  relationship  in  in  in  all
[41:23] 
[41:23] of  our  startups  we  start  understanding
[41:26] 
[41:26] how  do  they  perform  and  how  do  they  work
[41:29] 
[41:29] in  marketing  in  development  whatever  and
[41:33] 
[41:33] then  when  once  we  know  these  people  we
[41:35] 
[41:35] know  how  to  perform  we  know  how  do  they
[41:38] 
[41:38] work  in  their  teams  then  we  are  in  a
[41:40] 
[41:40] better  position  and  to  think  of
[41:43] 
[41:43] investing  on  those  people  so  that's  your
[41:45] 
[41:45] final  or  final  stats  through
[41:48] 
[41:48] professional  relationship  we  work
[41:51] 
[41:51] together  and  then  we  consider  why  don't
[41:54] 
[41:54] we  start  a  company  together  so  it's  the
[41:57] 
[41:57] opposite  way  right  so  we  try  to  look  for
[41:59] 
[41:59] performance  people  who
[42:01] 
[42:01] do  worse  you  know  and  then  we  at  the
[42:06] 
[42:06] same  time  we  analyze  markets  and  we  come
[42:08] 
[42:08] up  with  ideas  and  we  have  limited
[42:10] 
[42:10] resources  we  cannot  be  starting
[42:12] 
[42:12] everything  in  the  world  like  maybe
[42:14] 
[42:14] drugget  internet  -  no  hmm  so  we  try  to
[42:18] 
[42:18] the  boat  or  small  resources  to  the
[42:21] 
[42:21] biggest  opportunities  we  find  and  that's
[42:24] 
[42:24] how  it  works  we  also  get  in  contact  with
[42:27] 
[42:27] our  with  a  network  of  investors  that
[42:29] 
[42:29] that  are  very  related  to  -  to  what  we  do
[42:33] 
[42:33] and  they  invested  a  cleaner  companies  so
[42:36] 
[42:36] we  never  we  never  wanted  to  raise  money
[42:40] 
[42:40] in  it  Nick  so  we  would  have  a  problem  a
[42:44] 
[42:44] conflict  of  interest  because  then  we
[42:45] 
[42:45] would  have  to  accept  projects  and  look
[42:48] 
[42:48] for  projects  and  and  we  would  have  to
[42:51] 
[42:51] enter  projects  in  a  certain  amount  of
[42:53] 
[42:53] time  so  we  try  our  investors  -  we  tell
[42:58] 
[42:58] our  investors  to  invest  directly  in  our
[42:59] 
[42:59] companies  and  we  are  focused  solely
[43:02] 
[43:02] completely  on  growing  our  companies  and
[43:06] 
[43:06] and  growing  or  companies  as  a  business
[43:08] 
[43:08] because  that's  you  talked  before  about
[43:10] 
[43:10] misconceptions  I  think  one  of  the
[43:12] 
[43:12] biggest  misconceptions  is  that  getting
[43:14] 
[43:14] funded  is  growing  your  business  and  this
[43:17] 
[43:17] happens  a  lot  with  mental  builder  and  an
[43:20] 
[43:20] accelerator  so  we  have  a  sort  of  a
[43:22] 
[43:22] conflict  of  interest  here  because  and  we
[43:25] 
[43:25] think  that  our  business  model  ultimately
[43:29] 
[43:29] is  is  exiting  companies  and  having  two
[43:32] 
[43:32] turns  and  equity  so  and  we  push
[43:36] 
[43:36] sometimes  companies  to  get  funded  two
[43:39] 
[43:39] three  value  and  to  get  revalued  and
[43:43] 
[43:43] raise  the  value  of  the  company  and  then
[43:46] 
[43:46] or  returns  an  equity  are  bigger  but  for
[43:49] 
[43:49] business  to  make  sense  I
[43:51] 
[43:51] the  purpose  is  to  grow  as  a  business  so
[43:55] 
[43:55] to  make  the  business  sustainable  but
[43:58] 
[43:58] also  scalable  and  and  that  should  be  the
[44:00] 
[44:00] ultimate  goal  not  finding  and  over
[44:03] 
[44:03] funding  and  over  funding  which  is  what
[44:06] 
[44:06] is  happening  and  sometimes  and  it
[44:08] 
[44:08] creates  sort  of  small  bubbles  in
[44:09] 
[44:09] different  sectors  so  I  think  that  the
[44:12] 
[44:12] purpose  of  a  business  is  to  grow  with  as
[44:14] 
[44:14] little  resources  as  possible  and  with  as
[44:16] 
[44:16] little  dilution  as  possible
[44:19] 
[44:19] great  that  was  everything  we  had  time
[44:22] 
[44:22] for  unfortunately
[44:24] 
[44:24] forty-five  minutes  go  by  fast  but  let's
[44:27] 
[44:27] stay  tuned  for  our  next  podcast  in  in
[44:29] 
[44:29] December  remember  that  you  can  catch  the
[44:32] 
[44:32] highlights  from  from  this  podcast  in
[44:33] 
[44:33] video  form  on  on  ethnic  blog  and  or  on
[44:35] 
[44:35] our  Facebook  and  everywhere  we  are
[44:37] 
[44:37] online  thank  you  again  uh  elevation  but
[44:41] 
[44:41] not  for  coming  I  really  appreciate
[44:42] 
[44:42] taking  your  time  you  are  all  very  busy
[44:44] 
[44:44] so  I  really  appreciate  it  and  my  name  is
[44:47] 
[44:47] Sandra  oblong  and  I  remember  to  follow
[44:49] 
[44:49] ethnic  for  for  more  quality  tech
[44:51] 
[44:51] discussions  also  in  the  future
[44:53] 
[44:53] [Music]

Transcripción completa

