Transcripción
The Startup Accelerator Business Model And The Emergence Of Venture Builders — vídeo y transcripción
You can also read the blog post here: http://buff.ly/2gHfTv2 In our November podcast we talked about how the increasing number of accelerators are making it harder and harder to produce winner programs. An emergence of venture builders or
Título
The Startup Accelerator Business Model And The Emergence Of Venture Builders — vídeo y transcripción
Resumen
You can also read the blog post here: http://buff.ly/2gHfTv2
In our November podcast we talked about how the increasing number of accelerators are making it harder and harder to produce winner programs. An emergence of venture builders or company builders, focusing on fewer projects with a deeper focus on each project, is maybe what more and more accelerators will turn into.
Puntos clave
- [Music] welcome to the ethnic podcast and my name is Sandra Holland today we will discuss the differences between startup accelerators incubators and venture builders if they work for startups and if so what's the success factors and we're super lucky to have with us some great people we had angle Garcia director of startup bootcamp IOT data and cybersecurity was a Patricio Hunt managing partner of intellectual and also the ethnic president Pernod Ferraro welcome to you all thank you be here so to start off with young he'll you've been involved with startup bootcamp for a while now couple years you also invested in a couple of the projects yourself what is it that you find so interesting with with this type of program compared to just regular seed funding well I finished our different things I mean city funded our cellar a toes and incubators there are a lot of animals probably we're going to discuss it in the during the podcasts are completely different things Anthony's a serratus are to some extent trying to prepare these teams sometimes even don't even companies these teams to be some kind of investable company or an investable startup right so we are early I think in the in the process of the funding so I don't think that we have to compare such investment with celery toes or a complete different animals the things that we are looking for our different I'm probably something that we're going to discuss today right right what are you finding appealing with with these kind of programs what what are the big pros for you well as a personal level accelerator is something that you are really much more deep into the people I mean it's a lot about the personal relationship I mean really helping in a day to day basis to these guys son invested I mean you take some distance right them is much more a financial investment it's also a financial investment foreign selector but these are other much more personal factors I mean you mean you're gonna really try to help these guys to make the dream a reality right this is you are going to the personal level so it's something much more much more personal that when you are I get an investor then you start to have your legal implications and your financial rules and this kind of thing so you're moving to a different level I think that both elements are necessary in an ecosystem but are doing different things and act in a different stage and petitio you have a different approach more than like a traditional accelerator with a six month program right tell us a little bit about your approach to startups and how startups approach you well we have different models actually because we running the tech stars startup next program which is a traditional program or you have a selection process in the beginning applicants that are interested in in getting in etc and that's a batch process and we do it twice a year and then we have our let's say our own boutique accelerator which is Internet tube and there we do whatever we think is best for our company and depends a lot in the context of the company the team the stage of the company our interest in the company as well so we do a very different thing there we usually do one or two companies every year only that we really do a let's say we do a custom fit program and we just concentrate on what the team really needs and it's a very different approach so why did you choose this approach instead of as you are affiliated with the tech stars the more traditional program what did you choose to do this kind of thing basically we are doing things us as we see there require in the rhythm is not something that we have a device in a very specific way we are always sort of innovating on the periphery of the of things and we are looking finding exactly what are the best opportunities that we have there and we go behind those opportunities at the same time for example last year we founded a mobile venture builder because we thought there was a perhaps a more interesting model for us and it was probably a model that was better for our skills so now we are very focused on that program as well and we are doing things as they are coming to us and taking opportunities mostly rather than how very let's say focus strategy based on exactly things that we think are that we have to do I mean we're more open to innovation rather than designing what we want to exactly and talking about venture builders but not you used to be ethnic used to be a very traditional accelerator used to call it the hacker accelerator once but but it changed a bit the last time can you tell us about what has to change and when you speak to people now what do you call it Nick hmm so we never meant to be a traditional accelerator so that's why we call it the hacker accelerator but basically what we did what we did in our short span of life is experimenting so we tried different models and we experimented and we reached to the conclusion that a fixed program with a set of mentors with a certain amount of resources devoted to each project and with the need of having to do n number of projects every n number of time was not possible for us we studied the mother we analyzed it and we realized that it was not possible at least for us and so we decided to move away from this model and and start companies and commit about committing the companies that we were growing so increasing our participation and our effort in smaller companies instead of doing a model based on quantity time statistics so we we tried to focus on smaller projects on a small number of projects and then commit on these projects forever not just for a period of time but making sure that if we are something and we take something out of this project it will be along with the other enterpreneurs that are that are doing it so we we take big bigger stakes in the companies that we work and we take full responsibility we don't look for winners we make them and we make winner teams and winner projects we are continuously striving to find the greatest talent and we take responsibility of funding the projects of of the success of the project in the long term hmm so that's a difference in the mother we then we don't participate in a bad way in a very early stage in a short amount or close amount of time and we take responsibility almost forever in the projects right then okay you have been sorry to campus is one of the more successful accelerators in Europe one would say and but but the business model business model itself as Bernard says they went away from it that was their own choice but but how are you looking at the business model do you find it successful itself or is it too early to say what do you think it's a very good question because the thing that the other day I was speaking well I don't remember what it was but he was talking about the salah laid off right and i did some kind of research about and i find out that what it was at angel is that there are two thousand accelerators in the world which is not true it's not true which is true is the there are 2,000 companies or entities that are claiming to be an accelerator because at the end of the day I mean you take a look to all these two thousand websites and all of the necessary half workshops I have mentors and I'm gonna move you to the next level and blah blah blah blah blah but at the end the reality is that most of them they are starting today and in two years from now and and windier for now they have to rethink about the model because the model is not sustainable yes by definition means you are trying to have some tables and chairs and if you are not don't have enough money in order to deliver enough value so you're trying to make money with the equity that you are taking in these companies but at the same time you have enough resources in order to deliver enough value to these companies well it's trying to do a circle with that square it's gonna be a challenge I think that there are some players out there I'm not saying that we are better or not but we have a different model I mean we have these corporations support in our province and I'm talking not only about to start a boot camp but also techstars of black and play or the guys from Y Combinator of all 500 starters in the US that we have these corporations investing or supporting our programs in order to have access to innovation and that's what makes our business model sustainable I mean there are few solar leaders in the world that they have been in the market for more than six seven years around the ones that are describing and of course that we are changing things internally but we have find out is way a sustainable business model that if you look around is it's not in others always have to rethink about different ways to do it different ways to find sources of finding in order to be able to get money back from this equity stake that's the set before I mean we don't have enough resources to invest in these companies the likelihood to get a lot of money from this equity stake is right so very poor right so we have been doing other things sorcery changing things focusing more and more in the vertical thing right that probably we are going to speak later I mean is one of the futures of accelerators trying to be much more specific in something but again everything that we have this specific business model that allows our to provide or deliver at least more resources and we believe that more value that little players in the market positio you have also been involved with this traditional type of programs but as we talked about like the accelerate accelerate that's all only been around for a couple of years it's a fairly new new thing so when when can we say that accelerator is the success at what time is it too early or is it in the future what do you think I think that like who was saying there are many type of accelerators and you can call accelerators really just a few of them so basically I think those that are focused on verticals will probably be more successful in the long term also the first accelerators the world ones that are more consolidated like Y Combinator tech stars start at bootcamp and a few others probably because they were the first to market and because they have this effect of being able to select the best companies all over the world those are probably going to stand out and going to continue in a success for the rest what you have to do to see if you can find a specific model that may deliver some special value to the companies that you are looking for specifically but should be like a very very let's say focused group of companies and I guess those ones are the ones that are going to prevail right right for us the model let's say in our case we've been going from the hybrid custom-fit sort of program that we deliver we only do that as I said before just for a couple of companies perhaps each year and then we also Bernard was saying we found out these along many years and looking for well whatever the best thing for us to do and finally we came to the conclusion that a company will there was in our case the best thing to to concentrate our deliberate efforts on the other hand as I was saying also you have to remain sort of open to innovate on the periphery so if they come to us a couple of teams every year that we see that they're really good and we can help them we do that I mean we help them in the way that they need and in the way that is better for them to eat we have but our deliberate efforts now are just focus on the company wielder which we see that is the best model for us in order to build companies it's a kind of model perhaps it's more closer to whatever nut is doing we we select further we'll go all the other way I mean we select the space in which we want to innovate we look for a company that would validate our concept then we select the technology we build the technology we get traction in the market and if we get real traction then we'll go and try to find that team that would be able to take this to a success or to a spin-off that could be successful in the long term so this is a completely different model we believe in in our case in particular that this is the best for us to we believe that's the model where we can be more successful and this is why we do that yeah I have a question related to that yes no please please go ahead and I think it's interesting to analyze what we define as sustainable and how sustainable is a goal by itself so is it is it not profitable the goal of any business so shouldn't we create profitable business but still and I would like to understand how an accelerator can be sustainable and and how an accelerator can be profitable on what's a ball and what's the time span needed for that so I think that those are the biggest questions I'd realizes in the world even the first accelerators in 2005 Paula Hammond started Dominator think tech stuff was one year later no something like that 2006 and these are the old examples the oldest from them many accelerators appeared as you said and but I think none of them are still or have enough track record today to say that they are profitable business models even Y Combinator so to say they are profitable you have to set and expect an expectation at some point and you have to fit this expectation but Y Combinator grow so big that they get increasing their expectation so now they even expect to be way more weak and they are getting the best deal flow in the world so when it's an accelerator well when can we call an accelerator a sustainable business model or a profitable business model is it mean does it mean that you have a source for investment that keeps coming or or whatever you mean to your uncle for example or a sustainable model is something that you can keep in the time right something that you can keep doing for a lot of time sure and I think all these models are clearly sustainable because they have been in the market for a lot of period of time don't thing about that the model is only to make money with the equity in the companies they are also making money with the corporations and but I think the the the best way to look at that I mean these guys have been in the market for a long time all the guys are not longer in the market so there are guys that are sustainable the guys are not sustainable and we're talking about all these guys in the market it's a big group nearly 2,000 accelerators yeah you're trying to get the best talent to startup bootcamp every year or every a for every program doesn't it make it harder for you guys to attract the best companies when you're competing with suddenly thousands of other people around around the world what does it is make it's it's becoming a very crowded space it's true I mean only in our last call this year we analyzed something like a hundred 50 startups in the IOT and data space only domain I mean it's a significant number of startups of course out of the 850 we easily find that half of these probably is not are not fitting in what we are looking for but I think that this year we spoke and we change information with around 350 400 startups from a lot of countries all around the wall then we nail down the database and we try to so the point is that the space is so crowded as I said before and sometimes for entrepreneurs so difficult to understand which is the right choice for me right I mean in some times they are much more focused in trying to understand how much money these guys are going to offer to me any change of how much equity right not paying attention in order to understand what they can get from the program right the reality is that becoming more and more difficult to attractive especially there are locations are very crowd like London or Berlin to move teams and waved on these kind of locations it's very difficult but at the end eme were provided the point is that you have to devote much more efforts I mean you have to put many more resources this year we have like 780 sculptors working for four months trying to find the best things because you have to get in contact with these teams there are in Poland or in Russia and you have to explain then the value that you can provide to them because it's for them as I said before it's very difficult you take a look to the website of Loretta Sullivan looks at same thing so but this is a very economical deal for us right I mean it's well but it's not about this I mean it's about all the things I mean where are the resources that you are gonna get which about the program what you're gonna do during the 90 days who are the guys that are involved in the simulator with your background so all the things to share with these themes but it's an effort that you have to do in order to be able to share with these guys and help them to take a decision and this this again does something with the business model as well you know when you can't find enough great companies to enter your accelerator and the oil companies are just divided all over Europe how will this evolve you know in the next years if two gets it gets harder and harder and harder to attract good companies how will what do you think Patrizio well if you look at what we do really we are reactive in terms of intellect amid self we are reactive if we find a team that we feel it's the right team and they have the right product then we invest resources but as Bernardo say we don't have a specific number of startup that we are looking forward to accelerate or incubate each year so we are open to find an opportunity and then invest on that opportunity on the other hand since that is a reactive strategy then we decided to come up with a venture wielder because that's a deliberate strategy for us so there we don't wait for capturing talent or acquire in Thailand we just go behind a company or create in a company that we will live in because we see that the trend is correct the technology is the right time to invest technology etcetera etcetera so in that regard we are not waiting for we're not scouting to find the right talent with the right idea which is a more difficult thing to find I mean we are first developing idea then we are finding the talent but if you want to find both all together that's what it's becoming more and more difficult so what we do is we bring together both and we are very good and we can be very good we live and we are doing some some progress in that we are creating the opportunity finding the talent it's a different thing we think we can do it as well but if we do this in a separated way we think we can be more successful and it's going to be for us easier to deliver a sustainable business model in time right you're not scouting scouting at all for companies anymore how are you picking because I venture builder like how are you picking your projects how are you getting in touch with entrepreneurs so we don't get in touch with inter we used to do it in the past and we devoted a lot of resources to listen to projects and to meeting enterpreneurs and that's a full-time job and it gets it requires a lot of reserve time and it's one of the most important parts of any accelerator because it's were you get in contact with your deal flow and where you can select well and an accelerator it's all about tilt flow and selecting so it's a very important part so we don't we're no longer an accelerator so we don't don't devote resources to to screen projects or see enterpreneurs anymore so what we do is we spend some time