[Music] welcome to the ethnic podcast and my name is Sandra Holland today we will discuss the differences between startup accelerators incubators and venture builders if they work for startups and if so what's the success factors and we're super lucky to have with us some great people we had angle Garcia director of startup bootcamp IOT data and cybersecurity was a Patricio Hunt managing partner of intellectual and also the ethnic president Pernod Ferraro welcome to you all thank you be here so to start off with young he'll you've been involved with startup bootcamp for a while now couple years you also invested in a couple of the projects yourself what is it that you find so interesting with with this type of program compared to just regular seed funding well I finished our different things I mean city funded our cellar a toes and incubators there are a lot of animals probably we're going to discuss it in the during the podcasts are completely different things Anthony's a serratus are to some extent trying to prepare these teams sometimes even don't even companies these teams to be some kind of investable company or an investable startup right so we are early I think in the in the process of the funding so I don't think that we have to compare such investment with celery toes or a complete different animals the things that we are looking for our different I'm probably something that we're going to discuss today right right what are you finding appealing with with these kind of programs what what are the big pros for you well as a personal level accelerator is something that you are really much more deep into the people I mean it's a lot about the personal relationship I mean really helping in a day to day basis to these guys son invested I mean you take some distance right them is much more a financial investment it's also a financial investment foreign selector but these are other much more personal factors I mean you mean you're gonna really try to help these guys to make the dream a reality right this is you are going to the personal level so it's something much more much more personal that when you are I get an investor then you start to have your legal implications and your financial rules and this kind of thing so you're moving to a different level I think that both elements are necessary in an ecosystem but are doing different things and act in a different stage and petitio you have a different approach more than like a traditional accelerator with a six month program right tell us a little bit about your approach to startups and how startups approach you well we have different models actually because we running the tech stars startup next program which is a traditional program or you have a selection process in the beginning applicants that are interested in in getting in etc and that's a batch process and we do it twice a year and then we have our let's say our own boutique accelerator which is Internet tube and there we do whatever we think is best for our company and depends a lot in the context of the company the team the stage of the company our interest in the company as well so we do a very different thing there we usually do one or two companies every year only that we really do a let's say we do a custom fit program and we just concentrate on what the team really needs and it's a very different approach so why did you choose this approach instead of as you are affiliated with the tech stars the more traditional program what did you choose to do this kind of thing basically we are doing things us as we see there require in the rhythm is not something that we have a device in a very specific way we are always sort of innovating on the periphery of the of things and we are looking finding exactly what are the best opportunities that we have there and we go behind those opportunities at the same time for example last year we founded a mobile venture builder because we thought there was a perhaps a more interesting model for us and it was probably a model that was better for our skills so now we are very focused on that program as well and we are doing things as they are coming to us and taking opportunities mostly rather than how very let's say focus strategy based on exactly things that we think are that we have to do I mean we're more open to innovation rather than designing what we want to exactly and talking about venture builders but not you used to be ethnic used to be a very traditional accelerator used to call it the hacker accelerator once but but it changed a bit the last time can you tell us about what has to change and when you speak to people now what do you call it Nick hmm so we never meant to be a traditional accelerator so that's why we call it the hacker accelerator but basically what we did what we did in our short span of life is experimenting so we tried different models and we experimented and we reached to the conclusion that a fixed program with a set of mentors with a certain amount of resources devoted to each project and with the need of having to do n number of projects every n number of time was not possible for us we studied the mother we analyzed it and we realized that it was not possible at least for us and so we decided to move away from this model and and start companies and commit about committing the companies that we were growing so increasing our participation and our effort in smaller companies instead of doing a model based on quantity time statistics so we we tried to focus on smaller projects on a small number of projects and then commit on these projects forever not just for a period of time but making sure that if we are something and we take something out of this project it will be along with the other enterpreneurs that are that are doing it so we we take big bigger stakes in the companies that we work and we take full responsibility we don't look for winners we make them and we make winner teams and winner projects we are continuously striving to find the greatest talent and we take responsibility of funding the projects of of the success of the project in the long term hmm so that's a difference in the mother we then we don't participate in a bad way in a very early stage in a short amount or close amount of time and we take responsibility almost forever in the projects right then okay you have been sorry to campus is one of the more successful accelerators in Europe one would say and but but the business model business model itself as Bernard says they went away from it that was their own choice but but how are you looking at the business model do you find it successful itself or is it too early to say what do you think it's a very good question because the thing that the other day I was speaking well I don't remember what it was but he was talking about the salah laid off right and i did some kind of research about and i find out that what it was at angel is that there are two thousand accelerators in the world which is not true it's not true which is true is the there are 2,000 companies or entities that are claiming to be an accelerator because at the end of the day I mean you take a look to all these two thousand websites and all of the necessary half workshops I have mentors and I'm gonna move you to the next level and blah blah blah blah blah but at the end the reality is that most of them they are starting today and in two years from now and and windier for now they have to rethink about the model because the model is not sustainable yes by definition means you are trying to have some tables and chairs and if you are not don't have enough money in order to deliver enough value so you're trying to make money with the equity that you are taking in these companies but at the same time you have enough resources in order to deliver enough value to these companies well it's trying to do a circle with that square it's gonna be a challenge I think that there are some players out there I'm not saying that we are better or not but we have a different model I mean we have these corporations support in our province and I'm talking not only about to start a boot camp but also techstars of black and play or the guys from Y Combinator of all 500 starters in the US that we have these corporations investing or supporting our programs in order to have access to innovation and that's what makes our business model sustainable I mean there are few solar leaders in the world that they have been in the market for more than six seven years around the ones that are describing and of course that we are changing things internally but we have find out is way a sustainable business model that if you look around is it's not in others always have to rethink about different ways to do it different ways to find sources of finding in order to be able to get money back from this equity stake that's the set before I mean we don't have enough resources to invest in these companies the likelihood to get a lot of money from this equity stake is right so very poor right so we have been doing other things sorcery changing things focusing more and more in the vertical thing right that probably we are going to speak later I mean is one of the futures of accelerators trying to be much more specific in something but again everything that we have this specific business model that allows our to provide or deliver at least more resources and we believe that more value that little players in the market positio you have also been involved with this traditional type of programs but as we talked about like the accelerate accelerate that's all only been around for a couple of years it's a fairly new new thing so when when can we say that accelerator is the success at what time is it too early or is it in the future what do you think I think that like who was saying there are many type of accelerators and you can call accelerators really just a few of them so basically I think those that are focused on verticals will probably be more successful in the long term also the first accelerators the world ones that are more consolidated like Y Combinator tech stars start at bootcamp and a few others probably because they were the first to market and because they have this effect of being able to select the best companies all over the world those are probably going to stand out and going to continue in a success for the rest what you have to do to see if you can find a specific model that may deliver some special value to the companies that you are looking for specifically but should be like a very very let's say focused group of companies and I guess those ones are the ones that are going to prevail right right for us the model let's say in our case we've been going from the hybrid custom-fit sort of program that we deliver we only do that as I said before just for a couple of companies perhaps each year and then we also Bernard was saying we found out these along many years and looking for well whatever the best thing for us to do and finally we came to the conclusion that a company will there was in our case the best thing to to concentrate our deliberate efforts on the other hand as I was saying also you have to remain sort of open to innovate on the periphery so if they come to us a couple of teams every year that we see that they're really good and we can help them we do that I mean we help them in the way that they need and in the way that is better for them to eat we have but our deliberate efforts now are just focus on the company wielder which we see that is the best model for us in order to build companies it's a kind of model perhaps it's more closer to whatever nut is doing we we select further we'll go all the other way I mean we select