investigating markets and we do we plan with the business plans with your experiments on exit which is very easy and and then we study we're continuously connected and studying the opportunities around the world without raising money that are trendy for some reason and we try to extrapolate it in other markets so that's where we are spending our resources right now we are analyzing market and of course from evening and what we're trying to do is we're trying to attract talent but not talent of interpreters a ton of people who can do things so we love techie people we love developers we love marketers we think that's a hard thing the hard thing is to be able to do things by yourself and then anyone can become an entrepreneur one day so the idea is not a hard thing but finding people that can actually do it exactly so so so we're not focusing anymore on the idea at all so we don't want ideas we don't want projects we don't want Beach no and we want people that it's interesting that they can do things and we are analyzing the markets because there are so many opportunities out there so at some point we try to mix them together and Anthony's is very important not only for accellerate or benji builder and any kind of player that we want to help to set up business from intrapreneurs with startups to have a pretty good understanding of the market I mean is we are in a very dynamic market things are changing so fast so have good understanding and devote a lot of resources a lot of time in trying to understand what's next why this is next is really relevant and at the end of the day we also need excellent people in order to execute these kind of things but it's very important to understand the space or the domain that you want to play exactly then when you deploy started from from sort of bootcamp after like a finished program do you look at it you know three months happy or a year after and say this was a success this was a success acceleration or do you have to wait until you see an exit or an extras acquisition or well a deep at the end is ready with the startups depends how you measure success right that could be most of the people used to say how much money does it start to raise and we have pretty good numbers you can go to our website or how many customers or how successful the company from the sales point of view for me that is another great or another number that is very good is how many of the starters that have gone through our programs after X many years are still alive and we have a number that are in our website that eighteen right now is 82 percent of the 350 or whatever startups that have gone through our programs our life it's an average but after seven eight years there is a big number of starters that are alive and and I think that this is a combination of a lot of things probably number one is is the selection with Julia I mean we spend a lot of resources in trying to bring the best guys mainly the best guys number two is the program I mean our program has been growing I mean we have been learning when you are doing this for a lot of years you understand the things that we have to do and the things that you don't have to right but the main goal for our paren is to really help these startups early stages start after they already have some product or maybe some initial traction this is what we are looking for to really find the product feet on the market feet what we are trying to do most of the starters they fail because they are not able to find the product via the market fit right then they then they have a lot of friction in order to get sales or revenues or users so friction no significant traction so no investor trust you because you don't have significant traction and then good game over okay so our main goal during the program that's why I use a word processor or a structure but also our big network of contacts is to help these guys to move your assumptions to a real product feed market feed company and because at the end of the day you wouldn't start up I mean you have your network you are your co-founders your network of 10 15 people around you and you are trying to base the in basing the assumptions or what you believe what you think and the people around you that unfortunately is not you know right because you're trying to build something that pretend to be disruptive or pretend to captured a big portion of the market well the likelihood that you and your small group is going to be able to do the so is a chance so we we put then in our process we allow them to have contact with a lot of people with paraphilias people in order to validate all these assumptions and do this Lean Startup and test and to iterate and to change a lot of things in order to by the end of the program hopefully having then much more close to the bottom feeder market because you have a much better for the feeder market feed well you might be kind of super great company or not but the chances on the likelihood to be to stay in the market it's gonna be much more high yeah and Barcelona as a city we're all in Barcelona we're all operating from Barcelona a city that's growing very rapidly in terms of startups innovation and also accelerators incubators and venture builders but not what do you think is it a good thing for a city in itself to have a lot of these players active when I talk to people at events and around the city people saying oh I didn't know it was so many accelerators here like this is a very positive thing but for the accelerators itself probably you would want to be the only one that's here right so what what do you think do you think it's it's a good thing or I do think it's a good thing for society in general and for for enterpreneurs of course they have bigger choice so I think it's good that there are 2,000 accelerators and and if there were 20,000 it would be better another thing is that accelerators are sustainable and profitable business models that's another separate issue but I think it's very good that we give resources to people that is thinking on starting an idea and they have no clue whatsoever where to start from and so any kind of help you can give to these people at these stages it it helps a lot yeah you you are moving more out over to the boutique kind of doing an acceleration or as a venture Bueller as you call it and all the accelerators are basically they have different type of programs but they look kind of similar from from the outside do you think more accelerators will you know evolve into this venture a builder thing or how do you see in the next five years well it's funny because you have here two different two different people that started in sort of different ways but I think we are both going to the same model but not on myself on there Hannah hell started up with a different model but with a better branding and better well-known company all over Europe so and and he's very niche oriented very vertically oriented so I think those are the two models are will probably prevail I don't think there is the traditional accelerators that just bring mentors into the companies I don't think that could be sustainable over time unless there are migrating towards helping companies develop their own in in company programs which is for example what what connector is doing I think that would help a lot with sustainability for for them but I think in the end in my perspective is that the best model for some type of people for example in our case or a case of permit is the company wheeler I mean we feel more comfortable with that model we believe that we can create a lot of value with that model and well our progress so far is make me make me think that we are on there on the right track right and there's always a lot of developers and entrepreneurs watching and listening to this podcast and I'm he'll do people that are thinking should I enter an accelerator is this the right choice to me in your opinion what kind of startup what what do you need to have to apply for an accelerator what do you think well as we said before I mean there are different types of a Cerritos I think the first thing I will I will tell the entrepreneurs is to do the homework I mean to understand the stage that they are right now to understand any accelerator what they are looking for their oscillators or incubators that they are targeting pre acceleration companies or pre idea or idea state so there are different states at these early days of the companies they have to understand what they are in because different accelerators are targeting to different kind of teams or the different kind of companies so the first thing is to do your homework try to understand which are the cell raters incubators or venture builders that are really fitting in what you are right now second thing is trying to understand how these guys are going to help me I mean it's to really the same way that the when you are trying to raise money you try to understand more and more the investors do the same thing with the cell rate or try to understand who are the guys behind rado behind incubator behind the venture builder what's your bag down how are you planning to help me be very soft stick with that because it's some kind of Mario's most of these relationship ends with an equity a change so it's going to be your partner it's not going to be for the next three months it's gonna be forever so do your homework and and to be honest I mean the teams are much more successful where the teams are were much more demanding at the beginning right being very why you're gonna help me what are the things that you're gonna me can't you this kind of list of things is something that you believe that we can achieve within the program trying to understand what are the outcomes of the program it's not yes go to website apply online I mean try to have these one on one interviews and in my experience the best things are the ones are much more demanding trying to understand what are gonna be the outcome of the stellarator and is there any like misconceptions of startups applying that they're thinking that you can can give them something that you can't give them there are a lot of misconceptions and I think this is one of the issues of the of the accelerators I mean I agree with Bernard saying that as much as we can it's going to be great it's as far as all of them can deliver enough quality value because this is at the installation that is not a clear definition right Nessa said before I mean most entrepreneurs are confused what doesn't mean I mean it's gonna be a table and one mentor coming two days a week or whatever is gonna be like we do 30 workshops 15 people really helping me every day plus 80 mentor whatever so it's not clear so I mean it's good to have a lot of a straight or Sieben in Barcelona as far as most of think and deliver enough level of quality because if not intrapreneurs are joining this straight to the may be is not delivering enough level of quality and there is a bad feeling right and this is then affecting the others that we are trying to do in a proper way right right we are not talking about model here that is a pre accelerator which is what start narrator is something where entrepreneurs can come and come be there for at least six weeks can have an exposition to Mentors but we are not requiring any equity from them or any kind of payment in any kind of mining right so basically we are just giving to that yeah so that's how good thing for them I mean for entrepreneurs in order to for the less experienced people to take and to have a first feeling of what it is to win in an accelerator so I think this kind of program is also a good thing for people with without experience but if you have some more experience and you've been already into a pre accelerator or some other experience which could help then it's a matter of finding out exactly what is that you are going to be given from that program in particular and see if it really matches what you really need and you have some success stories as well like also like it it Megan and startup bootcamp what are like the factors within these companies that that you call them success stories well it depends also it begins by the entrepreneur by the entrepreneurial team I think it's one of the most important elements the other element is the the sector in which they are in and the time in which they got into that into that sector we have a very good experience in e-commerce there was a company that was astir have five years ago and we have a also very bad story on another ecommerce company that started like two years or three years ago so the thing is three years ago for a fashion equivalence for example was too late and there was a that thing was very rude but the opportunity we probably wasn't there anymore because solando was already there with a huge investment and asus was already the UK so it wasn't anymore an opportunity despite the team was I would team deliver you know what they had to deliver so I guess if you take a look at those two issues you probably have fifty percent of the issues you need to take a look already there then there are other other issues like for example the capability of the team to get investment which is obviously something very very important as well but I would say those three issues are probably the most important ones in my case it is clear everybody is saying in all levels of the chain right intrapreneur is the most important thing right but I think it's much more important in this kind of vehicles we're talking about when you build the roster orators to have someone open-minded I mean flexible and with the ability to listen the ability to because his cell rate or some bunch of business all about that I mean this is that is now initial business plan that is going to be made so the things are gonna change so and things are going to change much better if you are listening and you are learning from what you are getting so you ask him be forming with it what you have to look at the decelerator or a venture builder when you are looking for I also mean they also have to take a look inside and so if they are ready to really go through this kind of process because I mean is there are people I you know listening I mean these people are saying I'm listening you but they are not listening me right and it's not that we have to take your decision but you have to be open-minded open to change flexible those are very important skills that you should have if you want to be part of one of one of these companies of process right and how is it for you to because but not said that we are interested in getting talent like developers marketers the best ones but but you usually start with my idea right you usually start with the entrepreneur when you take people in how do you I make sure that they have the right kind of talent already inside the team all it's a combination of a lot of things and something that you developed from time to time to really understand yes for you to put an example during our selection process I mean as I said before I mean we start with a big thing a big database and we nail down and at the end we finish with inviting 20 teams to parcel enough to stay for the week with us from this year we have 20 teams fronting was 12 different countries Australia Hindi and so on so with these two days we do a lot of things for instance one of the things that we do is to have some psychologist interview in these these people I mean is what something that we learn from this period is trying to understand if because someone could be a good entrepreneur but at the end we need a team is that in gonna be able to work together well it's another layer of information in order to validate this make sense or not right and but not for many when I speak people venture builder is something a bit cryptic it's a bit new and a venture builder it's not given that everybody knows what that is right away but we just started a new company at evening is called factorial can you tell us a bit the process I guess this is a process that you haven't done yet but like how do you plan to help this company within it Nick how do you plan to support a new company because it's a bit special we start something right now so you say Ben to build it is cryptic it's because we give fancy names to things yeah it used to be a group of companies right it's a growth companies and so how do how does it work it doesn't have a fixed way to work and that's why we don't have a program or you know and so we try to look for talent continuously to work in our startups and we do events with the workshops with our kind of stuff like other accelerators would do and but our goal is to find talent to work in our startups and then since we start the relationship with these people a professional relationship in in in all of our startups we start understanding how do they perform and how do they work in marketing in development whatever and then when once we know these people we know how to perform we know how do they work in their teams then we are in a better position and to think of investing on those people so that's your final or final stats through professional relationship we work together and then we consider why don't we start a company together so it's the opposite way right so we try to look for performance people who do worse you know and then we at the same time we analyze markets and we come up with ideas and we have limited resources we cannot be starting everything in the world like maybe drugget internet - no hmm so we try to the boat or small resources to the biggest opportunities we find and that's how it works we also get in contact with our with a network of investors that that are very related to - to what we do and they invested a cleaner companies so we never we never wanted to raise money in it Nick so we would have a problem a conflict of interest because then we would have to accept projects and look for projects and and we would have to enter projects in a certain amount of time so we try our investors - we tell our investors to invest directly in our companies and we are focused solely completely on growing our companies and and growing or companies as a business because that's you talked before about misconceptions I think one of the biggest misconceptions is that getting funded is growing your business and this happens a lot with mental builder and an accelerator so we have a sort of a conflict of interest here because and we think that our business model ultimately is is exiting companies and having two turns and equity so and we push sometimes companies to get funded two three value and to get revalued and raise the value of the company and then or returns an equity are bigger but for business to make sense I the purpose is to grow as a business so to make the business sustainable but also scalable and and that should be the ultimate goal not finding and over funding and over funding which is what is happening and sometimes and it creates sort of small bubbles in different sectors so I think that the purpose of a business is to grow with as little resources as possible and with as little dilution as possible great that was everything we had time for unfortunately forty-five minutes go by fast but let's stay tuned for our next podcast in in December remember that you can catch the highlights from from this podcast in video form on on ethnic blog and or on our Facebook and everywhere we are online thank you again uh elevation but not for coming I really appreciate taking your time you are all very busy so I really appreciate it and my name is Sandra oblong and I remember to follow ethnic for for more quality tech discussions also in the future [Music]
Descripción
You can also read the blog post here: http://buff.ly/2gHfTv2
In our November podcast we talked about how the increasing number of accelerators are making it harder and harder to produce winner programs. An emergence of venture builders or company builders, focusing on fewer projects with a deeper focus on each project, is maybe what more and more accelerators will turn into. We invited Angel Garcia, director of Startupbootcamp IoT, Data and Cybersecurity, Patricio Hunt, Managing partner of Intelectium and Bernat Farrero, president of itnig to discuss the topic.