the space in which we want to innovate we look for a company that would validate our concept then we select the technology we build the technology we get traction in the market and if we get real traction then we'll go and try to find that team that would be able to take this to a success or to a spin-off that could be successful in the long term so this is a completely different model we believe in in our case in particular that this is the best for us to we believe that's the model where we can be more successful and this is why we do that yeah I have a question related to that yes no please please go ahead and I think it's interesting to analyze what we define as sustainable and how sustainable is a goal by itself so is it is it not profitable the goal of any business so shouldn't we create profitable business but still and I would like to understand how an accelerator can be sustainable and and how an accelerator can be profitable on what's a ball and what's the time span needed for that so I think that those are the biggest questions I'd realizes in the world even the first accelerators in 2005 Paula Hammond started Dominator think tech stuff was one year later no something like that 2006 and these are the old examples the oldest from them many accelerators appeared as you said and but I think none of them are still or have enough track record today to say that they are profitable business models even Y Combinator so to say they are profitable you have to set and expect an expectation at some point and you have to fit this expectation but Y Combinator grow so big that they get increasing their expectation so now they even expect to be way more weak and they are getting the best deal flow in the world so when it's an accelerator well when can we call an accelerator a sustainable business model or a profitable business model is it mean does it mean that you have a source for investment that keeps coming or or whatever you mean to your uncle for example or a sustainable model is something that you can keep in the time right something that you can keep doing for a lot of time sure and I think all these models are clearly sustainable because they have been in the market for a lot of period of time don't thing about that the model is only to make money with the equity in the companies they are also making money with the corporations and but I think the the the best way to look at that I mean these guys have been in the market for a long time all the guys are not longer in the market so there are guys that are sustainable the guys are not sustainable and we're talking about all these guys in the market it's a big group nearly 2,000 accelerators yeah you're trying to get the best talent to startup bootcamp every year or every a for every program doesn't it make it harder for you guys to attract the best companies when you're competing with suddenly thousands of other people around around the world what does it is make it's it's becoming a very crowded space it's true I mean only in our last call this year we analyzed something like a hundred 50 startups in the IOT and data space only domain I mean it's a significant number of startups of course out of the 850 we easily find that half of these probably is not are not fitting in what we are looking for but I think that this year we spoke and we change information with around 350 400 startups from a lot of countries all around the wall then we nail down the database and we try to so the point is that the space is so crowded as I said before and sometimes for entrepreneurs so difficult to understand which is the right choice for me right I mean in some times they are much more focused in trying to understand how much money these guys are going to offer to me any change of how much equity right not paying attention in order to understand what they can get from the program right the reality is that becoming more and more difficult to attractive especially there are locations are very crowd like London or Berlin to move teams and waved on these kind of locations it's very difficult but at the end eme were provided the point is that you have to devote much more efforts I mean you have to put many more resources this year we have like 780 sculptors working for four months trying to find the best things because you have to get in contact with these teams there are in Poland or in Russia and you have to explain then the value that you can provide to them because it's for them as I said before it's very difficult you take a look to the website of Loretta Sullivan looks at same thing so but this is a very economical deal for us right I mean it's well but it's not about this I mean it's about all the things I mean where are the resources that you are gonna get which about the program what you're gonna do during the 90 days who are the guys that are involved in the simulator with your background so all the things to share with these themes but it's an effort that you have to do in order to be able to share with these guys and help them to take a decision and this this again does something with the business model as well you know when you can't find enough great companies to enter your accelerator and the oil companies are just divided all over Europe how will this evolve you know in the next years if two gets it gets harder and harder and harder to attract good companies how will what do you think Patrizio well if you look at what we do really we are reactive in terms of intellect amid self we are reactive if we find a team that we feel it's the right team and they have the right product then we invest resources but as Bernardo say we don't have a specific number of startup that we are looking forward to accelerate or incubate each year so we are open to find an opportunity and then invest on that opportunity on the other hand since that is a reactive strategy then we decided to come up with a venture wielder because that's a deliberate strategy for us so there we don't wait for capturing talent or acquire in Thailand we just go behind a company or create in a company that we will live in because we see that the trend is correct the technology is the right time to invest technology etcetera etcetera so in that regard we are not waiting for we're not scouting to find the right talent with the right idea which is a more difficult thing to find I mean we are first developing idea then we are finding the talent but if you want to find both all together that's what it's becoming more and more difficult so what we do is we bring together both and we are very good and we can be very good we live and we are doing some some progress in that we are creating the opportunity finding the talent it's a different thing we think we can do it as well but if we do this in a separated way we think we can be more successful and it's going to be for us easier to deliver a sustainable business model in time right you're not scouting scouting at all for companies anymore how are you picking because I venture builder like how are you picking your projects how are you getting in touch with entrepreneurs so we don't get in touch with inter we used to do it in the past and we devoted a lot of resources to listen to projects and to meeting enterpreneurs and that's a full-time job and it gets it requires a lot of reserve time and it's one of the most important parts of any accelerator because it's were you get in contact with your deal flow and where you can select well and an accelerator it's all about tilt flow and selecting so it's a very important part so we don't we're no longer an accelerator so we don't don't devote resources to to screen projects or see enterpreneurs anymore so what we do is we spend some time investigating markets and we do we plan with the business plans with your experiments on exit which is very easy and and then we study we're continuously connected and studying the opportunities around the world without raising money that are trendy for some reason and we try to extrapolate it in other markets so that's where we are spending our resources right now we are analyzing market and of course from evening and what we're trying to do is we're trying to attract talent but not talent of interpreters a ton of people who can do things so we love techie people we love developers we love marketers we think that's a hard thing the hard thing is to be able to do things by yourself and then anyone can become an entrepreneur one day so the idea is not a hard thing but finding people that can actually do it exactly so so so we're not focusing anymore on the idea at all so we don't want ideas we don't want projects we don't want Beach no and we want people that it's interesting that they can do things and we are analyzing the markets because there are so many opportunities out there so at some point we try to mix them together and Anthony's is very important not only for accellerate or benji builder and any kind of player that we want to help to set up business from intrapreneurs with startups to have a pretty good understanding of the market I mean is we are in a very dynamic market things are changing so fast so have good understanding and devote a lot of resources a lot of time in trying to understand what's next why this is next is really relevant and at the end of the day we also need excellent people in order to execute these kind of things but it's very important to understand the space or the domain that you want to play exactly then when you deploy started from from sort of bootcamp after like a finished program do you look at it you know three months happy or a year after and say this was a success this was a success acceleration or do you have to wait until you see an exit or an extras acquisition or well a deep at the end is ready with the startups depends how you measure success right that could be most of the people used to say how much money does it start to raise and we have pretty good numbers you can go to our website or how many customers or how successful the company from the sales point of view for me that is another great or another number that is very good is how many of the starters that have gone through our programs after X many years are still alive and we have a number that are in our website that eighteen right now is 82 percent of the 350 or whatever startups that have gone through our programs our life it's an average but after seven eight years there is a big number of starters that are alive and and I think that this is a combination of a lot of things probably number one is is the selection with Julia I mean we spend a lot of resources in trying to bring the best guys mainly the best guys number two is the program I mean our program has been growing I mean we have been learning when you are doing this for a lot of years you understand the things that we have to do and the things that you don't have to right but the main goal for our paren is to really help these startups early stages