Check us out on social media:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/itnig/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/itnig
LinkedIn: http://buff.ly/2gHaXGr
Webiste: http://itnig.net
Visit our blog for more great startup content: https://blog.itnig.net/
We're always looking for talent to join our teams, check out: http://itnig.net/jobs.html
For weekly startup videos subscribe to our channel.
Company builders
Venture Builders
Startup Builders
Startup accelerators
Startup accelerators in Spain
How to join an accelerator
Captions con timestamps
Mostrar captions con tiempo Ocultar captions con tiempo
[00:02] [Music] [00:15] [00:15] welcome to the ethnic podcast and my [00:17] [00:17] name is Sandra Holland today we will [00:19] [00:19] discuss the differences between startup [00:21] [00:21] accelerators incubators and venture [00:23] [00:23] builders if they work for startups and [00:25] [00:25] if so what's the success factors and [00:27] [00:27] we're super lucky to have with us some [00:30] [00:30] great people we had angle Garcia [00:32] [00:32] director of startup bootcamp IOT data [00:34] [00:34] and cybersecurity was a Patricio Hunt [00:37] [00:37] managing partner of intellectual and [00:39] [00:39] also the ethnic president Pernod Ferraro [00:41] [00:41] welcome to you all thank you be here so [00:46] [00:46] to start off with young he'll you've [00:50] [00:50] been involved with startup bootcamp for [00:52] [00:52] a while now couple years you also [00:54] [00:54] invested in a couple of the projects [00:56] [00:56] yourself [00:58] [00:58] what is it that you find so interesting [01:00] [01:00] with with this type of program compared [01:03] [01:03] to just regular seed funding [01:05] [01:05] well I finished our different things I [01:09] [01:09] mean city funded our cellar a toes and [01:10] [01:10] incubators there are a lot of animals [01:12] [01:12] probably we're going to discuss it in [01:14] [01:14] the during the podcasts are completely [01:17] [01:17] different things Anthony's a serratus [01:19] [01:19] are to some extent trying to prepare [01:22] [01:22] these teams sometimes even don't even [01:25] [01:25] companies these teams to be some kind of [01:28] [01:28] investable [01:29] [01:29] company or an investable startup right [01:32] [01:32] so we are early I think in the in the [01:36] [01:36] process of the funding so I don't think [01:38] [01:38] that we have to compare such investment [01:40] [01:40] with celery toes or a complete different [01:42] [01:42] animals the things that we are looking [01:43] [01:43] for our different [01:45] [01:45] I'm probably something that we're going [01:47] [01:47] to discuss today right right what are [01:50] [01:50] you finding appealing with with these [01:52] [01:52] kind of programs what what are the big [01:53] [01:53] pros for you well as a personal level [01:58] [01:58] accelerator is something that you are [02:00] [02:00] really much more deep into the people I [02:04] [02:04] mean it's a lot about the personal [02:07] [02:07] relationship I mean really helping in a [02:09] [02:09] day to day basis to these guys [02:12] [02:12] son invested I mean you take some [02:13] [02:13] distance right them is much more a [02:15] [02:15] financial investment it's also a [02:17] [02:17] financial investment foreign selector [02:19] [02:19] but these are other much more personal [02:21] [02:21] factors I mean you mean you're gonna [02:23] [02:23] really try to help these guys to make [02:27] [02:27] the dream a reality right this is you [02:29] [02:29] are going to the personal level so it's [02:32] [02:32] something much more much more personal [02:34] [02:34] that when you are I get an investor then [02:36] [02:36] you start to have your legal [02:37] [02:37] implications and your financial [02:39] [02:39] rules and this kind of thing so you're [02:42] [02:42] moving to a different level I think that [02:44] [02:44] both [02:45] [02:45] elements are necessary in an ecosystem [02:49] [02:49] but are [02:51] [02:51] doing different things and act in a [02:54] [02:54] different stage [02:56] [02:56] and petitio you have a different [02:59] [02:59] approach more than like a traditional [03:01] [03:01] accelerator with a six month program [03:03] [03:03] right tell us a little bit about your [03:06] [03:06] approach to startups and how startups [03:07] [03:07] approach you well we have different [03:09] [03:09] models actually because we running the [03:12] [03:12] tech stars startup next program which is [03:15] [03:15] a traditional program or you have a [03:18] [03:18] selection process in the beginning [03:19] [03:19] applicants that are interested in in [03:23] [03:23] getting in etc and that's a batch [03:25] [03:25] process and we do it twice a year and [03:28] [03:28] then we have our [03:30] [03:30] let's say our own boutique accelerator [03:34] [03:34] which is Internet tube and there we do [03:36] [03:36] whatever we think is best for our [03:38] [03:38] company and depends a lot in the [03:41] [03:41] context of the company the team the [03:44] [03:44] stage of the company our interest in the [03:48] [03:48] company as well so we do a very [03:50] [03:50] different thing there we usually do one [03:53] [03:53] or two companies every year only that [03:55] [03:55] we really do a let's say we do a custom [04:01] [04:01] fit program and we just concentrate on [04:04] [04:04] what the team really needs and it's a [04:06] [04:06] very different approach so why did you [04:09] [04:09] choose this approach instead of as you [04:12] [04:12] are affiliated with the tech stars the [04:13] [04:13] more traditional program what did you [04:15] [04:15] choose to do this kind of thing [04:16] [04:16] basically we are doing things us as we [04:21] [04:21] see there require in the rhythm is not [04:25] [04:25] something that we have a device in a [04:28] [04:28] very specific way we are always sort of [04:32] [04:32] innovating on the periphery of the of [04:34] [04:34] things and we are looking finding [04:38] [04:38] exactly what are the best opportunities [04:41] [04:41] that we have there and we go behind [04:43] [04:43] those opportunities at the same time for [04:45] [04:45] example last year we founded a mobile [04:48] [04:48] venture builder because we thought there [04:51] [04:51] was a [04:51] [04:51] perhaps a more interesting model for us [04:55] [04:55] and it was probably a model that was [04:59] [04:59] better for our skills so now we are very [05:03] [05:03] focused on that program as well and we [05:06] [05:06] are doing things as they are coming to [05:09] [05:09] us and taking opportunities mostly [05:11] [05:11] rather than how very [05:13] [05:13] let's say focus strategy based on [05:16] [05:16] exactly things that we think are [05:20] [05:20] that we have to do I mean we're more [05:23] [05:23] open to innovation rather than designing [05:26] [05:26] what we want to exactly and talking [05:29] [05:29] about venture builders but not you used [05:32] [05:32] to be ethnic used to be a very [05:34] [05:34] traditional accelerator used to call it [05:36] [05:36] the hacker accelerator once but but it [05:39] [05:39] changed a bit the last time can you tell [05:43] [05:43] us about what has to change and when you [05:45] [05:45] speak to people now what do you call it [05:47] [05:47] Nick hmm so we never meant to be a [05:49] [05:49] traditional accelerator so that's why we [05:51] [05:51] call it the hacker accelerator [05:54] [05:54] but basically what we did what we did in [05:57] [05:57] our short span of life is experimenting [06:00] [06:00] so we tried different models and we [06:03] [06:03] experimented and we reached to the [06:06] [06:06] conclusion that a fixed program with a [06:11] [06:11] set of mentors with a certain amount of [06:13] [06:13] resources devoted to each project and [06:16] [06:16] with the need of having to do n number [06:20] [06:20] of projects every n number of time [06:23] [06:23] was not possible for us [06:26] [06:26] we studied the mother we analyzed it and [06:29] [06:29] we realized that it was not possible at [06:31] [06:31] least for us and so we decided to move [06:35] [06:35] away from this model and and start [06:37] [06:37] companies and commit about committing [06:40] [06:40] the companies that we were growing so [06:42] [06:42] increasing our participation and our [06:44] [06:44] effort in smaller companies instead of [06:47] [06:47] doing a model based on quantity time [06:51] [06:51] statistics so we we tried to focus on [06:55] [06:55] smaller projects on a small number of [06:57] [06:57] projects and [06:59] [06:59] then commit on these projects forever [07:02] [07:02] not just for a period of time but making [07:06] [07:06] sure that if we are something and we [07:10] [07:10] take something out of this project it [07:12] [07:12] will be along with the other [07:14] [07:14] enterpreneurs that are that are doing it [07:16] [07:16] so we we take big bigger stakes in the [07:20] [07:20] companies that we work and we take full [07:22] [07:22] responsibility we don't look for winners [07:24] [07:24] we make them and we make winner teams [07:27] [07:27] and winner projects we are continuously [07:30] [07:30] striving to find the greatest talent and [07:35] [07:35] we take responsibility of funding the [07:37] [07:37] projects of of the success of the [07:39] [07:39] project in the long term hmm so that's a [07:42] [07:42] difference in the mother we then we [07:44] [07:44] don't participate in a bad way in a very [07:45] [07:45] early stage in a short amount or close [07:49] [07:49] amount of time and we take [07:51] [07:51] responsibility almost forever in the [07:54] [07:54] projects right then okay you have been [07:57] [07:57] sorry to campus is one of the more [07:59] [07:59] successful [08:00] [08:00] accelerators in Europe one would say and [08:03] [08:03] but but the business model business [08:06] [08:06] model itself as Bernard says they went [08:08] [08:08] away from it that was their own choice [08:11] [08:11] but but how are you looking at the [08:13] [08:13] business model do you find it successful [08:16] [08:16] itself or is it too early to say what do [08:17] [08:17] you think [08:19] [08:19] it's a very good question because the [08:21] [08:21] thing that the other day I was speaking [08:23] [08:23] well I don't remember what it was but he [08:25] [08:25] was talking about the salah laid off [08:27] [08:27] right and i did some kind of research [08:29] [08:29] about and i find out that what it was at [08:32] [08:32] angel is that there are two thousand [08:34] [08:34] accelerators in the world which is not [08:36] [08:36] true it's not true which is true is the [08:40] [08:40] there are 2,000 companies or entities [08:42] [08:42] that are claiming to be an accelerator [08:44] [08:44] because at the end of the day I mean you [08:46] [08:46] take a look to all these two thousand [08:48] [08:48] websites and all of the necessary half [08:50] [08:50] workshops I have mentors and I'm gonna [08:52] [08:52] move you to the next level and blah blah [08:54] [08:54] blah blah blah but at the end the [08:57] [08:57] reality is that most of them they are [08:58] [08:58] starting today and in two years from now [09:01] [09:01] and and windier for now they have to [09:02] [09:02] rethink about the model because the [09:04] [09:04] model is not sustainable yes by [09:06] [09:06] definition means you are trying to have [09:07] [09:07] some tables and chairs and if you are [09:10] [09:10] not don't have enough money in order to [09:12] [09:12] deliver enough value so you're trying to [09:15] [09:15] make money with the equity that you are [09:17] [09:17] taking in these companies but at the [09:19] [09:19] same time you have enough resources in [09:21] [09:21] order to deliver enough value to these [09:22] [09:22] companies well it's trying to do a [09:26] [09:26] circle with that square it's gonna be a [09:28] [09:28] challenge I think that there are some [09:32] [09:32] players out there I'm not saying that we [09:34] [09:34] are better or not but we have a [09:35] [09:35] different model I mean we have these [09:37] [09:37] corporations support in our province and [09:39] [09:39] I'm talking not only about to start a [09:40] [09:40] boot camp but also techstars of black [09:42] [09:42] and play or the guys from Y Combinator [09:44] [09:44] of all 500 starters in the US that we [09:48] [09:48] have these corporations [09:50] [09:50] investing or supporting our programs in [09:53] [09:53] order to have access to innovation and [09:55] [09:55] that's what makes our business model [09:58] [09:58] sustainable I mean there are few solar [10:00] [10:00] leaders in the world that they have been [10:01] [10:01] in the market for more than six seven [10:03] [10:03] years around the ones that are [10:04] [10:04] describing and of course that we are [10:07] [10:07] changing things internally but we have [10:09] [10:09] find out is way a sustainable business [10:12] [10:12] model that if you look around is [10:16] [10:16] it's not in others always have to [10:18] [10:18] rethink about different ways to do it [10:21] [10:21] different ways to find [10:24] [10:24] sources of finding in order to be able [10:27] [10:27] to get money back from this equity stake [10:30] [10:30] that's the set before I mean we don't [10:32] [10:32] have enough resources to invest in these [10:33] [10:33] companies the likelihood to get a lot of [10:35] [10:35] money from this equity stake is right so [10:37] [10:37] very poor right so we have been doing [10:40] [10:40] other things sorcery changing things [10:42] [10:42] focusing more and more in the vertical [10:44] [10:44] thing right that probably we are going [10:47] [10:47] to speak later I mean is one of the [10:48] [10:48] futures of accelerators trying to be [10:50] [10:50] much more specific in something [10:53] [10:53] but again everything that we have this [10:55] [10:55] specific business model that allows our [10:57] [10:57] to provide or deliver at least more [11:01] [11:01] resources and we believe that more value [11:03] [11:03] that little players in the market [11:05] [11:05] positio you have also been involved with [11:08] [11:08] this traditional type of programs but as [11:12] [11:12] we talked about like the accelerate [11:14] [11:14] accelerate that's all only been around [11:16] [11:16] for a couple of years it's a fairly new [11:19] [11:19] new thing so when when can we say that [11:23] [11:23] accelerator is the success at what time [11:26] [11:26] is it too early or is it in the future [11:29] [11:29] what do you think I think that like who [11:32] [11:32] was saying there are many type of [11:34] [11:34] accelerators and you can call [11:36] [11:36] accelerators really just a few of them [11:40] [11:40] so basically I think those that are [11:43] [11:43] focused on verticals will probably be [11:47] [11:47] more successful in the long term also [11:50] [11:50] the first accelerators the world ones [11:54] [11:54] that are more consolidated like Y [11:56] [11:56] Combinator tech stars start at bootcamp [11:58] [11:58] and a few others probably because they [12:02] [12:02] were the first to market and because [12:03] [12:03] they have this effect of being able to [12:05] [12:05] select the best companies all over the [12:07] [12:07] world those are probably going to stand [12:10] [12:10] out and going to continue in a success [12:13] [12:13] for the rest what you have to do to see [12:16] [12:16] if you can find a specific model that [12:20] [12:20] may deliver some special value to the [12:24] [12:24] companies that you are looking for [12:26] [12:26] specifically but should be like a very [12:29] [12:29] very [12:31] [12:31] let's say focused group of companies and [12:36] [12:36] I guess those ones are the ones that are [12:39] [12:39] going to prevail right right for us the [12:43] [12:43] model let's say in our case we've been [12:46] [12:46] going from the hybrid custom-fit sort of [12:50] [12:50] program that we deliver we only do that [12:52] [12:52] as I said before just for a couple of [12:55] [12:55] companies perhaps each year and then we [12:59] [12:59] also Bernard was saying we found out [13:02] [13:02] these [13:04] [13:04] along many years and looking for well [13:07] [13:07] whatever the best thing for us to do and [13:10] [13:10] finally we came to the conclusion that a [13:12] [13:12] company will there was in our case the [13:15] [13:15] best thing to to concentrate our [13:18] [13:18] deliberate efforts on the other hand as [13:22] [13:22] I was saying also you have to remain [13:24] [13:24] sort of open to innovate on the [13:27] [13:27] periphery so if they come to us a couple [13:29] [13:29] of teams every year that we see that [13:32] [13:32] they're really good and we can help them [13:34] [13:34] we do that I mean we help them in the [13:37] [13:37] way that they need and in the way that [13:39] [13:39] is better for them to eat we have but [13:43] [13:43] our deliberate efforts now are just [13:45] [13:45] focus on the company wielder which we [13:48] [13:48] see that is the best model for us in [13:50] [13:50] order to build companies it's a kind of [13:52] [13:52] model perhaps it's more closer to [13:54] [13:55] whatever nut is doing we we select [13:58] [13:58] further we'll go all the other way I [14:01] [14:01] mean we select the space in which we [14:03] [14:03] want to innovate we look for a company [14:07] [14:07] that would validate our concept then we [14:10] [14:10] select the technology we build the [14:13] [14:13] technology we get traction in the market [14:16] [14:16] and if we get real traction then we'll [14:19] [14:19] go and try to find that team that would [14:21] [14:21] be able to take this to a success or to [14:24] [14:24] a spin-off that could be successful in [14:26] [14:26] the long term so this is a completely [14:28] [14:28] different model we believe in in our [14:31] [14:31] case in particular that this is the best [14:33] [14:33] for us to we believe that's the model [14:36] [14:36] where we can be more successful and this [14:39] [14:39] is why we do that yeah I have a question [14:43] [14:43] related to that yes no please please go [14:46] [14:46] ahead and I think it's interesting to [14:49] [14:49] analyze what we define as sustainable [14:51] [14:51] and how sustainable is a goal by itself [14:55] [14:55] so is it is it not profitable the goal [14:58] [14:58] of any business so shouldn't we create [15:01] [15:01] profitable business but still and I [15:05] [15:05] would like to understand how an [15:07] [15:07] accelerator can be sustainable and and [15:10] [15:10] how an accelerator can be profitable on [15:12] [15:12] what's a ball and what's the time span [15:14] [15:14] needed for that so I think that those [15:16] [15:16] are the biggest questions I'd realizes [15:19] [15:19] in the world even the first accelerators [15:21] [15:21] in 2005 Paula Hammond started Dominator [15:25] [15:25] think tech stuff was one year later no [15:27] [15:27] something like that 2006 and these are [15:30] [15:30] the old examples the oldest from them [15:33] [15:33] many accelerators appeared as you said [15:36] [15:36] and but I think none of them are still [15:39] [15:39] or have enough track record today to say [15:42] [15:42] that they are profitable business models [15:44] [15:44] even Y Combinator so to say they are [15:48] [15:48] profitable you have to set and expect an [15:50] [15:50] expectation at some point and you have [15:53] [15:53] to fit this expectation but Y Combinator [15:55] [15:55] grow so big that they get increasing [15:58] [15:58] their expectation so now they even [16:01] [16:01] expect to be way more weak and they are [16:04] [16:04] getting the best deal flow in the world [16:05] [16:05] so when it's an accelerator well when [16:08] [16:08] can we call an accelerator a sustainable [16:11] [16:11] business model or a profitable business [16:13] [16:13] model is it mean does it mean that you [16:15] [16:15] have a source for investment that keeps [16:18] [16:18] coming or or whatever you mean to your [16:21] [16:21] uncle for example or a sustainable model [16:24] [16:24] is something that you can keep in the [16:25] [16:25] time right something that you can keep [16:27] [16:27] doing for a lot of time sure and I think [16:29] [16:29] all these models are clearly sustainable [16:32] [16:32] because they have been in the market for [16:33] [16:33] a lot of period of time don't thing [16:35] [16:35] about that the model is only to make [16:37] [16:37] money with the equity in the companies [16:39] [16:39] they are also making money with the [16:40] [16:40] corporations and [16:42] [16:42] but I think the the the best way to look [16:45] [16:45] at that I mean these guys have been in [16:46] [16:46] the market for a long time all the guys [16:48] [16:48] are not longer in the market so there [16:51] [16:51] are guys that are sustainable the guys [16:52] [16:52] are not sustainable [16:54] [16:54] and we're talking about all these guys [16:57] [16:57] in the market it's a big group nearly [16:59] [16:59] 2,000 accelerators yeah you're trying to [17:02] [17:02] get the best talent to startup bootcamp [17:04] [17:04] every year or every a for every program [17:06] [17:06] doesn't it make it harder for you guys [17:09] [17:09] to attract the best companies when [17:11] [17:11] you're competing with suddenly thousands [17:13] [17:13] of other people around around the world [17:15] [17:15] what does it is make [17:17] [17:17] it's it's becoming a very crowded space [17:21] [17:21] it's true I mean only in our last call [17:24] [17:24] this year we analyzed something like a [17:26] [17:26] hundred 50 startups [17:28] [17:28] in the IOT and data space only domain I [17:32] [17:32] mean it's a significant number of [17:34] [17:34] startups of course out of the 850 we [17:37] [17:37] easily find that half of these probably [17:39] [17:39] is not are not fitting in what we are [17:42] [17:42] looking for but I think that this year [17:44] [17:44] we spoke and we change information with [17:47] [17:47] around 350 400 startups from a lot of [17:51] [17:51] countries all around the wall [17:53] [17:53] then we nail down the database and we [17:56] [17:56] try to so the point is that [17:58] [17:58] the space is so crowded as I said before [18:01] [18:01] and sometimes for entrepreneurs so [18:03] [18:03] difficult to understand which is the [18:05] [18:05] right choice for me right I mean in some [18:07] [18:07] times they are much more focused in [18:09] [18:09] trying to understand how much money [18:10] [18:10] these guys are going to offer to me any [18:12] [18:13] change of how much equity right not [18:16] [18:16] paying attention in order to understand [18:17] [18:17] what they can get from the program right [18:21] [18:21] the reality is that becoming more and [18:25] [18:25] more difficult to attractive [18:28] [18:28] especially there are locations are very [18:30] [18:30] crowd like London or Berlin to move [18:33] [18:33] teams and waved on these kind of [18:35] [18:35] locations it's very difficult [18:38] [18:38] but at the end eme were provided the [18:40] [18:40] point is that you have to devote much [18:43] [18:43] more efforts I mean you have to put many [18:45] [18:45] more resources this year we have like [18:48] [18:48] 780 sculptors working for four months [18:50] [18:50] trying to find the best things because [18:53] [18:53] you have to get in contact with these [18:54] [18:54] teams there are in Poland or in Russia [18:57] [18:57] and you have to explain then the value [18:59] [18:59] that you can provide to them because [19:01] [19:01] it's for them as I said before it's very [19:03] [19:03] difficult you take a look to the website [19:04] [19:04] of Loretta Sullivan looks at same thing [19:06] [19:06] so but this is a very economical deal [19:09] [19:09] for us right I mean it's well but it's [19:11] [19:11] not about this I mean it's about all the [19:13] [19:13] things I mean where are the resources [19:14] [19:14] that you are gonna get which about the [19:16] [19:16] program what you're gonna do during the [19:17] [19:17] 90 days who are the guys that are [19:19] [19:19] involved in the simulator with your [19:20] [19:20] background so all the things to share [19:22] [19:22] with these themes but it's an effort [19:24] [19:24] that you have to do in order to be able [19:27] [19:27] to share with these guys and help them [19:29] [19:29] to take a decision and this this again [19:32] [19:32] does something with the business model [19:33] [19:33] as well you know when you can't find [19:35] [19:35] enough great companies to enter your [19:37] [19:37] accelerator and the oil companies are [19:39] [19:39] just divided all over Europe [19:42] [19:42] how will this evolve you know in the [19:44] [19:44] next years if two gets it gets harder [19:46] [19:46] and harder and harder to attract good [19:48] [19:48] companies how will what do you think [19:50] [19:50] Patrizio well [19:52] [19:52] if you look at what we do really we are [19:55] [19:55] reactive in terms of intellect amid self [19:59] [19:59] we are reactive if we find a team that [20:01] [20:01] we feel it's the right team and they [20:03] [20:03] have the right product then we invest [20:05] [20:05] resources but as Bernardo say we don't [20:08] [20:08] have a specific number of startup that [20:12] [20:12] we are looking forward to [20:13] [20:13] accelerate or incubate each year so we [20:18] [20:18] are open to find an opportunity and then [20:21] [20:21] invest on that opportunity on the other [20:24] [20:24] hand since that is a reactive strategy [20:28] [20:28] then we decided to come up with a [20:30] [20:30] venture wielder because that's a [20:32] [20:32] deliberate strategy for us so there we [20:35] [20:35] don't wait for capturing talent or [20:38] [20:38] acquire in Thailand we just go behind a [20:41] [20:41] company or create in a company that we [20:43] [20:43] will live in because we see that the [20:45] [20:45] trend is correct the technology is the [20:47] [20:47] right time to invest technology etcetera [20:49] [20:49] etcetera so in that regard we are not [20:51] [20:51] waiting for we're not scouting to find [20:55] [20:55] the right talent with the right idea [20:57] [20:57] which is a more difficult thing to find [21:00] [21:00] I mean we are first developing idea then [21:03] [21:03] we are finding the talent but if you [21:05] [21:05] want to find both all together that's [21:08] [21:08] what it's becoming more and more [21:10] [21:10] difficult so what we do is we bring [21:13] [21:13] together both and we are very good and [21:15] [21:15] we can be very good we live and we are [21:18] [21:18] doing some some progress in that we are [21:20] [21:20] creating the opportunity finding the [21:23] [21:23] talent it's a different thing we think [21:25] [21:25] we can do it as well but if we do this [21:28] [21:28] in a separated way we think we can be [21:31] [21:31] more successful and it's going to be for [21:33] [21:33] us easier to deliver a sustainable [21:37] [21:37] business model in time right [21:39] [21:39] you're not scouting scouting at all for [21:42] [21:42] companies anymore how are you picking [21:45] [21:45] because I venture builder like how are [21:48] [21:48] you picking your projects how are you [21:49] [21:49] getting in touch with entrepreneurs [21:51] [21:52] so we don't get in touch with inter we [21:56] [21:56] used to do it in the past and we devoted [21:58] [21:58] a lot of resources to listen to projects [22:01] [22:01] and to meeting enterpreneurs and that's [22:05] [22:05] a full-time job and it gets it requires [22:08] [22:08] a lot of reserve time and it's one of [22:10] [22:10] the most important parts of any [22:11] [22:11] accelerator because it's were you get in [22:14] [22:14] contact with your deal flow and where [22:17] [22:17] you can select well and an accelerator [22:20] [22:20] it's all about tilt flow and selecting [22:22] [22:22] so [22:24] [22:24] it's a very important part so we don't [22:27] [22:27] we're no longer an accelerator so we [22:29] [22:29] don't don't devote resources to to [22:32] [22:32] screen projects or see enterpreneurs [22:34] [22:34] anymore so what we do is we spend some [22:38] [22:38] time investigating markets and we do we [22:42] [22:42] plan with the business plans with your [22:43] [22:43] experiments on exit which is very easy [22:45] [22:45] and and then we study we're continuously [22:50] [22:50] connected and studying the opportunities [22:52] [22:52] around the world without raising money [22:54] [22:54] that are trendy for some reason and we [22:58] [22:58] try to extrapolate it in other markets [23:00] [23:00] so that's where we are spending our [23:03] [23:03] resources right now we are analyzing [23:05] [23:05] market and of course from evening and [23:08] [23:08] what we're trying to do is we're trying [23:11] [23:11] to attract talent but not talent of [23:13] [23:13] interpreters a ton of people who can do [23:17] [23:17] things so we love techie people we love [23:20] [23:20] developers we love marketers we think [23:24] [23:24] that's a hard thing the hard thing is to [23:26] [23:26] be able to do things by yourself and [23:29] [23:29] then anyone can become an entrepreneur [23:31] [23:31] one day so the idea is not a hard thing [23:34] [23:34] but finding people that can actually do [23:36] [23:36] it exactly so so so we're not focusing [23:38] [23:38] anymore on the idea at all so we don't [23:41] [23:41] want ideas we don't want projects we [23:43] [23:43] don't want Beach no and we want people [23:47] [23:47] that it's interesting that they can do [23:48] [23:48] things and we are analyzing the markets [23:52] [23:52] because there are so many opportunities [23:53] [23:53] out there so at some point we try to mix [23:56] [23:56] them together and [23:59] [23:59] Anthony's is very important not only for [24:02] [24:02] accellerate or benji builder and any [24:04] [24:04] kind of player that we want to help to [24:08] [24:08] set up [24:10] [24:10] business from intrapreneurs with [24:12] [24:12] startups to have a pretty good [24:14] [24:14] understanding of the market I mean is we [24:16] [24:16] are in a very dynamic market things are [24:18] [24:18] changing so fast [24:20] [24:20] so have good understanding and devote a [24:23] [24:23] lot of resources a lot of time in trying [24:25] [24:25] to understand what's next why this is [24:29] [24:29] next is really relevant and at the end [24:32] [24:32] of the day we also need excellent people [24:35] [24:35] in order to execute these kind of things [24:36] [24:36] but it's very important to understand [24:38] [24:38] the space or the domain that you want to [24:41] [24:41] play exactly then when you deploy [24:43] [24:43] started from from sort of bootcamp after [24:46] [24:46] like a finished program [24:49] [24:49] do you look at it you know three months [24:51] [24:51] happy or a year after and say this was a [24:53] [24:53] success this was a success acceleration [24:56] [24:56] or do you have to wait until you see an [24:58] [24:58] exit or an extras acquisition or well a [25:01] [25:01] deep at the end is ready with the [25:03] [25:03] startups depends how you measure success [25:05] [25:05] right that could be most of the people [25:08] [25:08] used to say how much money does it start [25:10] [25:10] to raise and we have pretty good numbers [25:11] [25:11] you can go to our website or [25:13] [25:13] how many customers or how successful the [25:16] [25:16] company from the sales point of view [25:19] [25:19] for me that is another [25:21] [25:21] great or another number that is very [25:24] [25:24] good is how many of the starters that [25:27] [25:27] have