start after they already have some product or maybe some initial traction this is what we are looking for to really find the product feet on the market feet what we are trying to do most of the starters they fail because they are not able to find the product via the market fit right then they then they have a lot of friction in order to get sales or revenues or users so friction no significant traction so no investor trust you because you don't have significant traction and then good game over okay so our main goal during the program that's why I use a word processor or a structure but also our big network of contacts is to help these guys to move your assumptions to a real product feed market feed company and because at the end of the day you wouldn't start up I mean you have your network you are your co-founders your network of 10 15 people around you and you are trying to base the in basing the assumptions or what you believe what you think and the people around you that unfortunately is not you know right because you're trying to build something that pretend to be disruptive or pretend to captured a big portion of the market well the likelihood that you and your small group is going to be able to do the so is a chance so we we put then in our process we allow them to have contact with a lot of people with paraphilias people in order to validate all these assumptions and do this Lean Startup and test and to iterate and to change a lot of things in order to by the end of the program hopefully having then much more close to the bottom feeder market because you have a much better for the feeder market feed well you might be kind of super great company or not but the chances on the likelihood to be to stay in the market it's gonna be much more high yeah and Barcelona as a city we're all in Barcelona we're all operating from Barcelona a city that's growing very rapidly in terms of startups innovation and also accelerators incubators and venture builders but not what do you think is it a good thing for a city in itself to have a lot of these players active when I talk to people at events and around the city people saying oh I didn't know it was so many accelerators here like this is a very positive thing but for the accelerators itself probably you would want to be the only one that's here right so what what do you think do you think it's it's a good thing or I do think it's a good thing for society in general and for for enterpreneurs of course they have bigger choice so I think it's good that there are 2,000 accelerators and and if there were 20,000 it would be better another thing is that accelerators are sustainable and profitable business models that's another separate issue but I think it's very good that we give resources to people that is thinking on starting an idea and they have no clue whatsoever where to start from and so any kind of help you can give to these people at these stages it it helps a lot yeah you you are moving more out over to the boutique kind of doing an acceleration or as a venture Bueller as you call it and all the accelerators are basically they have different type of programs but they look kind of similar from from the outside do you think more accelerators will you know evolve into this venture a builder thing or how do you see in the next five years well it's funny because you have here two different two different people that started in sort of different ways but I think we are both going to the same model but not on myself on there Hannah hell started up with a different model but with a better branding and better well-known company all over Europe so and and he's very niche oriented very vertically oriented so I think those are the two models are will probably prevail I don't think there is the traditional accelerators that just bring mentors into the companies I don't think that could be sustainable over time unless there are migrating towards helping companies develop their own in in company programs which is for example what what connector is doing I think that would help a lot with sustainability for for them but I think in the end in my perspective is that the best model for some type of people for example in our case or a case of permit is the company wheeler I mean we feel more comfortable with that model we believe that we can create a lot of value with that model and well our progress so far is make me make me think that we are on there on the right track right and there's always a lot of developers and entrepreneurs watching and listening to this podcast and I'm he'll do people that are thinking should I enter an accelerator is this the right choice to me in your opinion what kind of startup what what do you need to have to apply for an accelerator what do you think well as we said before I mean there are different types of a Cerritos I think the first thing I will I will tell the entrepreneurs is to do the homework I mean to understand the stage that they are right now to understand any accelerator what they are looking for their oscillators or incubators that they are targeting pre acceleration companies or pre idea or idea state so there are different states at these early days of the companies they have to understand what they are in because different accelerators are targeting to different kind of teams or the different kind of companies so the first thing is to do your homework try to understand which are the cell raters incubators or venture builders that are really