gone through our programs after X [25:30] [25:30] many years are still alive [25:33] [25:33] and we have a number that are in our [25:36] [25:36] website that eighteen right now is 82 [25:38] [25:38] percent of the 350 or whatever startups [25:42] [25:42] that have gone through our programs our [25:44] [25:44] life it's an average but after seven [25:47] [25:47] eight years there is a big number of [25:49] [25:49] starters that are alive and and I think [25:52] [25:52] that this is a combination of a lot of [25:54] [25:54] things probably number one is is the [25:56] [25:56] selection with Julia I mean we spend a [25:58] [25:58] lot of resources in trying to bring the [26:00] [26:00] best guys mainly the best guys [26:03] [26:03] number two is the program I mean our [26:07] [26:07] program has been growing I mean we have [26:09] [26:09] been learning when you are doing this [26:11] [26:11] for a lot of years you understand the [26:13] [26:13] things that we have to do and the things [26:14] [26:14] that you don't have to right but the [26:16] [26:16] main goal for our paren is to really [26:17] [26:17] help these startups early stages start [26:20] [26:20] after they already have some product or [26:21] [26:21] maybe some initial traction this is what [26:24] [26:24] we are looking for to really find the [26:26] [26:26] product feet on the market feet what we [26:28] [26:28] are trying to do most of the starters [26:30] [26:30] they fail because they are not able to [26:32] [26:32] find the product via the market fit [26:34] [26:34] right then they then they have a lot of [26:37] [26:37] friction in order to get sales or [26:39] [26:39] revenues or users so [26:42] [26:42] friction no significant traction so no [26:45] [26:45] investor trust you because you don't [26:47] [26:47] have significant traction and then good [26:49] [26:49] game over okay so our main goal during [26:51] [26:51] the program that's why I use a word [26:53] [26:53] processor or a structure but also our [26:54] [26:54] big network of contacts is to help these [26:57] [26:57] guys to move your assumptions to a real [27:00] [27:00] product feed market feed company and [27:04] [27:04] because at the end of the day you [27:06] [27:06] wouldn't start up I mean you have your [27:07] [27:07] network you are your co-founders your [27:11] [27:11] network of 10 15 people around you and [27:13] [27:13] you are trying to base the in basing the [27:16] [27:16] assumptions or what you believe what you [27:18] [27:18] think and the people around you that [27:20] [27:20] unfortunately is not you know right [27:22] [27:22] because you're trying to build something [27:23] [27:23] that pretend to be disruptive or pretend [27:26] [27:26] to captured a big portion of the market [27:28] [27:28] well the likelihood that you and your [27:31] [27:31] small group is going to be able to do [27:33] [27:33] the so is a chance so we we put then in [27:37] [27:37] our process we allow them to have [27:39] [27:39] contact with a lot of people with [27:40] [27:40] paraphilias people in order to validate [27:42] [27:42] all these assumptions and do this Lean [27:45] [27:45] Startup and test and to iterate and to [27:47] [27:47] change a lot of things in order to by [27:49] [27:49] the end of the program [27:51] [27:51] hopefully having then much more close to [27:53] [27:53] the bottom feeder market because you [27:55] [27:55] have a much better for the feeder market [27:57] [27:57] feed well you might be kind of super [28:00] [28:00] great company or not but the chances on [28:03] [28:03] the likelihood to be to stay in the [28:05] [28:05] market it's gonna be much more high yeah [28:07] [28:07] and Barcelona as a city we're all in [28:10] [28:10] Barcelona we're all operating from [28:11] [28:11] Barcelona a city that's growing very [28:14] [28:14] rapidly in terms of startups innovation [28:16] [28:16] and also accelerators incubators and [28:19] [28:19] venture builders but not what do you [28:21] [28:21] think is it a good thing for a city in [28:24] [28:24] itself to have a lot of these players [28:27] [28:27] active when I talk to people at events [28:30] [28:30] and around the city people saying oh I [28:33] [28:33] didn't know it was so many accelerators [28:34] [28:34] here like this is a very positive thing [28:36] [28:36] but for the accelerators itself probably [28:39] [28:39] you would want to be the only one that's [28:41] [28:41] here right so what what do you think do [28:43] [28:43] you think it's it's a good thing or I do [28:46] [28:46] think it's a good thing for society in [28:49] [28:49] general and for for enterpreneurs of [28:51] [28:51] course they have bigger choice so I [28:54] [28:54] think it's good that there are 2,000 [28:55] [28:55] accelerators and and if there were [28:57] [28:57] 20,000 it would be better [28:59] [28:59] another thing is that [29:02] [29:02] accelerators are sustainable and [29:04] [29:04] profitable business models that's [29:05] [29:05] another separate issue but I think it's [29:07] [29:07] very good that we give resources to [29:10] [29:10] people that is thinking on starting an [29:13] [29:13] idea and they have no clue whatsoever [29:15] [29:15] where to start from and so any kind of [29:18] [29:18] help you can give to these people at [29:20] [29:20] these stages it it helps a lot [29:24] [29:24] yeah [29:27] [29:27] you you are moving more out over to the [29:30] [29:30] boutique kind of doing an acceleration [29:32] [29:32] or as a venture Bueller as you call it [29:34] [29:34] and all the accelerators are basically [29:37] [29:37] they have different type of programs but [29:40] [29:40] they look kind of similar from from the [29:42] [29:42] outside do you think more accelerators [29:45] [29:45] will you know evolve into this venture a [29:47] [29:47] builder thing or how do you see in the [29:49] [29:49] next five years [29:51] [29:51] well it's funny because you have here [29:53] [29:53] two different two different people that [29:57] [29:57] started in sort of different ways but I [30:00] [30:00] think we are both going to the same [30:02] [30:02] model but not on myself on there Hannah [30:06] [30:06] hell started up with a different model [30:08] [30:08] but with a better branding and better [30:11] [30:11] well-known company all over Europe so [30:14] [30:14] and and he's very niche oriented very [30:16] [30:16] vertically oriented so I think those are [30:19] [30:19] the two models are will probably prevail [30:21] [30:21] I don't think there is the traditional [30:26] [30:26] accelerators that just bring mentors [30:29] [30:29] into the companies I don't think that [30:31] [30:31] could be sustainable over time unless [30:34] [30:34] there are migrating towards helping [30:37] [30:37] companies develop their own [30:40] [30:40] in in company [30:43] [30:43] programs which is for example what what [30:46] [30:46] connector is doing I think that would [30:48] [30:48] help a lot with sustainability for for [30:51] [30:51] them but I think in the end in my [30:55] [30:55] perspective is that the best model for [30:58] [30:58] some type of people for example in our [31:01] [31:01] case or a case of permit is the company [31:04] [31:04] wheeler I mean we feel more comfortable [31:07] [31:07] with that model we believe that we can [31:10] [31:10] create a lot of value with that model [31:12] [31:12] and well our progress so far is [31:16] [31:16] make me make me think that we are on [31:19] [31:19] there on the right track right and [31:22] [31:22] there's always a lot of developers and [31:24] [31:24] entrepreneurs watching and listening to [31:27] [31:27] this podcast and I'm he'll do people [31:30] [31:30] that are thinking should I enter an [31:32] [31:32] accelerator is this the right choice to [31:34] [31:34] me in your opinion what kind of startup [31:37] [31:37] what what do you need to have to apply [31:41] [31:41] for an accelerator what do you think [31:44] [31:44] well as we said before I mean there are [31:46] [31:46] different types of a Cerritos I think [31:48] [31:48] the first thing I will I will tell the [31:51] [31:51] entrepreneurs is to do the homework I [31:53] [31:53] mean to understand the stage that they [31:55] [31:55] are right now to understand any [31:58] [31:58] accelerator what they are looking for [32:00] [32:00] their oscillators or incubators that [32:02] [32:02] they are targeting pre acceleration [32:03] [32:03] companies or pre idea or idea state so [32:07] [32:07] there are different states at these [32:09] [32:09] early days of the companies they have to [32:12] [32:12] understand what they are in because [32:14] [32:14] different accelerators are targeting to [32:16] [32:16] different kind of teams or the different [32:18] [32:18] kind of companies so the first thing is [32:20] [32:20] to do your homework try to understand [32:23] [32:23] which are the cell raters incubators or [32:26] [32:26] venture builders that are really fitting [32:28] [32:28] in what you are right now second thing [32:31] [32:31] is trying to understand how these guys [32:32] [32:32] are going to help me I mean it's to [32:34] [32:34] really the same way that the when you [32:36] [32:36] are trying to raise money you try to [32:38] [32:38] understand more and more the investors [32:40] [32:40] do the same thing with the cell rate or [32:41] [32:41] try to understand who are the guys [32:43] [32:43] behind rado behind incubator behind the [32:45] [32:45] venture builder what's your bag down how [32:47] [32:47] are you planning to help me be very soft [32:49] [32:49] stick with that because it's some kind [32:51] [32:51] of Mario's most of these relationship [32:54] [32:54] ends with an equity a change so it's [32:55] [32:55] going to be your partner it's not going [32:57] [32:57] to be for the next three months it's [32:58] [32:58] gonna be forever so do your homework and [33:01] [33:01] and to be honest I mean the teams are [33:03] [33:03] much more successful where the teams are [33:05] [33:05] were much more demanding at the [33:07] [33:07] beginning right being very why you're [33:10] [33:10] gonna help me what are the things that [33:11] [33:11] you're gonna me can't you this kind of [33:13] [33:13] list of things is something that you [33:15] [33:15] believe that we can achieve within the [33:16] [33:16] program trying to understand what are [33:18] [33:18] the outcomes of the program it's not yes [33:20] [33:20] go to website apply online I mean try to [33:23] [33:23] have these one on one interviews and in [33:26] [33:26] my experience the best things are the [33:28] [33:28] ones are much more demanding trying to [33:30] [33:30] understand what are gonna be the outcome [33:31] [33:31] of the stellarator [33:33] [33:33] and is there any like misconceptions of [33:36] [33:36] startups applying that they're thinking [33:40] [33:40] that you can can give them something [33:41] [33:41] that you can't give them there are a lot [33:43] [33:43] of misconceptions and I think this is [33:45] [33:45] one of the issues of the of the [33:48] [33:48] accelerators I mean I agree with Bernard [33:51] [33:51] saying that as much as we can it's going [33:53] [33:53] to be great it's as far as all of them [33:56] [33:56] can deliver enough quality value because [33:59] [33:59] this is at the installation that is not [34:01] [34:01] a clear definition right Nessa said [34:03] [34:03] before I mean most entrepreneurs are [34:04] [34:04] confused what doesn't mean I mean it's [34:06] [34:06] gonna be a table and one mentor coming [34:09] [34:09] two days a week or whatever is gonna be [34:12] [34:12] like we do 30 workshops 15 people really [34:16] [34:16] helping me every day plus 80 mentor [34:20] [34:20] whatever so it's not clear so I mean [34:23] [34:23] it's good to have a lot of a straight or [34:24] [34:24] Sieben in Barcelona as far as most of [34:27] [34:27] think and deliver enough level of [34:29] [34:29] quality because if not intrapreneurs are [34:31] [34:31] joining this straight to the may be is [34:33] [34:33] not delivering enough level of quality [34:34] [34:34] and there is a bad feeling right and [34:38] [34:38] this is then affecting the others that [34:40] [34:40] we are trying to do in a proper way [34:42] [34:42] right right [34:45] [34:45] we are not talking about model here that [34:48] [34:48] is a pre accelerator which is what start [34:52] [34:52] narrator is something where [34:55] [34:55] entrepreneurs can come and come be there [34:58] [34:58] for at least six weeks can have an [35:02] [35:02] exposition to Mentors but we are not [35:04] [35:04] requiring any equity from them or any [35:07] [35:07] kind of payment in any kind of mining [35:10] [35:10] right so basically we are just giving to [35:12] [35:12] that yeah so that's how good thing for [35:15] [35:15] them I mean for entrepreneurs in order [35:17] [35:17] to for the less experienced people to [35:21] [35:21] take and to have a first feeling of what [35:24] [35:24] it is to win in an accelerator so I [35:28] [35:28] think this kind of program is also a [35:30] [35:30] good thing for people with without [35:33] [35:33] experience but if you have [35:36] [35:36] some more experience and you've been [35:39] [35:39] already into a pre accelerator or some [35:42] [35:42] other experience which could help then [35:45] [35:45] it's a matter of finding out exactly [35:47] [35:47] what is that you are going to be given [35:50] [35:50] from that program in particular and see [35:53] [35:53] if it really matches what you really [35:55] [35:55] need and you have some success stories [35:58] [35:58] as well like also like it it Megan and [36:01] [36:01] startup bootcamp [36:03] [36:03] what are like the factors within these [36:06] [36:06] companies that that you call them [36:08] [36:08] success stories [36:09] [36:09] well it depends also [36:12] [36:12] it begins by the entrepreneur by the [36:15] [36:15] entrepreneurial team I think it's one of [36:17] [36:17] the most important elements the other [36:19] [36:19] element is the the sector in which they [36:22] [36:22] are in and the time in which they got [36:24] [36:24] into that into that sector we have a [36:27] [36:27] very good experience in e-commerce there [36:29] [36:29] was a company that was astir have five [36:32] [36:32] years ago and we have a also very bad [36:36] [36:36] story on another ecommerce company that [36:39] [36:39] started like [36:41] [36:41] two years or three years ago so the [36:44] [36:44] thing is three years ago for a fashion [36:47] [36:47] equivalence for example was too late and [36:49] [36:49] there was a that thing was very rude but [36:52] [36:52] the opportunity we probably wasn't there [36:54] [36:54] anymore because solando was already [36:56] [36:56] there with a huge investment and asus [37:00] [37:00] was already the UK so it wasn't anymore [37:03] [37:03] an opportunity despite the team was I [37:06] [37:06] would team deliver you know what they [37:08] [37:08] had to deliver so I guess if you take a [37:12] [37:12] look at those two issues you probably [37:14] [37:14] have fifty percent of the issues you [37:17] [37:17] need to take a look already there then [37:20] [37:20] there are other other issues like for [37:23] [37:23] example the [37:24] [37:24] capability of the team to get investment [37:26] [37:26] which is obviously something very very [37:29] [37:29] important as well but I would say those [37:32] [37:32] three issues are probably the most [37:34] [37:34] important ones in my case [37:36] [37:36] it is clear everybody is saying in all [37:39] [37:39] levels of the chain right intrapreneur [37:42] [37:42] is the most important thing right but I [37:44] [37:44] think it's much more important in this [37:46] [37:46] kind of [37:47] [37:47] vehicles we're talking about when you [37:50] [37:50] build the roster orators to have someone [37:54] [37:54] open-minded I mean flexible and with the [37:58] [37:58] ability to listen the ability to because [38:01] [38:01] his cell rate or some bunch of business [38:04] [38:04] all about that I mean this is that is [38:05] [38:05] now initial business plan that is going [38:08] [38:08] to be made so the things are gonna [38:10] [38:10] change so and things are going to change [38:12] [38:12] much better if you are listening and you [38:14] [38:14] are learning from what you are getting [38:15] [38:15] so [38:17] [38:17] you ask him be forming with it what you [38:19] [38:19] have to look at the decelerator or a [38:21] [38:21] venture builder when you are looking for [38:23] [38:23] I also mean they also have to take a [38:25] [38:25] look inside and so if they are ready to [38:29] [38:29] really go through this kind of process [38:31] [38:31] because I mean is there are people I you [38:33] [38:33] know listening I mean these people are [38:35] [38:35] saying I'm listening you but they are [38:36] [38:36] not listening me right and it's not that [38:39] [38:39] we have to take your decision but you [38:40] [38:40] have to be open-minded [38:42] [38:42] open to change flexible those are very [38:47] [38:47] important skills that you should have if [38:50] [38:50] you want to be part of one of one of [38:52] [38:52] these companies of process right and how [38:56] [38:56] is it for you to because but not said [38:58] [38:59] that we are interested in getting talent [39:00] [39:00] like developers marketers the best ones [39:02] [39:02] but but you usually start with my idea [39:04] [39:04] right you usually start with the [39:06] [39:06] entrepreneur when you take people in how [39:08] [39:08] do you [39:09] [39:09] I make sure that they have the right [39:12] [39:12] kind of talent already inside the team [39:14] [39:14] all it's a combination of a lot of [39:17] [39:17] things and something that you developed [39:18] [39:18] from time to time to really understand [39:22] [39:22] yes for you to put an example during our [39:24] [39:24] selection process I mean as I said [39:27] [39:27] before I mean we start with a big thing [39:28] [39:28] a big database and we nail down and at [39:31] [39:31] the end we finish with inviting 20 teams [39:34] [39:34] to parcel enough to stay for the week [39:36] [39:36] with us from this year we have 20 teams [39:39] [39:39] fronting was 12 different countries [39:41] [39:41] Australia Hindi and so on so with these [39:44] [39:44] two days we do a lot of things for [39:46] [39:46] instance one of the things that we do is [39:47] [39:47] to have some psychologist [39:49] [39:49] interview in these these people I mean [39:52] [39:52] is what something that we learn from [39:54] [39:54] this period is trying to understand if [39:56] [39:56] because someone could be a good [39:58] [39:58] entrepreneur but at the end we need a [39:59] [39:59] team is that in gonna be able to work [40:01] [40:01] together well it's another layer of [40:03] [40:03] information in order to validate this [40:05] [40:05] make sense or not [40:07] [40:07] right and but not [40:10] [40:10] for many when I speak people venture [40:13] [40:13] builder is something a bit cryptic it's [40:15] [40:15] a bit new and a venture builder it's not [40:18] [40:18] given that everybody knows what that is [40:20] [40:20] right away but we just started a new [40:23] [40:23] company at evening is called factorial [40:26] [40:26] can you tell us a bit the process I [40:29] [40:29] guess this is a process that you haven't [40:31] [40:31] done yet but like how do you plan to [40:34] [40:34] help this company within it Nick how do [40:35] [40:35] you plan to support a new company [40:38] [40:38] because it's a bit special we start [40:40] [40:40] something right now so you say Ben to [40:43] [40:43] build it is cryptic it's because we give [40:45] [40:45] fancy names to things yeah it used to be [40:48] [40:48] a group of companies right it's a growth [40:50] [40:50] companies and [40:52] [40:53] so how do how does it work it doesn't [40:56] [40:56] have a fixed way to work and that's why [40:58] [40:58] we don't have a program or you know and [41:00] [41:00] so we try to look for talent [41:02] [41:02] continuously to work in our startups and [41:05] [41:05] we do events with the workshops with our [41:08] [41:08] kind of stuff like other accelerators [41:10] [41:10] would do and but our goal is to find [41:13] [41:13] talent to work in our startups and then [41:16] [41:16] since we start the relationship with [41:19] [41:19] these people [41:20] [41:20] a professional relationship in in in all [41:23] [41:23] of our startups we start understanding [41:26] [41:26] how do they perform and how do they work [41:29] [41:29] in marketing in development whatever and [41:33] [41:33] then when once we know these people we [41:35] [41:35] know how to perform we know how do they [41:38] [41:38] work in their teams then we are in a [41:40] [41:40] better position and to think of [41:43] [41:43] investing on those people so that's your [41:45] [41:45] final or final stats through [41:48] [41:48] professional relationship we work [41:51] [41:51] together and then we consider why don't [41:54] [41:54] we start a company together so it's the [41:57] [41:57] opposite way right so we try to look for [41:59] [41:59] performance people who [42:01] [42:01] do worse you know and then we at the [42:06] [42:06] same time we analyze markets and we come [42:08] [42:08] up with ideas and we have limited [42:10] [42:10] resources we cannot be starting [42:12] [42:12] everything in the world like maybe [42:14] [42:14] drugget internet - no hmm so we try to [42:18] [42:18] the boat or small resources to the [42:21] [42:21] biggest opportunities we find and that's [42:24] [42:24] how it works we also get in contact with [42:27] [42:27] our with a network of investors that [42:29] [42:29] that are very related to - to what we do [42:33] [42:33] and they invested a cleaner companies so [42:36] [42:36] we never we never wanted to raise money [42:40] [42:40] in it Nick so we would have a problem a [42:44] [42:44] conflict of interest because then we [42:45] [42:45] would have to accept projects and look [42:48] [42:48] for projects and and we would have to [42:51] [42:51] enter projects in a certain amount of [42:53] [42:53] time so we try our investors - we tell [42:58] [42:58] our investors to invest directly in our [42:59] [42:59] companies and we are focused solely [43:02] [43:02] completely on growing our companies and [43:06] [43:06] and growing or companies as a business [43:08] [43:08] because that's you talked before about [43:10] [43:10] misconceptions I think one of the [43:12] [43:12] biggest misconceptions is that getting [43:14] [43:14] funded is growing your business and this [43:17] [43:17] happens a lot with mental builder and an [43:20] [43:20] accelerator so we have a sort of a [43:22] [43:22] conflict of interest here because and we [43:25] [43:25] think that our business model ultimately [43:29] [43:29] is is exiting companies and having two [43:32] [43:32] turns and equity so and we push [43:36] [43:36] sometimes companies to get funded two [43:39] [43:39] three value and to get revalued and [43:43] [43:43] raise the value of the company and then [43:46] [43:46] or returns an equity are bigger but for [43:49] [43:49] business to make sense I [43:51] [43:51] the purpose is to grow as a business so [43:55] [43:55] to make the business sustainable but [43:58] [43:58] also scalable and and that should be the [44:00] [44:00] ultimate goal not finding and over [44:03] [44:03] funding and over funding which is what [44:06] [44:06] is happening and sometimes and it [44:08] [44:08] creates sort of small bubbles in [44:09] [44:09] different sectors so I think that the [44:12] [44:12] purpose of a business is to grow with as [44:14] [44:14] little resources as possible and with as [44:16] [44:16] little dilution as possible [44:19] [44:19] great that was everything we had time [44:22] [44:22] for unfortunately [44:24] [44:24] forty-five minutes go by fast but let's [44:27] [44:27] stay tuned for our next podcast in in [44:29] [44:29] December remember that you can catch the [44:32] [44:32] highlights from from this podcast in [44:33] [44:33] video form on on ethnic blog and or on [44:35] [44:35] our Facebook and everywhere we are [44:37] [44:37] online thank you again uh elevation but [44:41] [44:41] not for coming I really appreciate [44:42] [44:42] taking your time you are all very busy [44:44] [44:44] so I really appreciate it and my name is [44:47] [44:47] Sandra oblong and I remember to follow [44:49] [44:49] ethnic for for more quality tech [44:51] [44:51] discussions also in the future [44:53] [44:53] [Music]
Transcripción completa
[Music] welcome to the ethnic podcast and my name is Sandra Holland today we will discuss the differences between startup accelerators incubators and venture builders if they work for startups and if so what's the success factors and we're super lucky to have with us some great people we had angle Garcia director of startup bootcamp IOT data and cybersecurity was a Patricio Hunt managing partner of intellectual and also the ethnic president Pernod Ferraro welcome to you all thank you be here so to start off with young he'll you've been involved with startup bootcamp for a while now couple years you also invested in a couple of the projects yourself what is it that you find so interesting with with this type of program compared to just regular seed funding well I finished our different things I mean city funded our cellar a toes and incubators there are a lot of animals probably we're going to discuss it in the during the podcasts are completely different things Anthony's a serratus are to some extent trying to prepare these teams sometimes even don't even companies these teams to be some kind of investable company or an investable startup right so we are early I think in the in the process of the funding so I don't think that we have to compare such investment with celery toes or a complete different animals the things that we are looking for our different I'm probably something that we're going to discuss today right right what are you finding appealing with with these kind of programs what what are the big pros for you well as a personal level accelerator is something that you are really much more deep into the people I mean it's a lot about the personal relationship I mean really helping in a day to day basis to these guys son invested I mean you take some distance right them is much more a financial investment it's also a financial investment foreign selector but these are other much more personal factors I mean you mean you're gonna really try to help these guys to make the dream a reality right this is you are going to the personal level so it's something much more much more personal that when you are I get an investor then you start to have your legal implications and your financial rules and this kind of thing so you're moving to a different level I think that both elements are necessary in an ecosystem but are doing different things and act in a different stage and petitio you have a different approach more than like a traditional accelerator with a six month program right tell us a little bit about your approach to startups and how startups approach you well we have different models actually because we running the tech stars startup next program which is a traditional program or you have a selection process in the beginning applicants that are interested in in getting in etc and that's a batch process and we do it twice a year and then we have our let's say our own boutique accelerator which is Internet tube and there we do whatever we think is best for our company and depends a lot in the context of the company the team the stage of the company our interest in the company as well so we do a very different thing there we usually do one or two companies every year only that we really do a let's say we do a custom fit program and we just concentrate on what the team really needs and it's a very different approach so why did you choose this approach instead of as you are affiliated with the tech stars the more traditional program what did you choose to do this kind of thing basically we are doing things us as we see there require in the rhythm is not something that we have a device in a very specific way we are always sort of innovating on the periphery of the of things and we are looking finding exactly what are the best opportunities that we have there and we go behind those opportunities at the same time for example last year we founded a mobile venture builder because we thought there was a perhaps a more interesting model for us and it was probably a model that was better for our skills so now we are very focused on that program as well and we are doing things as they are coming to us and taking opportunities mostly rather than how very let's say focus strategy based on exactly things that we think are that we have to do I mean we're more open to innovation rather than designing what we want to exactly and talking about venture builders but not you used to be ethnic used to be a very traditional accelerator used to call it the hacker accelerator once but but it changed a bit the last time can you tell us about what has to change and when you speak to people now what do you call it Nick hmm so we never meant to be a traditional accelerator so that's why we call it the hacker accelerator but basically what we did what we did in our short span of life is experimenting so we tried different models and we experimented and we reached to the conclusion that a fixed program with a set of mentors with a certain amount of resources devoted to each project and with the need of having to do n number of projects every n number of time was not possible for us we studied the mother we analyzed it and we realized that it was not possible at least for us and so we decided to move away from this model and and start companies and commit about committing the companies that we were growing so increasing our participation and our effort in smaller companies instead of doing a model based on quantity time statistics so we we tried to focus on smaller projects on a small number of projects and then commit on these projects forever not just for a period of time but making sure that if we are something and we take something out of this project it will be along with the other enterpreneurs that are that are doing it so we we take big bigger stakes in the companies that we work and we take full responsibility we don't look for winners we make them and we make winner teams and winner projects we are continuously striving to find the greatest talent and we take responsibility of funding the projects of of the success of the project in the long term hmm so that's a difference in the mother we then we don't participate in a bad way in a very early stage in a short amount or close amount of time and we take responsibility almost forever in the projects right then okay you have been sorry to campus is one of the more successful accelerators in Europe one would say and but but the business model business model itself as Bernard says they went away from it that was their own choice but but how are you looking at the business model do you find it successful itself or is it too early to say what do you think it's a very good question because the thing that the other day I was speaking well I don't remember what it was but he was talking about the salah laid off right and i did some kind of research about and i find out that what it was at angel is that there are two thousand accelerators in the world which is not true it's not true which is true is the there are 2,000 companies or entities that are claiming to be an accelerator because at the end of the day I mean you take a look to all these two thousand websites and all of