fitting in what you are right now second thing is trying to understand how these guys are going to help me I mean it's to really the same way that the when you are trying to raise money you try to understand more and more the investors do the same thing with the cell rate or try to understand who are the guys behind rado behind incubator behind the venture builder what's your bag down how are you planning to help me be very soft stick with that because it's some kind of Mario's most of these relationship ends with an equity a change so it's going to be your partner it's not going to be for the next three months it's gonna be forever so do your homework and and to be honest I mean the teams are much more successful where the teams are were much more demanding at the beginning right being very why you're gonna help me what are the things that you're gonna me can't you this kind of list of things is something that you believe that we can achieve within the program trying to understand what are the outcomes of the program it's not yes go to website apply online I mean try to have these one on one interviews and in my experience the best things are the ones are much more demanding trying to understand what are gonna be the outcome of the stellarator and is there any like misconceptions of startups applying that they're thinking that you can can give them something that you can't give them there are a lot of misconceptions and I think this is one of the issues of the of the accelerators I mean I agree with Bernard saying that as much as we can it's going to be great it's as far as all of them can deliver enough quality value because this is at the installation that is not a clear definition right Nessa said before I mean most entrepreneurs are confused what doesn't mean I mean it's gonna be a table and one mentor coming two days a week or whatever is gonna be like we do 30 workshops 15 people really helping me every day plus 80 mentor whatever so it's not clear so I mean it's good to have a lot of a straight or Sieben in Barcelona as far as most of think and deliver enough level of quality because if not intrapreneurs are joining this straight to the may be is not delivering enough level of quality and there is a bad feeling right and this is then affecting the others that we are trying to do in a proper way right right we are not talking about model here that is a pre accelerator which is what start narrator is something where entrepreneurs can come and come be there for at least six weeks can have an exposition to Mentors but we are not requiring any equity from them or any kind of payment in any kind of mining right so basically we are just giving to that yeah so that's how good thing for them I mean for entrepreneurs in order to for the less experienced people to take and to have a first feeling of what it is to win in an accelerator so I think this kind of program is also a good thing for people with without experience but if you have some more experience and you've been already into a pre accelerator or some other experience which could help then it's a matter of finding out exactly what is that you are going to be given from that program in particular and see if it really matches what you really need and you have some success stories as well like also like it it Megan and startup bootcamp what are like the factors within these companies that that you call them success stories well it depends also it begins by the entrepreneur by the entrepreneurial team I think it's one of the most important elements the other element is the the sector in which they are in and the time in which they got into that into that sector we have a very good experience in e-commerce there was a company that was astir have five years ago and we have a also very bad story on another ecommerce company that started like two years or three years ago so the thing is three years ago for a fashion equivalence for example was too late and there was a that thing was very rude but the opportunity we probably wasn't there anymore because solando was already there with a huge investment and asus was already the UK so it wasn't anymore an opportunity despite the team was I would team deliver you know what they had to deliver so I guess if you take a look at those two issues you probably have fifty percent of the issues you need to take a look already there then there are other other issues like for example the capability of the team to get investment which is obviously something very very important as well but I would say those three issues are probably the most important ones in my case it is clear everybody is saying in all levels of the chain right intrapreneur is the most important thing right but I think it's much more important in this kind of vehicles we're talking about when you build the roster orators to have someone open-minded I mean flexible and with the ability to listen the ability to because his cell rate or some bunch of business all about that I mean this is that is now initial business plan that is going to be made so the things are gonna change so and things are going to change much better if you are listening and you are learning from what you are getting so you ask him be forming with it what you have to look at the decelerator or a venture builder when you are looking for I also mean they also have to take a look inside and so if they are ready to really go through this kind of process because I mean is there are people I you know listening