the necessary half workshops I have mentors and I'm gonna move you to the next level and blah blah blah blah blah but at the end the reality is that most of them they are starting today and in two years from now and and windier for now they have to rethink about the model because the model is not sustainable yes by definition means you are trying to have some tables and chairs and if you are not don't have enough money in order to deliver enough value so you're trying to make money with the equity that you are taking in these companies but at the same time you have enough resources in order to deliver enough value to these companies well it's trying to do a circle with that square it's gonna be a challenge I think that there are some players out there I'm not saying that we are better or not but we have a different model I mean we have these corporations support in our province and I'm talking not only about to start a boot camp but also techstars of black and play or the guys from Y Combinator of all 500 starters in the US that we have these corporations investing or supporting our programs in order to have access to innovation and that's what makes our business model sustainable I mean there are few solar leaders in the world that they have been in the market for more than six seven years around the ones that are describing and of course that we are changing things internally but we have find out is way a sustainable business model that if you look around is it's not in others always have to rethink about different ways to do it different ways to find sources of finding in order to be able to get money back from this equity stake that's the set before I mean we don't have enough resources to invest in these companies the likelihood to get a lot of money from this equity stake is right so very poor right so we have been doing other things sorcery changing things focusing more and more in the vertical thing right that probably we are going to speak later I mean is one of the futures of accelerators trying to be much more specific in something but again everything that we have this specific business model that allows our to provide or deliver at least more resources and we believe that more value that little players in the market positio you have also been involved with this traditional type of programs but as we talked about like the accelerate accelerate that's all only been around for a couple of years it's a fairly new new thing so when when can we say that accelerator is the success at what time is it too early or is it in the future what do you think I think that like who was saying there are many type of accelerators and you can call accelerators really just a few of them so basically I think those that are focused on verticals will probably be more successful in the long term also the first accelerators the world ones that are more consolidated like Y Combinator tech stars start at bootcamp and a few others probably because they were the first to market and because they have this effect of being able to select the best companies all over the world those are probably going to stand out and going to continue in a success for the rest what you have to do to see if you can find a specific model that may deliver some special value to the companies that you are looking for specifically but should be like a very very let's say focused group of companies and I guess those ones are the ones that are going to prevail right right for us the model let's say in our case we've been going from the hybrid custom-fit sort of program that we deliver we only do that as I said before just for a couple of companies perhaps each year and then we also Bernard was saying we found out these along many years and looking for well whatever the best thing for us to do and finally we came to the conclusion that a company will there was in our case the best thing to to concentrate our deliberate efforts on the other hand as I was saying also you have to remain sort of open to innovate on the periphery so if they come to us a couple of teams every year that we see that they're really good and we can help them we do that I mean we help them in the way that they need and in the way that is better for them to eat we have but our deliberate efforts now are just focus on the company wielder which we see that is the best model for us in order to build companies it's a kind of model perhaps it's more closer to whatever nut is doing we we select further we'll go all the other way I mean we select the space in which we want to innovate we look for a company that would validate our concept then we select the technology we build the technology we get traction in the market and if we get real traction then we'll go and try to find that team that would be able to take this to a success or to a spin-off that could be successful in the long term so this is a completely different model we believe in in our case in particular that this is the best for us to we believe that's the model where we can be more successful and this is why we do that yeah I have a question related to that yes no please please go ahead and I think it's interesting to analyze what we define as sustainable and how sustainable is a goal by itself so is it is it not profitable the goal of any business so shouldn't we create profitable business but still and I would like to understand how an accelerator can be sustainable and and how an accelerator can be profitable on what's a ball and what's the time span needed for that so I think that those are the biggest questions I'd realizes in the world even the first accelerators in 2005 Paula Hammond started Dominator think tech stuff was one year later no something like that 2006 and these are the old examples the oldest from them many accelerators appeared as you said and but I think none of them are still or have enough track record today to say that they are profitable business models even Y Combinator so to say they are profitable you have to set and expect an expectation at some point and you have to fit this expectation but Y Combinator grow so big that they get increasing their expectation so now they even expect to be way more weak and they are getting the best deal flow in the world so when it's an accelerator well when can we call an accelerator a sustainable business model or a profitable business model is it mean does it mean that you have a source for investment that keeps coming or or whatever you mean to your uncle for example or a sustainable model is something that you can keep in the time right something that you can keep doing for a lot of time sure and I think all these models are clearly sustainable because they have been in the market for a lot of period of time don't thing about that the model is only to make money with the equity in the companies they are also making money with the corporations and but I think the the the best way to look at that I mean these guys have been in the market for a long time all the guys are not longer in the market so there are guys that are sustainable the guys are not sustainable and we're talking about all these guys in the market it's a big group nearly 2,000 accelerators yeah you're trying to get the best talent to startup bootcamp every year or every a for every program doesn't it make it harder for you guys to attract the best companies when you're competing with suddenly thousands of other people around around the world what does it is make it's it's becoming a very crowded space it's true I mean only in our last call this year we analyzed something like a hundred 50 startups in the IOT and data space only domain I mean it's a significant number of startups of course out of the 850 we easily find that half of these probably is not are not fitting in what we are looking for but I think that this year we spoke and we change information with around 350 400 startups from a lot of countries all around the wall then we nail down the database and we try to so the point is that the space is so crowded as I said before and sometimes for entrepreneurs so difficult to understand which is the right choice for me right I mean in some times they are much more focused in trying to understand how much money these guys are going to offer to me any change of how much equity right not paying attention in order to understand what they can get from the program right the reality is that becoming more and more difficult to attractive especially there are locations are very crowd like London or Berlin to move teams and waved on these kind of locations it's very difficult but at the end eme were provided the point is that you have to devote much more efforts I mean you have to put many more resources this year we have like 780 sculptors working for four months trying to find the best things because you have to get in contact with these teams there are in Poland or in Russia and you have to explain then the value that you can provide to them because it's for them as I said before it's very difficult you take a look to the website of Loretta Sullivan looks at same thing so but this is a very economical deal for us right I mean it's well but it's not about this I mean it's about all the things I mean where are the resources that you are gonna get which about the program what you're gonna do during the 90 days who are the guys that are involved in the simulator with your background so all the things to share with these themes but it's an effort that you have to do in order to be able to share with these guys and help them to take a decision and this this again does something with the business model as well you know when you can't find enough great companies to enter your accelerator and the oil companies are just divided all over Europe how will this evolve you know in the next years if two gets it gets harder and harder and harder to attract good companies how will what do you think Patrizio well if you look at what we do really we are reactive in terms of intellect amid self we are reactive if we find a team that we feel it's the right team and they have the right product then we invest resources but as Bernardo say we don't have a specific number of startup that we are looking forward to accelerate or incubate each year so we are open to find an opportunity and then invest on that opportunity on the other hand since that is a reactive strategy then we decided to come up with a venture wielder because that's a deliberate strategy for us so there we don't wait for capturing talent or acquire in Thailand we just go behind a company or create in a company that we will live in because we see that the trend is correct the technology is the right time to invest technology etcetera etcetera so in that regard we are not waiting for we're not scouting to find the right talent with the right idea which is a more difficult thing to find I mean we are first developing idea then we are finding the talent but if you want to find both all together that's what it's becoming more and more difficult so what we do is we bring together both and we are very good and we can be very good we live and we are doing some some progress in that we are creating the opportunity finding the talent it's a different thing we think we can do it as well but if we do this in a separated way we think we can be more successful and it's going to be for us easier to deliver a sustainable business model in time right you're not scouting scouting at all for companies anymore how are you picking because I venture builder like how are you picking your projects how are you getting in touch with entrepreneurs so we don't get in touch with inter we used to do it in the past and we devoted a lot of resources to listen to projects and to meeting enterpreneurs and that's a full-time job and it gets it requires a lot of reserve time and it's one of the most important parts of any accelerator because it's were you get in contact with your deal flow and where you can select well and an accelerator it's all about tilt flow and selecting so it's a very important part so we don't we're no longer an accelerator so we don't don't devote resources to to screen projects or see enterpreneurs anymore so what we do is we spend some time investigating markets and we do we plan with the business plans with your experiments on exit which is very easy and and then we study we're continuously connected and studying the opportunities around the world without raising money that are trendy for some reason and we try to extrapolate it in other markets so that's where we are spending our resources right now we are analyzing market and of course from evening and what we're trying to do is we're trying to attract talent but not talent of interpreters a ton of people who can do things so we love techie people we love developers we love marketers we think that's a hard thing the hard thing is to be able to do things by yourself and then anyone can become an entrepreneur one day so the idea is not a hard thing but finding people that can actually do it exactly so so so we're not focusing anymore on the idea at all so we don't want ideas we don't want projects we don't want Beach no and we want people that it's interesting that they can do things and we are analyzing the markets because there are so many opportunities out there so at some point we try to mix them together and Anthony's is very important not only for accellerate or benji builder and any kind of player that we want to help to set up business from intrapreneurs with startups to have a pretty good understanding of the market I mean is we are in a very dynamic market things are changing so fast so have good understanding and devote a lot of resources a lot of time in trying to understand what's next why this is next is really relevant and at the end of the day we also need excellent people in order to execute these kind of things but it's very important to understand the space or the domain that you want to play exactly then when you deploy started from from sort of bootcamp after like a finished program do you look at it you know three months happy or a year after and say this was a success this was a success acceleration or do you have to wait until you see an exit or an extras acquisition or well a deep at the end is ready with the startups depends how you measure success right that could be most of the people used to say how much money does it start to raise and we have pretty good numbers you can go to our website or how many customers or how successful the company from the sales point of view for me that is another great or another number that is very good is how many of the starters that have gone through our programs after X many years are still alive and we have a number that are in our website that eighteen right now is 82 percent of the 350 or whatever startups that have gone through our programs our life it's an average but after seven eight years there is a big number of starters that are alive and and I think that this is a combination of a lot of things probably number one is is the selection with Julia I mean we spend a lot of resources in trying to bring the best guys mainly the best guys number two is the program I mean our program has been growing I mean we have been learning when you are doing this for a lot of years you understand the things that we have to do and the things that you don't have to right but the main goal for our paren is to really help these startups early stages start after they already have some product or maybe some initial traction this is what we are looking for to really find the product feet on the market feet what we are trying to do most of the starters they fail because they are not able to find the product via the market fit right then they then they have a lot of friction in order to get sales or revenues or users so friction no significant traction so no investor trust you because you don't have significant traction and then good game over okay so our main goal during the program that's why I use a word processor or a structure but also our big network of contacts is to help these guys to move your assumptions to a real product feed market feed company and because at the end of the day you wouldn't start up I mean you have your network you are your co-founders your network of 10 15 people around you and you are trying to base the in basing the assumptions or what you believe what you think and the people around you that unfortunately is not you know right because you're trying to build something that pretend to be disruptive or pretend to captured a big portion of the market well the likelihood that you and your small group is going to be able to do the so is a chance so we we put then in our process we allow them to have contact with a lot of people with paraphilias people in order to validate all these assumptions and do this Lean Startup and test and to iterate and to change a lot of things in order to by the end of the program hopefully having then much more close to the bottom feeder market because you have a much better for the feeder market feed well you might be kind of super great company or not but the chances on the likelihood to be to stay in the market it's gonna be much more high yeah and Barcelona as a city we're all in Barcelona we're all operating from Barcelona a city that's growing very rapidly in terms of startups innovation and also accelerators incubators and venture builders but not what do you think is it a good thing for a city in itself to have a lot of these players active when I talk to people at events and around the city people saying oh I didn't know it was so many accelerators here like this is a very positive thing but for the accelerators itself probably you would want to be the only one that's here right so what what do you think do you think it's it's a good thing or I do think it's a good thing for society in general and for for enterpreneurs of course they have bigger choice so I think it's good that there are 2,000 accelerators and and if there were 20,000 it would be better another thing is that accelerators are sustainable and profitable business models that's another separate issue but I think it's very good that we give resources to people that is thinking on starting an idea and they have no clue whatsoever where to start from and so any kind of help you can give to these people at these stages it it helps a lot yeah you you are moving more out over to the boutique kind of doing an acceleration or as a venture Bueller as you call it and all the accelerators are basically they have different type of programs but they look kind of similar from from the outside do you think more accelerators will you know evolve into this venture a builder thing or how do you see in the next five years well it's funny because you have here two different two different people that started in sort of different ways but I think we are both going to the same model but not on myself on there Hannah hell started up with a different model but with a better branding and better well-known company all over Europe so and and he's very niche oriented very vertically oriented so I think those are the two models are will probably prevail I don't think there is the traditional accelerators that just bring mentors into the companies I don't think that could be sustainable over time unless there are migrating towards helping companies develop their own in in company programs which is for example what what connector is doing I think that would help a lot with sustainability for for them but I think in the end in my perspective is that the best model for some type of people for example in our case or a case of permit is the company wheeler I mean we feel more comfortable with that model we believe that we can create a lot of value with that model and well our progress so far is make me make me think that we are on there on the right track right and there's always a lot of developers and entrepreneurs watching and listening to this podcast and I'm he'll do people that are thinking should I enter an accelerator is this the right choice to me in your opinion what kind of startup what what do you need to have to apply for an accelerator what do you think well as we said before I mean there are different types of a Cerritos I think the first thing I will I will tell the entrepreneurs is to do the homework I mean to understand the stage that they are right now to understand any accelerator what they are looking for their oscillators or incubators that they are targeting pre acceleration companies or pre idea or idea state so there are different states at these early days of the companies they have to understand what they are in because different accelerators are targeting to different kind of teams or the different kind of companies so the first thing is to do your homework try to understand which are the cell raters incubators or venture builders that are really fitting in what you are right now second thing is trying to understand how these guys are going to help me I mean it's to really the same way that the when you are trying to raise money you try to understand more and more the investors do the same thing with the cell rate or try to understand who are the guys behind rado behind incubator behind the venture builder what's your bag down how are you planning to help me be very soft stick with that because it's some kind of Mario's most of these relationship ends with an equity a change so it's going to be your partner it's not going to be for the next three months it's gonna be forever so do your homework and and to be honest I mean the teams are much more successful where the teams are were much more demanding at the beginning right being very why you're gonna help me what are the things that you're gonna me can't you this kind of list of things is something that you believe that we can achieve within the program trying to understand what are the outcomes of the program it's not yes go to website apply online I mean try to have these one on one interviews and in my experience the best things are the ones are much more demanding trying to understand what are gonna be the outcome of the stellarator and is there any like misconceptions of startups applying that they're thinking that you can can give them something that you can't give them there are a lot of misconceptions and I think this is one of the issues of the of the accelerators I mean I agree with Bernard saying that as much as we can it's going to be great it's as far as all of them can deliver enough quality value because this is at the installation that is not a clear definition right Nessa said before I mean most entrepreneurs are confused what doesn't mean I mean it's gonna be a table and one mentor coming two days a week or whatever is gonna be like we do 30 workshops 15 people really helping me every day plus 80 mentor whatever so it's not clear so I mean it's good to have a lot of a straight or Sieben in Barcelona as far as most of think and deliver enough level of quality because if not intrapreneurs are joining this straight to the may be is not delivering enough level of quality and there is a bad feeling right and this is then affecting the others that we are trying to do in a proper way right right we are not talking about model here that is a pre accelerator which is what start narrator is something where entrepreneurs can come and come be there for at least six weeks can have an exposition to Mentors but we are not requiring any equity from them or any kind of payment in any kind of mining right so basically we are just giving to that yeah so that's how good thing for them I mean for entrepreneurs in order to for the less experienced people to take and to have a first feeling of what it is to win in an accelerator so I think this kind of program is also a good thing for people with without experience but if you have some more experience and you've been already into a pre accelerator or some other experience which could help then it's a matter of finding out exactly what is that you are going to be given from that program in particular and see if it really matches what you really need and you have some success stories as well like also like it it Megan and startup bootcamp what are like the factors within these companies that that you call them success stories well it depends also it begins by the entrepreneur by the entrepreneurial team I think it's one of the most important elements the other element is the the sector in which they are in and the time in which they got into that into that sector we have a very good experience in e-commerce there was a company that was astir have five years ago and we have a also very bad story on another ecommerce company that started like two years or three years ago so the thing is three years ago for a fashion equivalence for example was too late and there was a that thing was very rude but the opportunity we probably wasn't there anymore because solando was already there with a huge investment and asus was already the UK so it wasn't anymore an opportunity despite the team was I would team deliver you know what they had to deliver so I guess if you take a look at those two issues you probably have fifty percent of the issues you need to take a look already there then there are other other issues like for example the capability of the team to get investment which is obviously something very very important as well but I would say those three issues are probably the most important ones in my case it is clear everybody is saying in all levels of the chain right intrapreneur is the most important thing right but I think it's much more important in this kind of vehicles we're talking about when you build the roster orators to have someone open-minded I mean flexible and with the ability to listen the ability to because his cell rate or some bunch of business all about that I mean this is that is now initial business plan that is going to be made so the things are gonna change so and things are going to change much better if you are listening and you are learning from what you are getting so you ask him be forming with it what you have to look at the decelerator or a venture builder when you are looking for I also mean they also have to take a look inside and so if they are ready to really go through this kind of process because I mean is there are people I you know listening I mean these people are saying I'm listening you but they are not listening me right and it's not that we have to take your decision but you have to be open-minded open to change flexible those are very important skills that you should have if you want to be part of one of one of these companies of process right and how is it for you to because but not said that we are interested in getting talent like developers marketers the best ones but but you usually start with my idea right you usually start with the entrepreneur when you take people in how do you I make sure that they have the right kind of talent already inside the team all it's a combination of a lot of things and something that you developed from time to time to really understand yes for you to put an example during our selection process I mean as I said before I mean we start with a big thing a big database and we nail down and at the end we finish with inviting 20 teams to parcel enough to stay for the week with us from this year we have 20 teams fronting was 12 different countries Australia Hindi and so on so with these two days we do a lot of things for instance one of the things that we do is to have some psychologist interview in these these people I mean is what something that we learn from this period is trying to understand if because someone could be a good entrepreneur but at the end we need a team is that in gonna be able to work together well it's another layer of information in order to validate this make sense or not right and but not for many when I speak people venture builder is something a bit cryptic it's a bit new and a venture builder it's not given that everybody knows what that is right away but we just started a new company at evening is called factorial can you tell us a bit the process I guess this is a process that you haven't done yet but like how do you plan to help this company within it Nick how do you plan to support a new company because it's a bit special we start something right now so you say Ben to build it is cryptic it's because we give fancy names to things yeah it used to be a group of companies right it's a growth companies and so how do how does it work it doesn't have a fixed way to work and that's why we don't have a program or you know and so we try to look for talent continuously to work in our startups and we do events with the workshops with our kind of stuff like other accelerators would do and but our goal is to find talent to work in our startups and then since we start the relationship with these people a professional relationship in in in all of our startups we start understanding how do they perform and how do they work in marketing in development whatever and then when once we know these people we know how to perform we know how do they work in their teams then we are in a better position and to think of investing on those people so that's your final or final stats through professional relationship we work together and then we consider why don't we start a company together so it's the opposite way right so we try to look for performance people who do worse you know and then we at the same time we analyze markets and we come up with ideas and we have limited resources we cannot be starting everything in the world like maybe drugget internet - no hmm so we try to the boat or small resources to the biggest opportunities we find and that's how it works we also get in contact with our with a network of investors that that are very related to - to what we do and they invested a cleaner companies so we never we never wanted to raise money in it Nick so we would have a problem a conflict of interest because then we would have to accept projects and look for projects and and we would have to enter projects in a certain amount of time so we try our investors - we tell our investors to invest directly in our companies and we are focused solely completely on growing our companies and and growing or companies as a business because that's you talked before about misconceptions I think one of the biggest misconceptions is that getting funded is growing your business and this happens a lot with mental builder and an accelerator so we have a sort of a conflict of interest here because and we think that our business model ultimately is is exiting companies and having two turns and equity so and we push sometimes companies to get funded two three value and to get revalued and raise the value of the company and then or returns an equity are bigger but for business to make sense I the purpose is to grow as a business so to make the business sustainable but also scalable and and that should be the ultimate goal not finding and over funding and over funding which is what is happening and sometimes and it creates sort of small bubbles in different sectors so I think that the purpose of a business is to grow with as little resources as possible and with as little dilution as possible great that was everything we had time for unfortunately forty-five minutes go by fast but let's stay tuned for our next podcast in in December remember that you can catch the highlights from from this podcast in video form on on ethnic blog and or on our Facebook and everywhere we are online thank you again uh elevation but not for coming I really appreciate taking your time you are all very busy so I really appreciate it and my name is Sandra oblong and I remember to follow ethnic for for more quality tech discussions also in the future [Music]