I mean these people are saying I'm listening you but they are not listening me right and it's not that we have to take your decision but you have to be open-minded open to change flexible those are very important skills that you should have if you want to be part of one of one of these companies of process right and how is it for you to because but not said that we are interested in getting talent like developers marketers the best ones but but you usually start with my idea right you usually start with the entrepreneur when you take people in how do you I make sure that they have the right kind of talent already inside the team all it's a combination of a lot of things and something that you developed from time to time to really understand yes for you to put an example during our selection process I mean as I said before I mean we start with a big thing a big database and we nail down and at the end we finish with inviting 20 teams to parcel enough to stay for the week with us from this year we have 20 teams fronting was 12 different countries Australia Hindi and so on so with these two days we do a lot of things for instance one of the things that we do is to have some psychologist interview in these these people I mean is what something that we learn from this period is trying to understand if because someone could be a good entrepreneur but at the end we need a team is that in gonna be able to work together well it's another layer of information in order to validate this make sense or not right and but not for many when I speak people venture builder is something a bit cryptic it's a bit new and a venture builder it's not given that everybody knows what that is right away but we just started a new company at evening is called factorial can you tell us a bit the process I guess this is a process that you haven't done yet but like how do you plan to help this company within it Nick how do you plan to support a new company because it's a bit special we start something right now so you say Ben to build it is cryptic it's because we give fancy names to things yeah it used to be a group of companies right it's a growth companies and so how do how does it work it doesn't have a fixed way to work and that's why we don't have a program or you know and so we try to look for talent continuously to work in our startups and we do events with the workshops with our kind of stuff like other accelerators would do and but our goal is to find talent to work in our startups and then since we start the relationship with these people a professional relationship in in in all of our startups we start understanding how do they perform and how do they work in marketing in development whatever and then when once we know these people we know how to perform we know how do they work in their teams then we are in a better position and to think of investing on those people so that's your final or final stats through professional relationship we work together and then we consider why don't we start a company together so it's the opposite way right so we try to look for performance people who do worse you know and then we at the same time we analyze markets and we come up with ideas and we have limited resources we cannot be starting everything in the world like maybe drugget internet - no hmm so we try to the boat or small resources to the biggest opportunities we find and that's how it works we also get in contact with our with a network of investors that that are very related to - to what we do and they invested a cleaner companies so we never we never wanted to raise money in it Nick so we would have a problem a conflict of interest because then we would have to accept projects and look for projects and and we would have to enter projects in a certain amount of time so we try our investors - we tell our investors to invest directly in our companies and we are focused solely completely on growing our companies and and growing or companies as a business because that's you talked before about misconceptions I think one of the biggest misconceptions is that getting funded is growing your business and this happens a lot with mental builder and an accelerator so we have a sort of a conflict of interest here because and we think that our business model ultimately is is exiting companies and having two turns and equity so and we push sometimes companies to get funded two three value and to get revalued and raise the value of the company and then or returns an equity are bigger but for business to make sense I the purpose is to grow as a business so to make the business sustainable but also scalable and and that should be the ultimate goal not finding and over funding and over funding which is what is happening and sometimes and it creates sort of small bubbles in different sectors so I think that the purpose of a business is to grow with as little resources as possible and with as little dilution as possible great that was everything we had time for unfortunately forty-five minutes go by fast but let's stay tuned for our next podcast in in December remember that you can catch the highlights from from this podcast in video form on on ethnic blog and or on our Facebook and everywhere we are online thank you again uh elevation but not for coming I really appreciate taking your time you are all very busy so I really appreciate it and my name is Sandra oblong and I remember to follow ethnic for for more quality tech discussions also in the future [Music]